Designing optically tracked instruments for image-guided surgery

Most image-guided surgery (IGS) systems track the positions of surgical instruments in the physical space occupied by the patient. This task is commonly performed using an optical tracking system that determines the positions of fiducial markers such as infrared-emitting diodes or retroreflective spheres that are attached to the instrument. Instrument tracking error is an important component of the overall IGS system error. This paper is concerned with the effect of fiducial marker configuration (number and spatial distribution) on tip position tracking error. Statistically expected tip position tracking error is calculated by applying results from the point-based registration error theory developed by Fitzpatrick et al. Tracking error depends not only on the error in localizing the fiducials, which is the error value generally provided by manufacturers of optical tracking systems, but also on the number and spatial distribution of the tracking fiducials and the position of the instrument tip relative to the fiducials. The theory is extended in two ways. First, a formula is derived for the special case in which the fiducials and the tip are collinear. Second, the theory is extended for the case in which there is a composition of transformations, as is the situation for tracking an instrument relative to a coordinate reference frame (i.e., a set of fiducials attached to the patient). The derivation reveals that the previous theory may be applied independently to the two transformations; the resulting independent components of tracking error add in quadrature to give the overall tracking error. The theoretical results are verified with numerical simulations and experimental measurements. The results in this paper may be useful for the design of optically tracked instruments for image-guided surgery; this is illustrated with several examples.

[1]  E P Wilkinson,et al.  Comparative tracking error analysis of five different optical tracking systems. , 2000, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[2]  Jay B. West,et al.  Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  M. Staal.  Textbook of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery , 1999, Spinal Cord.

[4]  D. Hill,et al.  Accurate frameless registration of MR and CT images of the head: applications in planning surgery and radiation therapy. , 1994, Radiology.

[5]  Robert B. Fisher,et al.  Estimating 3-D rigid body transformations: a comparison of four major algorithms , 1997, Machine Vision and Applications.

[6]  Jay B. West,et al.  The distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  B. Green.  THE ORTHOGONAL APPROXIMATION OF AN OBLIQUE STRUCTURE IN FACTOR ANALYSIS , 1952 .

[8]  Richard A. Volz,et al.  Estimating 3-D location parameters using dual number quaternions , 1991, CVGIP Image Underst..

[9]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using orthonormal matrices , 1988 .

[10]  P. Schönemann,et al.  A generalized solution of the orthogonal procrustes problem , 1966 .

[11]  R. Sibson.  Studies in the Robustness of Multidimensional Scaling: Perturbational Analysis of Classical Scaling , 1979 .

[12]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Computer-Integrated Surgery: Technology and Clinical Applications , 1995 .

[13]  M. Hebert,et al.  The Representation, Recognition, and Locating of 3-D Objects , 1986 .

[14]  Jay B. West,et al.  Nonlinear averaging method to optimize the accuracy of optical tracking , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[15]  S. Umeyama,et al.  Least-Squares Estimation of Transformation Parameters Between Two Point Patterns , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[16]  K. S. Arun,et al.  Least-Squares Fitting of Two 3-D Point Sets , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[17]  Jay B. West,et al.  Implementation, calibration and accuracy testing of an image-enhanced endoscopy system , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Jay B. West,et al.  Fiducial Point Placement and the Accuracy of Point-based, Rigid Body Registration , 2001, Neurosurgery.

[19]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Registration of 3-D images using weighted geometrical features , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[20]  R. Macfarlane.  Advanced Neurosurgical Navigation. , 1999, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[21]  Jay B. West,et al.  Extension of target registration error theory to the composition of transforms , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[22]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions , 1987 .

[23]  Venkateswara R. Mandava.  Three dimensional multimodal image registration using implanted markers , 1992 .

[24]  Fabrice Chassat,et al.  Experimental Protocol for Accuracy Evaluation of 6-d Localizers for Computer-Integrated Surgery: Application to Four Optical Localizers , 1998, MICCAI.

[25]  Robert J. Maciunas,et al.  Registration of head volume images using implantable fiducial markers , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  M. Froimowitz,et al.  Geometrical correspondence between phenazocine and the enkephalins. , 1986, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[27]  S. Schmerber,et al.  Accuracy evaluation of a CAS system: laboratory protocol and results with 6D localizers, and clinical experiences in otorhinolaryngology. , 2001, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[28]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Anatomical-Functional Correlative Analysis Of The Human Brain Using Three Dimensional Imaging Systems , 1989, Medical Imaging.

[29]  Allan H. Friedman.  Advanced Techniques in Image-Guided Brain and Spine Surgery. , 2004 .