Needs assessment: from theory to practice

This is the third in a series of six articles describing approaches to and topics for health needs assessment, and how the results can be used effectively The purpose of needs assessment in health care is to gather the information required to bring about change beneficial to the health of the population. It is generally, but not universally, accepted that this takes place within the context of finite resources.1 “Health gain” can therefore be achieved by reallocating resources as a result of identifying four factors: The subjects of healthcare needs assessment are the populations and patients who are recipients or potential beneficiaries of health care. Populations, of course, include individual patients. The assessment of individuals' needs may form part of the assessment of a population's needs, but it may be costly and it risks ignoring individuals with needs who do not present themselves for health care. Table 1 shows the circumstances favouring individual needs assessment for planning purposes. View this table: Table 1 Factors determining basis for assessing healthcare needs The priority attached to different needs, whether of populations or of individuals, raises philosophical problems. For example, should the principal criterion be the benefit that could potentially be obtained for each individual, or the severity of their presenting condition?2 In other words, should greater priority (a greater assessed need) be attributed to the need for surgery of a patient with early stage colorectal cancer or to the need for hospice care of a terminally ill lung cancer patient? In practice the former, the approach that favours the greater …

[1]  C. Brewin,et al.  Measuring mental health needs , 1992 .

[2]  C. Warwick The new NHS: modern dependable , 1998 .

[3]  A. Stevens,et al.  Health Care Needs Assessment: The Epidemiologically Based Needs Assessment Reviews , 1996 .

[4]  A. Mahon,et al.  Total Purchasing: A Profile of National Pilot Projects , 1997 .

[5]  A. Culyer Need: the idea won't do--but we still need it. , 1995, Social science & medicine.

[6]  A. Kinmonth,et al.  Managing change in general practice: a step by step guide. , 1992, BMJ.

[7]  K McPherson,et al.  An assessment of prostatectomy for benign urinary tract obstruction. Geographic variations and the evaluation of medical care outcomes. , 1988, JAMA.

[8]  C A Osborne,et al.  Renal disease. , 1971, The Veterinary clinics of North America.

[9]  A Harrison,et al.  Series: Funding the NHS. Is the NHS underfunded? , 1997, BMJ.

[10]  F. Mosteller,et al.  A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. , 1992, JAMA.

[11]  S. Murray,et al.  Needs assessment in general practice. , 1996, Occasional paper.

[12]  S. Gillam Assessing the health care needs of populations--the general practitioner's contribution. , 1992, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[13]  M Pringle,et al.  Large computer databases in general practice. , 1991, BMJ.

[14]  J. Gabbay,et al.  Needs assessment needs assessment.... , 1991, Health trends.

[15]  Anthony J. Culyer,et al.  Need and the National Health Service: Economics and social choice , 1976 .

[16]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Transferring evidence from research into practice: 2. Getting the evidence straight , 1997, Evidence-Based Medicine.