Correlation between sound insulation and occupants’ perception – Proposal of alternative single number rating of impact sound

Traditionally, multi-family houses have been constructed using heavy, homogenous materials like concrete and masonry. But as a consequence of the progress of lightweight building systems during the last decades, it has been questioned whether standardized sound insulation evaluation methods still are appropriate. An extensive measurement template has been applied in a field survey where several vibrational and acoustical parameters were determined in ten Swedish buildings of various constructions. In the same buildings, the occupants were asked to rate the perceived annoyance from a variety of natural sound sources. The highest annoyance score concerned impact sounds, mainly in the buildings with lightweight floors. Statistical analyses between the measured parameters and the subjective ratings revealed a useful correlation between the rated airborne sound insulation and R'(w) + C50-3150 while the correlation between the rated impact sound insulation and L'(n,w) + C-1,C-50-2500 was weak. The latter correlation was considerably improved when the spectrum adaptation term with an extended frequency range starting from 20 Hz was applied. This suggests that frequencies below 50 Hz should be considered when evaluating impact sound in lightweight buildings. (c) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. (Less)

[1]  Nata Amiryarahmadi,et al.  Time-domain model of a tapping machine , 2011 .

[2]  E Eddy Gerretsen A new system for rating impact sound insulation , 1976 .

[3]  Birgit Rasmussen,et al.  Assessment of airborne and impact noise from neighbours , 1997 .

[4]  Robert W. Krug Sound Level Meters , 2007 .

[5]  Klas Hagberg Evaluating Field Measurements of Impact Sound , 2010 .

[6]  Birgit Rasmussen,et al.  Sound insulation between dwellings – Requirements in building regulations in Europe , 2010 .

[7]  Klas Hagberg,et al.  Acoustical Performance of Apartment Buildings – Resident's Survey and Field Measurements. AkuLite Report 2 , 2011 .

[8]  Carl Hopkins,et al.  ISO 16283-1 Acoustics - Field measurement of sound insulation in buildings and of building elements - Airborne sound insulation , 2014 .

[9]  David Quirt,et al.  CEN/TC 126 Acoustic properties of building elements and of buildings & COST Action TU0901 Integrating and Harmonizing Sound Insulation Aspects in Sustainable Urban Housing Constructions , 2013 .

[10]  Pontus Thorsson Laboratory listening tests on footfall sounds , 2013 .

[11]  K. Bodlund,et al.  Alternative reference curves for evaluation of the impact sound insulation between dwellings , 1985 .

[12]  Volker Wittstock,et al.  Revision of ISO 717: Why Not Use Impact Sound Reduction Indices Instead of Impact sound Pressure Levels? Part 2: Application to Different Impact Sources , 2013 .

[13]  Anders Ågren,et al.  How to match building acoustic measurements with subjective judgments , 2012 .