Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Precessing Helical Vortex in a Conical Diffuser, With Rotor–Stator Interaction

The flow unsteadiness generated in a swirling apparatus is investigated experimentally and numerically. The swirl apparatus has two parts: a swirl generator and a test section. The swirl generator includes two blade rows, one stationary and one rotating, is designed such that the emanating flow resembles that of a Francis hydro turbine operated at partial discharge. The test section consists of a conical diffuser similar to the draft tube cone of a Francis turbine. A new control method based on a magneto rheological brake is employed in the rotating section, runner, in order to produce several swirling flow regimes. The LDV measurements are performed along three survey axes in the test section. The measured mean velocity components and its fluctuating parts are used to validate the results of unsteady numerical simulations, conducted using the FOAM-extend-3.0 CFD code. A dynamic mesh is used together with the sliding General Grid Interfaces (GGI) to mimic the effect of the rotating runner. The delayed detached eddy simulation method, conjugated with the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model (DDES-SA), is applied to achieve a deep insight about the ability of this advanced modeling technique and the physics of the flow. The RNG k-epsilon model is also used to represent state-of-the art of industrial turbulence modeling. Both models predict the mean velocity reasonably well while DDES-SA presents more realistic flow features at the highest and lowest rotational speeds. The highest level of turbulence occurs at the highest and lowest rotational speeds which DDES-SA is able to predict well in the conical diffuser. The special shape of the blade plays more prominent role at lower rotational speeds and creates coherent structures with opposite sign of vorticity. The vortex rope is captured by both turbulence models while DDES-SA presents more realistic one at higher rotational speeds.

[1]  Peter Dörfler,et al.  Flow-Induced Pulsation and Vibration in Hydroelectric Machinery: Engineer’s Guidebook for Planning, Design and Troubleshooting , 2012 .

[2]  Håkan Nilsson,et al.  A comparative study of scale-adaptive and large-eddy simulations of highly swirling turbulent flow through an abrupt expansion , 2014 .

[4]  Sebastian Muntean,et al.  Mathematical modelling of swirling flow in hydraulic turbines for the full operating range , 2011 .

[5]  A sensitivity study of vortex breakdown onset to upstream boundary conditions , 2010, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  Alin Bosioc,et al.  Unsteady Pressure Analysis of a Swirling Flow With Vortex Rope and Axial Water Injection in a Discharge Cone , 2012 .

[7]  John Kim,et al.  The structure of pressure fluctuations in turbulent shear flows , 1991 .

[8]  P. Spalart,et al.  A New Version of Detached-eddy Simulation, Resistant to Ambiguous Grid Densities , 2006 .

[9]  M. P. Escudier,et al.  Recirculation in swirling flow - A manifestation of vortex breakdown , 1985 .

[10]  I. V. Litvinov,et al.  Computer simulation of flow at part load in a laboratory model of Kaplan hydroturbine by RANS, DES and LES , 2015 .

[11]  Alin Bosioc,et al.  Flow-Feedback Method for Mitigating the Vortex Rope in Decelerated Swirling Flows , 2013 .

[12]  David F. Fletcher,et al.  CFD simulation of precession in sudden pipe expansion flows with low inlet swirl , 2002 .

[13]  F. Avellan,et al.  Analysis of the Cavitating Draft Tube Vortex in a Francis Turbine Using Particle Image Velocimetry Measurements in Two-Phase Flow , 2008 .

[14]  Mohamed A. Habib,et al.  Heat transfer characteristics in a sudden expansion pipe equipped with swirl generators , 2011 .

[15]  Philip Clausen,et al.  Measurements of a swirling turbulent boundary layer developing in a conical diffuser , 1993 .

[16]  Håkan Nilsson,et al.  LES and DES of Strongly Swirling Turbulent Flow through a Suddenly Expanding Circular Pipe , 2015 .

[17]  P. Spalart Detached-Eddy Simulation , 2009 .

[18]  Håkan Nilsson,et al.  Velocity and pressure fluctuations induced by the precessing helical vortex in a conical diffuser , 2014 .

[19]  Håkan Nilsson,et al.  Exploration of rotation/curvature correction method in hydropower application , 2015 .

[20]  Fazle Hussain,et al.  COLLAPSE, SYMMETRY BREAKING, AND HYSTERESIS IN SWIRLING FLOWS , 1999 .

[21]  Hrvoje Jasak,et al.  Development of a Generalized Grid Mesh Interface for Turbomachinery simulations with OpenFOAM , 2008 .

[22]  Håkan Nilsson,et al.  Design and Validation of a Scale-Adaptive Filtering Technique for LRN Turbulence Modeling of Unsteady Flow , 2008 .

[23]  Alin Bosioc,et al.  Unsteady pressure measurements of decelerated swirling flow in a discharge cone at lower runner speeds , 2014 .

[24]  S. J. Kline,et al.  Quasi-coherent structures in the turbulent boundary layer. II - Verification and new information from a numerically simulated flat-plate layer , 1990 .

[25]  Narayanan Komerath,et al.  Turbulent static pressure fluctuations away from flow boundaries , 1985 .

[26]  Sebastian Muntean,et al.  Decelerated Swirling Flow Control in the Discharge Cone of Francis Turbines , 2009 .

[27]  Hrvoje Jasak,et al.  The OpenFOAM turbomachinery working group, and conclusions from the turbomachinery session of the third OpenFOAM Workshop , 2008 .

[28]  A. Javadi,et al.  Time-accurate Numerical Simulations of Swirling Flow with Rotor-stator Interaction , 2015 .

[29]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method , 1979 .