Effects of self‐monitoring and familiarity on deception detection 1

This study investigated the effects of familiarity and self‐monitoring on observer accuracy in deception detection. Observers varying in self‐reported self‐monitoring made judgments of truthfulness or lying after either exposure or no exposure to segments of a communicator's truthful behavior. Results indicated that observers familiar with a communicator's truthful behavior were significantly more accurate than those who were not; that accuracy increased significantly as self‐reported self‐monitoring increased; and that there was no significant interaction between self‐monitoring and familiarity.

[1]  Gerald R. Miller,et al.  The Truth-Deception Attribution: Effects of Familiarity on the Ability of Observers to Detect Deception. , 1980 .

[2]  James A. Thurber,et al.  ACCURACY OF JUDGMENTS OF DECEPTION WHEN AN INTERVIEW IS WATCHED, HEARD, AND READ , 1968 .

[3]  G. Littlepage,et al.  Verbal, Facial, and Paralinguistic Cues to the Detection of Truth and Lying , 1978 .

[4]  M. Orne,et al.  Effects of heightened motivation on the detection of deception. , 1963 .

[5]  P. Ekman,et al.  Nonverbal Leakage and Clues to Deception †. , 1969, Psychiatry.

[6]  A. Lubin The Interpretation of Significant Interaction , 1961 .

[7]  P. Ekman,et al.  Detecting deception from the body or face. , 1974 .

[8]  G. Miller,et al.  Detecting Deception: The Relationship of Available Information to Judgmental Accuracy in Initial Encounters. , 1980 .

[9]  M. Snyder Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. , 1974 .

[10]  M. Knapp,et al.  Telling It Like It Isn't: A Review of Theory and Research on Deceptive Communications. , 1979 .

[11]  M. Knapp,et al.  An Exploration of Deception as a Communication Construct , 1974 .

[12]  M. Orne,et al.  The effects of task and method of stimulus presentation on the detection of deception. , 1964 .

[13]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Humans as lie detectors. , 1980, The Journal of communication.

[14]  Reliability of Reasons Used in Making Judgments of Honesty and Dishonesty , 1967, Perceptual and motor skills.

[15]  Gerald R. Miller,et al.  DETECTING DECEPTIVE COMMUNICATION FROM VERBAL, VISUAL, AND PARALINGUISTIC CUES1 , 1979 .

[16]  Glenn E. Littlepagel,et al.  Detection of Deceptive Factual Statements from the Body and the Face , 1979 .

[17]  M. Orne,et al.  Effects of perceived role and role success on the detection of deception. , 1965, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  Effects of the type of stimulus employed and the level of subject awareness on the detection of deception. , 1968, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  G. Elliott Some Effects of Deception and Level of Self-Monitoring on Planning and Reacting to a Self-Presentation , 1979 .

[20]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Verbal and nonverbal cues in the perception of lying. , 1978 .

[21]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  Facial and vocal cues of deception and honesty , 1979 .

[22]  SENSITIVITY TO ATTEMPTS AT DECEPTION IN AN INTERVIEW SITUATION1, 2 , 1966 .