Systematic mechanism for identifying the relative impact of supply chain performance areas on the overall supply chain performance using SCOR model and SEM

Abstract This research aims to introduce a systematic mechanism for developing an organization specific supply chain performance measurement (SCPM) model and for generating a single regression relationship between the overall supply chain performance (SCP) and each of the SCPM areas using an organization's numerical data. The research uses a case study conducted in a small-scale asphalt manufacturing plant located in West Texas, USA with a sample of 218 data records collected over a period of one year. In this article, the systematic mechanism is demonstrated using the data from the case study organization. It provides guidance for developing a hierarchical SCPM model for the organization using the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) model, and then to obtain the final regression equation for the overall SCP using the Structural Equations Modeling (SEM) technique. The results obtained from the SCPM mechanism are then compared with the managerial input on the SCP that was analyzed using the Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP). The results of the comparison are used to validate the SCPM results. A major finding of this research is that the regression coefficients provide a clue for the level of sensitivity those measures have on the overall SCP under given organizational SC capacity and operating levels. The SCPM areas with higher regression coefficients reflect higher sensitivity, thus even a slight variation in the measures contributing to those areas will be contributing to a considerable impact on the overall SCP measures. The findings lead to the implication that managers should pay close attention to controlling the stability of the SC operational processes which are responsible for generating those SCP measures. The goal should be to maintain the desired output levels with the least amount of fluctuations. The regression results therefore provide insight to the managers for identifying the individual SCP measures to be managed more intensely than others based on their relative impacts on the overall SCP. The results are applicable as long as the organization does not change its organizational SC capacity and operating levels, thus can be used for better managing the SC in future. This research fulfills multiple research gaps highlighted in literature, mainly: the absence of a systematic approach to generate an organization specific SCPM model; and the absence of a SCPM system capable of generating a single cause–and-effect relationship between the overall SCP and the numerous hierarchical performance measures reflecting their relative impact. Therefore, this study can be viewed as an attempt to increase the level of awareness in the SC field. The article also proposes several future research directions to test the repeatability and validity of the proposed SCPM mechanism.

[1]  Gordon Stewart,et al.  Supply‐chain operations reference model (SCOR): the first cross‐industry framework for integrated supply‐chain management , 1997 .

[2]  Douglas M. Lambert,et al.  Supply Chain Management: Processes, Partnerships, Performance , 2004 .

[3]  Kuan Yew Wong,et al.  Supply chain performance measurement system using DEA modeling , 2007, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[4]  Kenneth J. White,et al.  THE DURBIN-WATSON TEST FOR SERIAL CORRELATION WITH EXTREME SAMPLE SIZES OR MANY REGRESSORS' , 1977 .

[5]  Jian Cai,et al.  Improving supply chain performance management: A systematic approach to analyzing iterative KPI accomplishment , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[6]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self‐esteem , 1994 .

[7]  B. Beamon Supply chain design and analysis:: Models and methods , 1998 .

[8]  W. G. Sullivan,et al.  Capital Investment Analysis For Engineering And Management , 1995 .

[9]  D. Hoaglin,et al.  Fine-Tuning Some Resistant Rules for Outlier Labeling , 1987 .

[10]  Adisak Theeranuphattana,et al.  A conceptual model of performance measurement for supply chains: Alternative considerations , 2007 .

[11]  Jodie B. Ullman,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling: Reviewing the Basics and Moving Forward , 2006, Journal of personality assessment.

[12]  Ling Li,et al.  Ensuring supply chain quality performance through applying the SCOR model , 2011 .

[13]  Bülent Sezen,et al.  Relative effects of design, integration and information sharing on supply chain performance , 2008 .

[14]  Hing Kai Chan,et al.  A CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT FOR SUPPLY CHAINS , 2003 .

[15]  Ajith Sundaram A Painstaking Exploration on the Influence of Perceived Benefits towards Training on Training and Development in Indian IT/ITES Industry , 2016 .

[16]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  Performance measures and metrics in logistics and supply chain management: a review of recent literature (1995–2004) for research and applications , 2007 .

[17]  Mohamed Rasmy,et al.  Supply Chain Performance Measurement Approaches: Review and Classification , 2012 .

[18]  V. A. Sposito,et al.  On the efficiency of using the sample kurtosis in selecting optimal lpestimators , 1983 .

[19]  Jennifer Blackhurst,et al.  Supplier evaluation and selection: an augmented DEA approach , 2009 .

[20]  M. Miller,et al.  Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models , 2013, Educational and psychological measurement.

[21]  F. Chan,et al.  An innovative performance measurement method for supply chain management , 2003 .

[22]  Richard G. Lomax,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling , 2022 .

[23]  Batuhan Kocaoglu,et al.  A SCOR based approach for measuring a benchmarkable supply chain performance , 2011, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

[24]  Andy Neely,et al.  Implementing performance measurement systems: a literature review , 2003 .

[25]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[26]  J. Edwards,et al.  Partial least squares path modeling: Time for some serious second thoughts , 2016 .

[27]  G. P. Kurien,et al.  Study of performance measurement practices in supply chain management , 2011 .

[28]  John R. Current,et al.  Non-cooperative negotiation strategies for vendor selection , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  S. Lamouri,et al.  A framework for analysing supply chain performance evaluation models , 2013 .

[30]  Michael R. Mullen,et al.  Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit , 2008 .