Dynamics of Agent Organizations: Application to Modeling Irregular Warfare

In this paper, we focus on computational modeling of adversarial activities and asymmetric warfare in a tactical setting. As a topic for simulation study, asymmetric warfare is an odd and ill-conditioned problem. Empirical data is scarce or one-sided, while the subject itself presents a constantly adapting and moving target that makes it a strategic priority to conceal its inner workings from the observers. To provide an insight into the dynamics of the asymmetric conflicts, one needs to constrain the model in rigorous social-scientific concepts, including those of organization theory, theory of collective action, and social network analysis. Our model, called NetMason, enables controlled experiments to replicate and analyze alternative policies of disruption of activities of terrorist organizations. In addition, sensitivity analysis with respect to behavioral assumptions can be easily performed.

[1]  Richard A. Falkenrath,et al.  Analytic Models and Policy Prescription: Understanding Recent Innovation in U.S. Counterterrorism , 2001 .

[2]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  ORA: Organization Risk Analyzer , 2004 .

[3]  D. Wegner Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[4]  Kathleen M. Carley Dynamic Network Analysis , 2003 .

[5]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers , 2004 .

[6]  Anand S. Rao,et al.  Modeling Rational Agents within a BDI-Architecture , 1997, KR.

[7]  Andrew Ilachinski,et al.  Artificial War: Multiagent-Based Simulation of Combat , 2004 .

[8]  Sean Luke,et al.  MASON: A Multiagent Simulation Environment , 2005, Simul..

[9]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations , 1967 .

[10]  Austin Tate,et al.  Generating Project Networks , 1977, IJCAI.

[11]  Jaime Simão Sichman,et al.  Advances in Artificial Intelligence - IBERAMIA-SBIA 2006, 2nd International Joint Conference, 10th Ibero-American Conference on AI, 18th Brazilian AI Symposium, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil, October 23-27, 2006, Proceedings , 2006, IBERAMIA-SBIA.

[12]  Kathleen M. Carley Smart Agents and Organizations of the Future , 2001 .

[13]  Marc Sageman,et al.  Understanding terror networks. , 2004, International journal of emergency mental health.

[14]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Radar‐soar: Towards an artificial organization composed of intelligent agents* , 1995 .

[15]  Mario Gómez,et al.  Honesty and trust revisited: the advantages of being neutral about other’s cognitive models , 2007, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[16]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  DyNetML: Interchange Format for Rich Social Network Data , 2004 .

[17]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[18]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Destabilizing dynamic networks under conditions of uncertainty , 2003, IEMC '03 Proceedings. Managing Technologically Driven Organizations: The Human Side of Innovation and Change (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37502).

[19]  André M. C. Campos,et al.  Simulating Working Environments Through the Use of Personality-Based Agents , 2006, IBERAMIA-SBIA.