An investigation of the ability of the human visual system to encode spatial phase relationships

Evidence is presented that the human visual system contains broad-band mechanisms capable of encoding the spatial phase relationship between a fundamental spatial frequency and higher frequencies up to its third harmonic. Compounds of a fundamental and its harmonics above the third become progressively more difficult to discriminate by means of phase information alone. Measurements were also made of the amount of spatial summation found in various detection and phase discrimination tasks using simple or compound gratings composed of a fundamental frequency (F) and its third harmonic (3F). A task requiring the discrimination of the phase relationship between a low contrast (F) and a high contrast (3F) shows less spatial summation than does a task requiring the detection of the (F) component by itself. A simple model is advanced to account for these results qualitatively. The model is based upon the hypothesis that the human visual system analyses the retinal image in patches of a range of sizes and that phase relationships may be discerned only between components that are detected by different elements of the same patch mechanism.

[1]  M. P. Friedman,et al.  HANDBOOK OF PERCEPTION , 1977 .

[2]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Cortical cells ; Bar and edge detectors, or spatial frequency filters , 1978 .

[3]  J. Movshon,et al.  Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity of neurones in areas 17 and 18 of the cat's visual cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  V. Glezer,et al.  Investigation of complex and hypercomplex receptive fields of visual cortex of the cat as spatial frequency filters. , 1973, Vision research.

[5]  B. Julesz,et al.  Spatial-frequency masking in vision: critical bands and spread of masking. , 1972, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[6]  S. Klein,et al.  Spatial frequency channels in human vision as asymmetric (edge) mechanisms. , 1974, Vision research.

[7]  A. Ginsburg.  Psychological Correlates of a Model of the Human Visual System , 1971 .

[8]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  On the variety of spatial frequency selectivities shown by neurons in area 17 of the cat , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[9]  A. Fiorentini,et al.  Learning in grating waveform discrimination: Specificity for orientation and spatial frequency , 1981, Vision Research.

[10]  Robert F. Hess,et al.  The discriminability of spatial phase relationships in amblyopia , 1982, Vision Research.

[11]  D. Pollen,et al.  Responses of complex cells in the visual cortex of the cat as a function of the length of moving slits , 1976, Brain Research.

[12]  Janette Atkinson,et al.  Channels in Vision: Basic Aspects , 1978 .

[13]  Arthur P Ginsburg,et al.  Visual Information Processing Based on Spatial Filters Constrained by Biological Data. , 1978 .

[14]  R. Hess,et al.  The functional area for summation to threshold for sinusoidal gratings , 1978, Vision Research.

[15]  N. S. Sutherland.  Tutorial Essays in Psychology : Volume 1 , 1978 .

[16]  B Julesz,et al.  Masking in Visual Recognition: Effects of Two-Dimensional Filtered Noise , 1973, Science.

[17]  C. Gilbert.  Laminar differences in receptive field properties of cells in cat primary visual cortex , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  J. Nachmias,et al.  Discrimination of simple and complex gratings , 1975, Vision Research.

[19]  A. Watson.  Summation of grating patches indicates many types of detector at one retinal location , 1982, Vision Research.

[20]  D. Burr.  Sensitivity to spatial phase , 1980, Vision Research.

[21]  B. Julesz,et al.  Early visual perception. , 1981, Annual review of psychology.

[22]  M. J. Wright,et al.  Contrast sensitivity and adaptation as a function of grating length , 1982, Vision Research.

[23]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Interactions between spatial frequency channels , 1978, Vision Research.