Acceptability and usability of a paediatric HIV screening tool in high-volume outpatient settings in Malawi, perspectives from caregivers and healthcare workers

Background Using an HIV pretest screening tool to identify children most at risk for HIV infection may be a more efficient and cost-effective approach to identify children living with HIV in resource-limited settings. These tools seek to reduce overtesting of children by increasing the positive predictive value while ensuring a high negative predictive value for those screened for HIV. Methods This qualitative study in Malawi evaluated acceptability and usability of a modified version of the Zimbabwe HIV screening tool to identify children aged 2–14 years most-at-risk. The tool included additional questions about previous hospitalisations due to malaria and prior documented diagnoses. Sixteen interviews were conducted with expert clients (ECs), trained peer-supporters, which administered the screening tool and 12 interviews with biological and non-biological caregivers of screened children. All interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed and translated. Transcripts were analysed manually using a short-answer analysis, compiling responses for each question by study participant group. Summary documents were generated, identifying common and outlier perspectives. Results The HIV paediatric screening tool was generally accepted by caregivers and ECs, with both groups seeing the benefit of the tool and promoting its use. The ECs who were primarily responsible for implementing the tool initially struggled with acceptance of the tool but started to accept it after additional training and mentorship was provided. Overall, caregivers accepted having their children tested for HIV, although non-biological caregivers expressed hesitancy in giving consent for HIV testing. ECs reported challenges with the ability for non-biological caregivers to answer some questions. Conclusion This study found general acceptance of paediatric screening tools in children in Malawi and identified some minor challenges that raise important considerations for tool implementation. These include the need for a thorough orientation of the tools for the healthcare workers and caregivers, appropriate space at the facility, and adequate staffing and commodities.

[1]  S. Madiba,et al.  Perceived Stigma as a Contextual Barrier to Early Uptake of HIV Testing, Treatment Initiation, and Disclosure; the Case of Patients Admitted with AIDS-Related Illness in a Rural Hospital in South Africa , 2021, Healthcare.

[2]  G. Antelman,et al.  HIV risk screening and HIV testing among orphans and vulnerable children in community settings in Tanzania: Acceptability and fidelity to lay-cadre administration of the screening tool , 2021, PloS one.

[3]  A. Chadambuka,et al.  "We Need it the Same Day": A Qualitative Study of Caregivers and Community Members' Perspectives Toward the Use of Point-of-Care Early Infant Diagnosis. , 2020, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[4]  Riddhi A Modi,et al.  Complexities of HIV Disclosure in Patients Newly Entering HIV Care: A Qualitative Analysis. , 2019, The Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care : JANAC.

[5]  R. Hoffman,et al.  Simple Screening Tool to Help Identify High-Risk Children for Targeted HIV Testing in Malawian Inpatient Wards , 2018, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[6]  H. Weiss,et al.  Screening tool to identify adolescents living with HIV in a community setting in Zimbabwe: A validation study , 2018, PloS one.

[7]  K. Moland,et al.  Boundaries of confidentiality in nursing care for mother and child in HIV programmes , 2016, Nursing ethics.

[8]  J. Dapaah,et al.  HIV/AIDS clients, privacy and confidentiality; the case of two health centres in the Ashanti Region of Ghana , 2016, BMC medical ethics.

[9]  H. Weiss,et al.  Validation of a screening tool to identify older children living with HIV in primary care facilities in high HIV prevalence settings , 2016, AIDS.

[10]  H. Mujuru,et al.  Barriers to Provider-Initiated Testing and Counselling for Children in a High HIV Prevalence Setting: A Mixed Methods Study , 2014, PLoS medicine.

[11]  R. Sauerborn,et al.  Motivation and incentives of rural maternal and neonatal health care providers: a comparison of qualitative findings from Burkina Faso, Ghana and Tanzania , 2013, BMC Health Services Research.

[12]  A. Copas,et al.  Positive Attitudes to Pediatric HIV Testing: Findings from a Nationally Representative Survey from Zimbabwe , 2012, PloS one.

[13]  B. Chi,et al.  Coverage of nevirapine-based services to prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission in 4 African countries. , 2010, JAMA.

[14]  Nigel Rollins,et al.  Routine checks for HIV in children attending primary health care facilities in South Africa: attitudes of nurses and child caregivers. , 2010, Social science & medicine.

[15]  J. Hargrove,et al.  AIDS among older children and adolescents in Southern Africa: projecting the time course and magnitude of the epidemic , 2009, AIDS.

[16]  G. Guest,et al.  How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability , 2005 .