DISCUSSION, COLLABORATIVE KNOWLEDGE WORK AND EPISTEMIC FLUENCY

ABSTRACT:  This paper argues for an action-oriented conception of learning in higher education: one which marries higher order learning (coming to understand) with apprenticeship in knowledge work. It introduces epistemic tasks, forms and fluency as constructs that are useful in giving a more precise meaning to ideas about collaboration in knowledge construction. Discussion is seen as central to collaborative knowledge work and we examine the role of discussion in supporting weaker and stronger interpretations of collaborative knowledge construction.

[1]  R. Barnett,et al.  Towards a Higher Education for a New Century , 1997 .

[2]  F. Marton,et al.  Conceptions of learning , 1993 .

[3]  Alfred North Whitehead.  The Aims of Education and Other Essays , 1967 .

[4]  A. Elzinga.  The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1997 .

[5]  S. Schrire.  Interaction and cognition in asynchronous computer conferencing , 2004 .

[6]  J. Barr,et al.  For a radical higher education after postmodernism , 2002 .

[7]  A. Collins,et al.  Epistemic forms and Epistemic Games: Structures and Strategies to Guide Inquiry , 1993 .

[8]  M. Lawson,et al.  Students’ knowledge about the value of discussions for teaching and learning , 2005 .

[9]  F. Fischer,et al.  Epistemic and social scripts in computer–supported collaborative learning , 2005 .

[10]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[11]  P. Goodyear,et al.  Networked Learning in Higher Education: Students’ Expectations and Experiences , 2005 .

[12]  Ronald Barnett,et al.  Realizing the University in an Age of Supercomplexity , 1999 .

[13]  S. Mann.  Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations , 1999 .

[14]  Lorraine Sherry,et al.  Epistemic Forms and Epistemic Games. , 1996 .

[15]  John B. Biggs,et al.  Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does , 1999 .

[16]  Stellan Ohlsson,et al.  Learning to do and learning to understand : a lesson and a challenge for cognitive modeling , 1996 .

[17]  J. Gosby,et al.  Research and Teaching: Beyond the Divide , 2007 .

[18]  R. Calvo,et al.  Learning through discussions , 2004 .

[19]  Peter Goodyear,et al.  The university student experience of face-to-face and online discussions: coherence, reflection and meaning , 2007 .

[20]  Peter Goodyear.  Technology and the articulation of vocational and academic interests: reflections on time, space and e-learning , 2006 .

[21]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3. , 1994 .

[22]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[23]  Carl Bereiter,et al.  Education and Mind in the Knowledge Age , 2002 .

[24]  Rafael A. Calvo,et al.  Discontinuities in university student experiences of learning through discussions , 2006, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[25]  Bob Moon,et al.  Stimulating professional development through CMC : a case study of networked learning and initial teacher education. , 2004 .

[26]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[27]  R. Swinburne.  OBJECTIVE KNOWLEDGE: AN EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH , 1973 .

[28]  Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer,et al.  Training Complex Cognitive Skills: A Four-Component Instructional Design Model for Technical Training , 1997 .

[29]  Anthonius J.M. de Jong,et al.  Types and qualities of knowledge , 1993 .

[30]  Vivienne Light,et al.  'Let's You and Me Have a Little Discussion': Computer mediated communication in support of campus-based university courses , 2000 .

[31]  Peter Goodyear,et al.  Creating shareable representations of practice , 1998 .

[32]  T. Goh.  Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organisation , 2000 .

[33]  A. Collins,et al.  Epistemic Fluency and Constructivist Learning Environments. , 1995 .

[34]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[35]  Peter Goodyear,et al.  How and what university students learn through online and face-to-face discussion: conceptions, intentions and approaches , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[36]  J. Urry,et al.  Economies of signs and space , 1994 .

[37]  Peter Knight,et al.  A systemic approach to professional development: learning as practice , 2002 .

[38]  Peter Goodyear,et al.  Situated Action and Distributed Knowledge: A JITOL Perspective on EPSS. , 1995 .

[39]  S. Barrie.  Understanding What We Mean by the Generic Attributes of Graduates , 2006 .

[40]  Effie Maclellan,et al.  Conceptual Learning: The Priority for Higher Education , 2005 .

[41]  H. Mandl,et al.  Inert knowledge: Analyses and remedies , 1996 .

[42]  K. Popper.  Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach , 1972 .

[43]  T. Davenport.  Thinking for a living : how to get better performance and results from knowledge workers , 2005 .

[44]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The Transfer of Cognitive Skill , 1989 .