Error-corrected gates on an encoded qubit

To solve classically hard problems, quantum computers need to be resilient to the influence of noise and decoherence. In such a fault-tolerant quantum computer, noise-induced errors must be detected and corrected in real-time to prevent them from propagating between components. This requirement is especially pertinent while applying quantum gates, when the interaction between components can cause errors to quickly spread throughout the system. However, the large overhead involved in most fault-tolerant architectures makes implementing these systems a daunting task, which motivates the search for hardware-efficient alternatives. Here, we present a gate enacted by a multilevel ancilla transmon on a cavity-encoded logical qubit that is fault-tolerant with respect to decoherence in both the ancilla and the encoded qubit. We maintain the purity of the encoded qubit in the presence of ancilla errors by detecting those errors in real-time, and applying the appropriate corrections. We show a reduction of the logical gate error by a factor of two in the presence of naturally occurring decoherence, and demonstrate resilience against ancilla bit-flips and phase-flips by observing a sixfold suppression of the gate error with increased energy relaxation, and a fourfold suppression with increased dephasing noise. The results demonstrate that bosonic logical qubits can be controlled by error-prone ancilla qubits without inheriting the ancilla's inferior performance. As such, error-corrected ancilla-enabled gates are an important step towards fully fault-tolerant processing of bosonic qubits.

[1]  Eliot Kapit,et al.  Error-Transparent Quantum Gates for Small Logical Qubit Architectures. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[2]  Liang Jiang,et al.  Cavity State Manipulation Using Photon-Number Selective Phase Gates. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[3]  Liang Jiang,et al.  Entanglement of bosonic modes through an engineered exchange interaction , 2018, Nature.

[4]  Dorit Aharonov,et al.  Fault-tolerant Quantum Computation with Constant Error Rate * , 1999 .

[5]  Stephen D. Bartlett,et al.  Braiding defects in topological stabiliser codes of any dimension cannot be universal , 2018, 1811.11789.

[6]  John M. Martinis,et al.  State preservation by repetitive error detection in a superconducting quantum circuit , 2015, Nature.

[7]  Victor V. Albert,et al.  Dynamically protected cat-qubits: a new paradigm for universal quantum computation , 2013, 1312.2017.

[8]  D. Leung,et al.  Methodology for quantum logic gate construction , 2000, quant-ph/0002039.

[9]  Andrew W. Cross,et al.  Demonstration of a quantum error detection code using a square lattice of four superconducting qubits , 2015, Nature Communications.

[10]  L Frunzio,et al.  Gated Conditional Displacement Readout of Superconducting Qubits. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[11]  Caroline Figgatt,et al.  Fault-tolerant quantum error detection , 2016, Science Advances.

[12]  J. Preskill Fault-tolerant quantum computation , 1997, quant-ph/9712048.

[13]  Ling Hu,et al.  Quantum error correction and universal gate set operation on a binomial bosonic logical qubit , 2018, Nature Physics.

[14]  M. Mariantoni,et al.  Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation , 2012, 1208.0928.

[15]  Mazyar Mirrahimi,et al.  Extending the lifetime of a quantum bit with error correction in superconducting circuits , 2016, Nature.

[16]  Bryan Eastin,et al.  Restrictions on transversal encoded quantum gate sets. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[17]  Yvonne Y Gao,et al.  Entangling Bosonic Modes via an Engineered Exchange Interaction , 2020 .

[18]  Mazyar Mirrahimi,et al.  Repetition Cat Qubits for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation , 2019 .

[19]  R. Blatt,et al.  Quantum computations on a topologically encoded qubit , 2014, Science.

[20]  Andrew M. Steane,et al.  Fault-tolerant logical gate networks for Calderbank-Shor-Steane codes , 2003, quant-ph/0311014.

[21]  R. J. Schoelkopf,et al.  Tracking photon jumps with repeated quantum non-demolition parity measurements , 2013, Nature.

[22]  B. Terhal,et al.  Roads towards fault-tolerant universal quantum computation , 2016, Nature.

[23]  Robin Harper,et al.  Fault-Tolerant Logical Gates in the IBM Quantum Experience. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[24]  M Steffen,et al.  Efficient measurement of quantum gate error by interleaved randomized benchmarking. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[25]  Y. Xu,et al.  Error-transparent operations on a logical qubit protected by quantum error correction , 2019, Nature Physics.

[26]  Liang Jiang,et al.  Universal control of an oscillator with dispersive coupling to a qubit , 2015, 1502.08015.

[27]  M. A. Rol,et al.  Repeated quantum error correction on a continuously encoded qubit by real-time feedback , 2015, Nature Communications.

[28]  J. Preskill,et al.  Encoding a qubit in an oscillator , 2000, quant-ph/0008040.

[29]  Liang Jiang,et al.  Implementing a universal gate set on a logical qubit encoded in an oscillator , 2016, Nature Communications.

[30]  Liang Jiang,et al.  New class of quantum error-correcting codes for a bosonic mode , 2016, 1602.00008.

[31]  Andrew W. Cross,et al.  Experimental Demonstration of Fault-Tolerant State Preparation with Superconducting Qubits. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[32]  A. Kitaev,et al.  Universal quantum computation with ideal Clifford gates and noisy ancillas (14 pages) , 2004, quant-ph/0403025.

[33]  Liang Jiang,et al.  Fault-tolerant detection of a quantum error , 2018, Science.

[34]  V. Negnevitsky,et al.  Encoding a qubit in a trapped-ion mechanical oscillator , 2018, Nature.