Strategies for Coexistence in Molecular Communication

Some of the most ambitious applications of molecular communications are expected to lie in nanomedicine and advanced manufacturing. In these domains, the molecular communication system is surrounded by a range of biochemical processes, some of which may be sensitive to chemical species used for communication. Under these conditions, the biological system and the molecular communication system impact each other. As such, the problem of coexistence arises, where both the reliability of the molecular communication system and the function of the biological system must be ensured. In this paper, we study this problem with a focus on interactions with biological systems equipped with chemosensing mechanisms, which arises in a large class of biological systems. We motivate the problem by considering chemosensing mechanisms arising in bacteria chemotaxis, a ubiquitous and well-understood class of biological systems. We, then, propose strategies for a molecular communication system to minimize the disruption of biological system equipped with a chemosensing mechanism. This is achieved by exploiting tools from the theory of chemical reaction networks. To investigate the capabilities of our strategies, we obtain fundamental information theoretic limits by establishing a new connection with the problem of covert communications.

[1]  Ann M Stock,et al.  Two-component signal transduction. , 2000, Annual review of biochemistry.

[2]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[3]  Y. Koucheryavy,et al.  The internet of Bio-Nano things , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[4]  Youssef Chahibi,et al.  Molecular communication for drug delivery systems: A survey , 2017, Nano Commun. Networks.

[5]  Trung Q. Duong,et al.  Event Detection in Molecular Communication Networks With Anomalous Diffusion , 2017, IEEE Communications Letters.

[6]  Özgür B. Akan,et al.  Body area nanonetworks with molecular communications in nanomedicine , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[7]  Eduard Alarcón,et al.  The Molecular Communications Markup Language (MolComML) , 2018, Nano Commun. Networks.

[8]  Pietro Liò,et al.  Applications of molecular communications to medicine: A survey , 2016, Nano Commun. Networks.

[9]  Gheorghe Craciun,et al.  Mathematical Analysis of Chemical Reaction Systems , 2018, 1805.10371.

[10]  A. Vasilakos,et al.  Molecular Communication Among Biological Nanomachines: A Layered Architecture and Research Issues , 2014, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[11]  D. Clapham,et al.  Calcium signaling , 1995, Cell.

[12]  M. Feinberg,et al.  Structural Sources of Robustness in Biochemical Reaction Networks , 2010, Science.

[13]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  Hiding information in noise: fundamental limits of covert wireless communication , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[14]  Özgür B. Akan,et al.  Receiver Design for Molecular Communication , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[15]  Matthieu R. Bloch,et al.  Covert Communication Over Noisy Channels: A Resolvability Perspective , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[16]  Bin Li,et al.  Local Convexity Inspired Low-Complexity Noncoherent Signal Detector for Nanoscale Molecular Communications , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[17]  Giancarlo Fortino,et al.  On the Interaction between a Nanoparticulate System and the Human Body in Body Area Nanonetworks , 2015, Micromachines.

[18]  Sebastian Magierowski,et al.  Blind Synchronization in Diffusion-Based Molecular Communication Channels , 2013, IEEE Communications Letters.

[19]  B. Bassler,et al.  Quorum sensing in bacteria. , 2001, Annual review of microbiology.

[20]  Andrew W. Eckford,et al.  A Comprehensive Survey of Recent Advancements in Molecular Communication , 2014, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[21]  Tadashi Nakano,et al.  Molecular Communication , 2005 .

[22]  Raviraj S. Adve,et al.  Molecular Communication in Fluid Media: The Additive Inverse Gaussian Noise Channel , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[23]  Abdelhakim Hafid,et al.  Simulating with AcCoRD: Actor-based Communication via Reaction-Diffusion , 2016, Nano Commun. Networks.

[24]  M. Feinberg Chemical reaction network structure and the stability of complex isothermal reactors—I. The deficiency zero and deficiency one theorems , 1987 .

[25]  Trung Quang Duong,et al.  Coexistence in molecular communications , 2018, Nano Commun. Networks.

[26]  Vahid Jamali,et al.  Non-Coherent Detection for Diffusive Molecular Communication Systems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[27]  Andrea J. Goldsmith,et al.  Breaking Spectrum Gridlock With Cognitive Radios: An Information Theoretic Perspective , 2009, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[28]  A. Vasilakos,et al.  Molecular Communication and Networking: Opportunities and Challenges , 2012, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[29]  Robert Schober,et al.  Improving Receiver Performance of Diffusive Molecular Communication With Enzymes , 2013, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[30]  S. Chervitz,et al.  The two-component signaling pathway of bacterial chemotaxis: a molecular view of signal transduction by receptors, kinases, and adaptation enzymes. , 1997, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[31]  Yi Lu,et al.  Comparison of Channel Coding Schemes for Molecular Communications Systems , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[32]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory: Cover/Elements of Information Theory, Second Edition , 2005 .

[33]  U. Alon,et al.  Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis , 2022 .

[34]  H. Jäckle,et al.  From gradients to stripes in Drosophila embryogenesis: filling in the gaps. , 1996, Trends in genetics : TIG.