Exploring variability in pedestrian exposure to fine particulates (PM2.5) along a busy road

Abstract In August 2006, pedestrian exposure to PM 2.5 was monitored along a busy roadway in Sydney, Australia. The objective of the campaign was to assess the factors affecting exposure at both an inter- and intra-trip level. PM 2.5 measurements were made at second-by-second intervals using a portable aerosol monitor, while simultaneously recording location with a personal GPS device. A digital voice recorder was used to record any events or circumstances, perceived to notably increase potential PM 2.5 levels. The average PM 2.5 concentration for the 39 trips conducted was 12.8 μg m −3 , which while 40% higher than concurrent ambient measurements was well within proposed daily standards for Australia. Multivariate time-series methods were then applied to study the effects of various interventions on PM 2.5 at an intra-trip level while controlling for autocorrelation. Wind speed, traffic volumes and clearway operations (independent of traffic volumes) were found to be significant predictors in addition to the previous PM 2.5 concentrations. Sensitivity analysis showed doubling traffic volumes increased PM 2.5 concentrations by 26%, while each 5 km h −1 increase in wind speed increased PM 2.5 concentrations by 10%. Several PM 2.5 hotspots were identified where concentrations exceeded 100 μg m −3 . These were attributed to specific traffic (intersections, trucks, buses) and non-traffic sources (pedestrians smoking), typically only lasting a few seconds.

[1]  S. Horvath,et al.  Air-pollutant chemicals and oxidized lipids exhibit genome-wide synergistic effects on endothelial cells , 2007, Genome Biology.

[2]  Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen,et al.  Fine particle (PM2.5) personal exposure levels in transport microenvironments, London, UK. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  R. Colvile,et al.  Fine particle (PM2.5) personal exposure levels in transport microenvironments, London, UK. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  R. Tsay,et al.  Outliers in multivariate time series , 2000 .

[5]  Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen,et al.  Fine particulate matter and carbon monoxide exposure concentrations in urban street transport microenvironments , 2007 .

[6]  Mukesh Khare,et al.  Performance evaluation of general finite line source model for Delhi traffic conditions , 1999 .

[7]  Stephen Greaves,et al.  Analysis of minute-by-minute exposure to fine particulates inside a car – A time-series modelling approach , 2007 .

[8]  Trevor D. Davies,et al.  Regression and stochastic models for air pollution—I. Review, comments and suggestions , 1994 .

[9]  S. Greaves,et al.  Variability of exposure to fine particulates while cycling , 2006 .

[10]  David Briggs,et al.  Personal exposure to particulate air pollution in transport microenvironments , 2004 .

[11]  G. W. Snedecor.  STATISTICAL METHODS , 1967 .

[12]  K. Pericleous,et al.  Modelling air quality in street canyons : a review , 2003 .

[13]  Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen,et al.  Pedestrian exposure to air pollution along a major road in Central London, UK , 2005 .

[14]  P. Young,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[15]  L. Dijkstra,et al.  Promoting safe walking and cycling to improve public health: lessons from The Netherlands and Germany. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[16]  Michael T. Kleinman,et al.  Incidence and Apparent Health Significance of Brief Airborne Particle Excursions , 2000 .

[17]  Peter Höppe,et al.  Health effects of particles in ambient air. , 2004, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[18]  Stephen Greaves,et al.  Analysis of minute-by-minute pollution exposure inside a car: a time-series modelling approach , 2006 .

[19]  M. Marcellino.  Pooling‐Based Data Interpolation and Backdating , 2005 .

[20]  S. Greaves.  Variability of Personal Exposure to Fine Particulates for Urban Commuters inside Automobiles , 2006 .