Clothing insulation and temperature, layer and mass of clothing under comfortable environmental conditions

This study was designed to investigate the relationship between the microclimate temperature and clothing insulation (Icl) under comfortable environmental conditions. In total, 20 subjects (13 women, 7 men) took part in this study. Four environmental temperatures were chosen: 14°C (to represent March/April), 25°C (May/June), 29°C (July/August), and 23°C (September/October). Wind speed (0.14ms-1) and humidity (45%) were held constant. Clothing microclimate temperatures were measured at the chest (Tchest) and on the interscapular region (Tscapular). Clothing temperature of the innermost layer (Tinnermost) was measured on this layer 30 mm above the centre of the left breast. Subjects were free to choose the clothing that offered them thermal comfort under each environmental condition. We found the following results. 1) All clothing factors except the number of lower clothing layers (Llower), showed differences between the different environmental conditions (P<0.05). The ranges of Tchest were 31.6 to 33.5°C and 32.2 to 33.4°C in Tscapular. The range of Tinnermost was 28.6 to 32.0°C. The range of the upper clothing layers (Lupper) and total clothing mass (Mtotal) was 1.1 to 3.2 layers and 473 to 1659 g respectively. The range of Icl was 0.78 to 2.10 clo. 2) Post hoc analyses showed that analysis of Tinnermost produced the same results as for that of Icl. Likewise, the analysis of Lupper produced the same result as the analysis of the number of total layers (Ltotal) within an outfit. 3) Air temperature (ta) had positive relationships with Tchest and Tscapular and with Tinnermost but had inverse correlations with Icl, Mtotal, Lupper and Ltotal. Tchest, Tscapular, and Tinnermost increased as ta rose. 4) Icl had inverse relationships with Tchest and Tinnermost, but positive relationships with Mtotal, Lupper and Ltotal. Icl could be estimated by Mtotal, Lupper, and Tscapular using a multivariate linear regression model. 5) Lupper had positive relationships with Icl and Mtotal, but Llower did not. Subjects hardly changed Llower under environmental comfort conditions between March and October. This indicates that each of the Tchest, Mtotal, and Lupper was a factor in predicting Icl. Tinnermost might also be a more influential factor than the clothing microclimate temperature.

[1]  D. DuBois,et al.  A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known , 1989 .

[2]  D. D. Bois,et al.  CLINICAL CALORIMETRY: TENTH PAPER A FORMULA TO ESTIMATE THE APPROXIMATE SURFACE AREA IF HEIGHT AND WEIGHT BE KNOWN , 1916 .

[3]  H C Bazett,et al.  A PRACTICAL SYSTEM OF UNITS FOR THE DESCRIPTION OF THE HEAT EXCHANGE OF MAN WITH HIS ENVIRONMENT. , 1941, Science.

[4]  L. Greenberg.  Temperature and Human Life , 1950 .

[5]  Experimental Study on the Thermal Insulation of Woman's Korean-Styled Clothes under Still Air Condition -by the Instrumented Copper Mannequin on Standing-posture- , 1977 .

[6]  G. T. Holmes,et al.  Handbook on Clothing: Biomedical Effects of Military Clothing and Equipment Systems , 1988 .

[7]  W. Chow.  Estimation of Air Temperature Induced by a Heat Source in a Compartment with Displacement Ventilation , 1995 .

[8]  I Holmér,et al.  Effects of two kinds of underwear on thermophysiological responses and clothing microclimate during 30 min walking and 60 min recovery in the cold. , 1996, Applied human science : journal of physiological anthropology.

[9]  Diagnosis of Collegian's Adaptation Level for Autumn Environment , 1999 .

[10]  Clothing Microclimate and Subjective Sensation according to Wearing Hanbok of Korean and Japanese , 2001 .

[11]  G. Donaldson,et al.  Outdoor clothing: its relationship to geography, climate, behaviour and cold-related mortality in Europe , 2001, International journal of biometeorology.

[12]  Kamel Ghali,et al.  Ventilation rates of micro-climate air annulus of the clothing-skin system under periodic motion , 2005 .

[13]  Ingvar Holmér,et al.  Environmental Ergonomics XI , 2005 .

[14]  George Havenith,et al.  Regional microclimate humidity of clothing during light work as a result of the interaction between local sweat production and ventilation , 2006 .

[15]  Heecheon You,et al.  Development and Application of an Ergonomic Evaluation System for Functional Clothing: Evaluation of Flame-proof Clothing and Identification of Design Problems , 2007 .

[16]  A. Wong,et al.  Impact of Fabric Moisture Transport Properties on Physiological Responses when Wearing Protective Clothing , 2008 .

[17]  W. Jeong.  Seasonal Comparison in Thermal Comfort of the Human Body , 2010 .

[18]  JuYoun Kwon,et al.  The relationship between environmental temperature and clothing insulation across a year , 2012, International Journal of Biometeorology.