Top management departures in cross-border acquisitions: Governance issues in an international context

This study examined top management team departures in U.S. manufacturing firms acquired by a foreign multinational during the six-year period following acquisition. Results indicated that greater cultural distance between the United States and the home country of the foreign multinational, higher levels of international integration in the target industry, and poor preacquisition performance in the U.S. target company were related to greater postacquisition top management departures. These effects were moderated significantly by the foreign acquirer's international business and U.S. acquisition experience and showed different patterns over the short-term, intermediate-term, and long-term. Implications for future research on top management teams involved in cross-border acquisitions are discussed.

[1]  Scott Shane,et al.  National Cultural Distance and Cross-Border Acquisition Performance , 1998 .

[2]  Stephen J. Kobrin,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE DETERMINANTS OF GLOBAL INTEGRATION , 1991 .

[3]  H. Varian.  Symposium on Takeovers , 1988 .

[4]  V. Sharan.  Theories of International Business , 1995 .

[5]  Robert Doktor,et al.  From the Atlantic to the Pacific Century: Cross-Cultural Management Reviewed , 1986 .

[6]  J. Jaccard,et al.  Interaction effects in multiple regression , 1992 .

[7]  Jerold B. Warner,et al.  Stock prices and top management changes , 1988 .

[8]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Relative standing and the performance of recently acquired European firms , 1997 .

[9]  M. Weisbach.  Outside directors and CEO turnover , 1988 .

[10]  Sabine Reddy,et al.  The choice between mergers/acquisitions and joint ventures : The case of Japanese investors in the United States , 1997 .

[11]  W. Davidson.  The Location of Foreign Direct Investment Activity: Country Characteristics and Experience Effects , 1980 .

[12]  Luis R. Gomez-Mejia,et al.  Structure and process of diversification, compensation strategy, and firm performance , 1992 .

[13]  Stewart D. Friedman,et al.  CEO SUCCESSION AND STOCKHOLDER REACTION: THE INFLUENCE OF ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT AND EVENT CONTENT , 1989 .

[14]  M. Casson,et al.  The Economic Theory of the Multinational Enterprise , 1985 .

[15]  Anne T. Coughlan,et al.  Executive compensation, management turnover, and firm performance: An empirical investigation , 1985 .

[16]  L. Donaldson.  Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations , 1997 .

[17]  A. Morrison,et al.  Implementing Global Strategy: Characteristics of Global Subsidiary Mandates , 1992 .

[18]  Donald C. Hambrick,et al.  Effects of executive departures on the performance of acquired firms , 1993 .

[19]  L. G. Hrebiniak.  Implementing global strategies , 1992 .

[20]  S. Lieberson,et al.  Leadership and organizational performance: a study of large corporations. , 1972, American sociological review.

[21]  Gerald F. Davis,et al.  Organization Theory and the Market for Corporate Control: A Dynamic Analysis of the Characteristics of Large Takeover Targets, 1980-1990 , 1992 .

[22]  L. Lowenstein.  Pruning Deadwood in Hostile Takeovers: A Proposal for Legislation , 1983 .

[23]  Bruce Kogut,et al.  Normative Observations on the International Value-Added Chain and Strategic Groups , 1984 .

[24]  J. Walsh.  Top management turnover following mergers and acquisitions , 1988 .

[25]  R. Cyert,et al.  Theory of the Firm , 1966 .

[26]  J. Hennart,et al.  The Impact of Culture on the Strategy of Multinational Enterprises: Does National Origin Affect Ownership Decisions? , 1998 .

[27]  A. Rugman,et al.  New Theories of the Multinational Enterprise , 1983 .

[28]  James A. Brickley,et al.  The Market for Corporate Control: The Empirical Evidence Since 1980 , 1988 .

[29]  Albert A. Cannella,et al.  Agency problems as antecedents to unrelated mergers and diversification: Amihud and Lev reconsidered , 1998 .

[30]  James P. Walsh,et al.  Doing a deal: Merger and acquisition negotiations and their impact upon target company top management turnover , 1989 .

[31]  Geir Gripsrud,et al.  The Expansion of Foreign Direct Investments: Discrete Rational Location Choices or a Cultural Learning Process? , 1992 .

[32]  Harbir Singh,et al.  The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode , 1988 .

[33]  Luis R. Gomez-Mejia,et al.  Effect of Occupation on Task Related, Contextual and Job Involvement Orientation: A Cross-Cultural Perspective , 1984 .

[34]  Kenneth B. Schwartz,et al.  Executive Succession in Failing Firms , 1985 .

[35]  E. Fama,et al.  Separation of Ownership and Control , 1983, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[36]  D. Ravenscraft,et al.  The 1980s merger wave: an industrial organization perspective , 1987 .

[37]  Deepak K. Datta.  Organizational fit and acquisition performance: Effects of post-acquisition integration , 1991 .

[38]  M. Casson,et al.  The future of the multinational enterprise , 1977 .

[39]  James P. Walsh,et al.  Mergers, acquisitions, and the pruning of managerial deadwood , 1991 .

[40]  Peter J. Buckley,et al.  New Theories of International Business: Some Unresolved Issues , 1989 .

[41]  S. Ghoshal.  Global strategy: An organizing framework , 1987 .

[42]  Robert Doktor,et al.  From the Atlantic to the Pacific Century , 1989 .

[43]  Peter J. Buckley,et al.  The Limits of Explanation: Testing the Internalization Theory of the Multinationial Enterprise , 1988 .

[44]  The Takeover Controversy , 1988 .

[45]  M. Erramilli,et al.  Nationality and Subsidiary Ownership Patterns in Multinational Corporations , 1996 .

[46]  Harry DeAngelo,et al.  Managerial ownership of voting rights: A study of public corporations with dual classes of common stock☆ , 1985 .

[47]  Sea Jin Chang,et al.  International Expansion Strategy of Japanese Firms: Capability Building through Sequential Entry , 1995 .

[48]  Robert T. Moran.  Managing Cultural Differences , 1979 .

[49]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Horses for Courses: Organizational Forms for Multinational Corporations , 1993 .

[50]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Effects of ownership and performance on executive tenure in U , 1980 .

[51]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Differentiated fit and shared values: Alternatives for managing headquarters‐subsidiary relations , 1994 .

[52]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments , 1977 .

[53]  C. K. Prahalad,et al.  Globalization: The intellectual and managerial challenges , 1990 .

[54]  Amy L. Pablo.  Determinants of acquisition integration level: A decision-making perspective. , 1994 .

[55]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  How Global Companies Win Out , 1982 .

[56]  Hema A. Krishnan,et al.  DIVERSIFICATION AND TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM COMPLEMENTARITY: IS PERFORMANCE IMPROVED BY MERGING SIMILAR OR DISSIMILAR TEAMS? , 1997 .

[57]  John E. Delery,et al.  An organization-level analysis of voluntary and involuntary turnover. , 1998 .

[58]  S. Sitkin,et al.  Corporate Acquisitions: A Process Perspective , 1986 .

[59]  James P. Walsh,et al.  Corporate Raiders and their Disciplinary Role in the Market for Corporate Control , 1993 .

[60]  Kendall Roth,et al.  Foreign Subsidiary Compensation Strategy: An Agency Theory Perspective , 1996 .

[61]  Michael C. Jensen,et al.  The market for corporate control , 1983 .

[62]  Leslie E. Palich,et al.  Cultural Diversity and the Performance of Multinational Firms , 1997 .

[63]  J. Hennart,et al.  The transaction costs theory of joint ventures: an empirical study of Japanese subsidiaries in the united states , 1991 .

[64]  Donald C. Hambrick,et al.  Relative Standing: A Framework for Understanding Departures of Acquired Executives , 1993 .

[65]  W. Harvey Hegarty,et al.  Postacquisition turnover among U.S. top management teams: an analysis of the effects of foreign vs. domestic acquisitions of U.S. targets , 1997 .

[66]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[67]  Kathryn L. Dewenter.  Are Intra-Industry Investment Patterns Consistent with Cost Disadvantages to Cross-Border Investing? Evidence from the U.S. Chemical Industry , 1995 .

[68]  R. Swinburne.  Explanation and its Limits: The Limits of Explanation , 1991 .

[69]  Sanjeev Agarwal,et al.  Socio-Cultural Distance and the Choice of Joint Ventures: A Contingency Perspective , 1994 .

[70]  Richard S. Ruback,et al.  The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence , 2002 .

[71]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[72]  Bruce Kogut,et al.  Research notes and communications a note on global strategies , 1989 .

[73]  Robert S. Harris,et al.  The Role of Acquisitions in Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from the U.S. Stock Market , 1991 .

[74]  James Leontiales,et al.  Going global—Global strategies vs national strategies , 1986 .

[75]  P. Buckley.  Problems and Developments in the Core Theory of International Business , 1990 .

[76]  Jiatao Li.  Foreign entry and survival: effects of strategic choices on performance in international markets , 1995 .

[77]  Renée Mauborgne,et al.  Procedural justice and managers' in-role and extra-role behavior: the case of the multinational , 1996 .

[78]  David A. Belsley,et al.  Conditioning Diagnostics: Collinearity and Weak Data in Regression , 1991 .

[79]  Scott Shane,et al.  Uncertainty Avoidance and the Preference for Innovation Championing Roles , 1995 .

[80]  A. Rugman,et al.  NEW THEORIES OF THE MULTXNATIONAL ENTERPRISE: AN ASSESSMENT OF INTERNALIZATION THEORY , 1986 .

[81]  Mason A. Carpenter,et al.  Internationalization and Firm Governance: The Roles of CEO Compensation, Top Team Composition, and Board Structure , 1998 .