Biological Motion Shown Backwards: The Apparent-Facing Effect

We examined how showing a film backwards (reverse transformation) affects the visual perception of biological motion. Adults and 6-year-old children saw first a point-light quadruped moving normally as if on a treadmill, and then saw the same display in reverse transformation. For other groups the order of presentation was the opposite. Irrespective of the presentation mode (normal or reverse) and of the facing of the point-light figure (rightward or leftward), a pronounced apparent-facing effect was observed: the perceptual identification of a display was mainly determined by the apparent direction of locomotion. The findings suggest that in interpreting impoverished point-light biological-motion stimuli the visual system may neglect distortions caused by showing a film backwards. This property appears to be robust across perceptual development. Possible explanations of the apparent-facing effect are discussed.

[1]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Recognition of Point-Light Biological Motion Displays by Young Children , 2001, Perception.

[2]  K. Verfaillie.  Perceiving Human Locomotion: Priming Effects in Direction Discrimination , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[3]  M. Pavlova,et al.  Orientation specificity in biological motion perception , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  F. Pollick,et al.  Exaggerating Temporal Differences Enhances Recognition of Individuals from Point Light Displays , 2000, Psychological science.

[5]  R. Blake,et al.  Perception of coherent motion, biological motion and form-from-motion under dim-light conditions , 1999, Vision Research.

[6]  K. Morikawa,et al.  Symmetry and elongation of objects influence perceived direction of translational motion , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  David C. Burr,et al.  Seeing biological motion , 1998, Nature.

[8]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  The visual perception of human locomotion. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[9]  J Faubert,et al.  Independence of Contour and Biological-Motion Cues for Motion-Defined Animal Shapes , 1998, Perception.

[10]  R. Blake,et al.  Perception of Biological Motion , 1997, Perception.

[11]  L J Bernstein,et al.  Direction of motion influences perceptual identification of ambiguous figures. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Maggie Shiffrar,et al.  The perception of biological motion across apertures , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  K. Verfaillie.  Orientation-dependent priming effects in the perception of biological motion. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  G. Mather,et al.  Recognition of Animal Locomotion from Dynamic Point-Light Displays , 1993, Perception.

[15]  Michael K. McBeath,et al.  Perceptual Bias for Forward-Facing Motion , 1992 .

[16]  G. Mather,et al.  Low-level visual processing of biological motion , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  M. Pavlova,et al.  Changing a natural orientation: recognition of biological motion pattern by children and adults , 1990 .

[18]  J E Cutting,et al.  Masking the motions of human gait , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  D R Proffitt,et al.  The development of infant sensitivity to biomechanical motions. , 1985, Child development.

[20]  M K Kaiser,et al.  The development of sensitivity to causally relevant dynamic information. , 1984, Child development.

[21]  S. Runeson,et al.  Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: Expe , 1983 .

[22]  R. Fox,et al.  The perception of biological motion by human infants. , 1982, Science.

[23]  J. Cutting,et al.  Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display , 1977 .

[25]  G. Johansson.  Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[26]  L. Brosgole,et al.  The effect of meaning on the allocation of visually induced movement , 1967 .

[27]  J J Gibson,et al.  The problem of temporal order in stimulation and perception. , 1966, The Journal of psychology.

[28]  A. McNeil.  The Development of the Infant , 1890, The Homoeopathic physician.