Sensitivity loss in odd-symmetric mechanisms and phase anomalies in peripheral vision

The ability to detect, discriminate and identify spatial stimuli is much poorer in the peripheral than in the central visual field. Some deficits are eliminated by scaling stimulus size. For example, grating detectibility is roughly constant across the visual field when spatial frequency and target extent are scaled appropriately1,2. Other deficits persist despite scaling. For instance, some readily detectable patterns are more difficult to identify peripherally than in the fovea3,4. This deficit is caused, at least partially, by a reduced ability to encode spatial phase (or relative position)5–7. To specify the properties of foveal and peripheral phase-encoding mechanisms, we measured discrimination thresholds for compound gratings at several eccentricities. Our observations are consistent with a two-channel model of phase encoding based on even- and odd-symmetric mechanisms8 (see Fig. 1), but the sensitivity of the odd-symmetric mechanisms decreases dramatically with eccentricity. Thus, the loss of sensitivity in one type of mechanism may underlie the reduced ability to encode spatial phase peripherally.

[1]  John Merchant Sampling theory for the human visual sense. , 1965 .

[2]  D. Tolhurst On the possible existence of edge detector neurones in the human visual system , 1972 .

[3]  B. Julesz,et al.  Spatial-frequency masking in vision: critical bands and spread of masking. , 1972, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[4]  C. Stromeyer,et al.  Spatial frequency phase effects in human vision. , 1973, Vision research.

[5]  R. M. Shapley,et al.  Edge detectors in human vision , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  S. Klein,et al.  Spatial frequency channels in human vision as asymmetric (edge) mechanisms. , 1974, Vision research.

[7]  J. Nachmias,et al.  Discrimination of simple and complex gratings , 1975, Vision Research.

[8]  M. A. Bouman,et al.  Perimetry of contrast detection thresholds of moving spatial sine wave patterns. III. The target extent as a sensitivity controlling parameter. , 1978, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[9]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Interactions between spatial frequency channels , 1978, Vision Research.

[10]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Lateral masking in foveal and eccentric vision , 1978, Vision Research.

[11]  J. Rovamo,et al.  Cortical magnification factor predicts the photopic contrast sensitivity of peripheral vision , 1978, Nature.

[12]  B. Julesz Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions , 1981, Nature.

[13]  D. Field,et al.  Phase reversal discrimination , 1984, Vision Research.

[14]  T. B. Lawton,et al.  The effect of phase structures on spatial phase discrimination , 1984, Vision Research.

[15]  A J Ahumada,et al.  Model of human visual-motion sensing. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[16]  Ingo Rentschler,et al.  Loss of spatial phase relationships in extrafoveal vision , 1985, Nature.

[17]  T. B. Lawton Spatial-frequency spectrum of patterns changes the visibility of spatial-phase differences. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[18]  S. Klein,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification , 1985, Vision Research.

[19]  R. J. Watt,et al.  Psychophysics: Structured representation in low-level vision , 1985, Nature.

[20]  J. van Santen,et al.  Elaborated Reichardt detectors. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  MARGARET S. LIVINGSTONE,et al.  Spatial relationship and extrafoveal vision , 1985, Nature.

[22]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Detection and discrimination of sinusoidal grating displacements. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[23]  D. Burr,et al.  Mach bands are phase dependent , 1986, Nature.