Modeling the links between need for cognition and the acquisition of a complex skill

Abstract Need for cognition (NFC) refers to the tendency for individuals to engage in and enjoy effortful cognitive activity (Cacioppo & Petty, 1982). Much of the research on NFC has been concerned with information-processing in situations involving persuasion and argumentation. Despite conceptual underpinnings suggesting NFC could be a potential determinant of complex skill acquisition, little empirical research has examined the role of NFC in training or skill acquisition contexts. Therefore, the purpose of this laboratory study was to test the proposition that NFC is a trait-like motivational construct that distally influences complex skill acquisition through more proximal motivational states. Accordingly, 411 young adult males trained for 5 h on a novel and complex computer task that involved strong cognitive and psychomotor demands. Performance feedback was provided throughout training with monetary incentives for high performance. In addition to NFC, participants completed measures of state goal orientation, self-efficacy, and general cognitive ability ( g ). The results supported our proposition and showed that NFC was associated with, but distinguishable from g and linked to skill acquisition through the mediating roles of learning orientation and self-efficacy.

[1]  Jeffrey A. Jordan,et al.  Visual attention: Individual differences in training and predicting complex task performance , 1995 .

[2]  A. Saks,et al.  Training in the 21st century: Some lessons from the last one. , 1998 .

[3]  R. Snow,et al.  Lecture 2: Toward a Theory of Cognitive Aptitude for Learning from Instruction , 1984 .

[4]  Carol S. Dweck,et al.  Motivational processes affecting learning. , 1986 .

[5]  D. Gopher,et al.  Practice under changing priorities: An approach to the training of complex skills☆ , 1989 .

[6]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[7]  C. Utman,et al.  Performance Effects of Motivational State: A Meta-Analysis , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[8]  J. Colquitt,et al.  Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: a meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  E. Donchin,et al.  The space fortress game , 1989 .

[10]  A. Elliot,et al.  A HIERARCHICAL MODEL OF APPROACH AND AVOIDANCE ACHIEVEMENT MOTIVATION , 1997 .

[11]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[12]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  The Transfer of Skill from a Computer Game Trainer to Actual Flight , 1992 .

[13]  Shelly L. Gable,et al.  Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. , 1999 .

[14]  Roland T. Rust,et al.  Comparing covariance structure models: A general methodology , 1995 .

[15]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  DISPOSITIONAL DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE MOTIVATION : THE LIFE AND TIMES OF INDIVIDUALS VARYING IN NEED FOR COGNITION , 1996 .

[16]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Goal orientation and ability: interactive effects on self-efficacy, performance, and knowledge. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  Eric Anthony Day,et al.  Construct- and criterion-related validity of four commonly used goal orientation instruments. , 2003 .

[18]  Michael D. Berzonsky,et al.  Social-Cognitive Aspects of Identity Style , 1992 .

[19]  D. Day,et al.  Development of a Short form for the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices Test , 1994 .

[20]  J. J. Donovan,et al.  The Role of State Goal Orientation in the Goal Establishment Process , 2005 .

[21]  J. M. Olson,et al.  Uncertainty orientation and persuasion: Individual differences in the effects of personal relevance on social judgments. , 1988 .

[22]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Effects of Training Goals and Goal Orientation Traits on Multidimensional Training Outcomes and Performance Adaptability. , 2001, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[23]  Eric Anthony Day,et al.  Performance evaluations, need for cognition, and the acquisition of a complex skill: an attribute–treatment interaction , 2005 .

[24]  S. Dornič,et al.  Tolerance for mental effort: Self-ratings related to perception, performance and personality , 1991 .

[25]  D. Gopher,et al.  Transfer of Skill from a Computer Game Trainer to Flight , 1994 .

[26]  S. Gully,et al.  Role of goal orientation, ability, need for achievement, and locus of control in the self-efficacy and goal--setting process. , 1997 .

[27]  J. Raven,et al.  Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales , 1962 .

[28]  H. Marsh,et al.  Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. , 1985 .

[29]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[30]  A. Elliot,et al.  Test anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  James L. Arbuckle,et al.  Full Information Estimation in the Presence of Incomplete Data , 1996 .

[32]  D. Bors,et al.  Measuring the need for cognition: Item polarity, dimensionality, and the relation with ability , 2006 .

[33]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[34]  D. Vandewalle.  Development and Validation of a Work Domain Goal Orientation Instrument , 1997 .

[35]  G. A. Marcoulides,et al.  Advanced structural equation modeling : issues and techniques , 1996 .