Abstract. According to Brooke [3] “Usability does not exist in anyabsolute sense; it can only be defined with reference to particular con-texts.” That is, one cannot speak of usability without specifying what that particular usability is characterized by. Driven by the feedback ofa reviewer at an international conference, I explore in which way onecan precisely specify the kind of usability they are investigating in agiven setting. Finally, I come up with a formalism that defines usabil-ity as a quintuple comprising the elements level of usability metrics,product, users, goals and context of use. Providing concrete values forthese elements then constitutes the investigated type of usability. Theuse of this formalism is demonstrated in two case studies. 1 Introduction In 2014, I submitted a research paper about a concept called Usability-based SplitTesting 1 to a web engineering conference [10]. My evaluation involved a ques-tionnaire that asked for ratings of different factors of usability based on a novelusability instrument specifically developed for web interfaces [11]. This instru-ment comprises the items
[1]
Martin Gaedke,et al.
Ensuring Web Interface Quality through Usability-Based Split Testing
,
2014,
ICWE.
[2]
Alan Cooper,et al.
The Inmates Are Running the Asylum: Why High Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity (2nd Edition)
,
1999
.
[3]
Marc Hassenzahl,et al.
User experience (UX): towards an experiential perspective on product quality
,
2008,
IHM '08.
[4]
Virpi Roto,et al.
Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach
,
2009,
CHI.
[5]
J. B. Brooke,et al.
SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale
,
1996
.
[6]
Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals ( VDTs ) — Part 11 : Guidance on usability
,
1998
.
[7]
Anind K. Dey,et al.
Understanding and Using Context
,
2001,
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.
[8]
Luis Olsina,et al.
Quality, Quality in Use, Actual Usability and User Experience as Key Drivers for Web Application Evaluation
,
2010,
ICWE.
[9]
George Casaday,et al.
Inspections and design reviews: framework, history and reflection
,
1994
.
[10]
Martin Gaedke,et al.
Inuit: The Interface Usability Instrument
,
2015,
HCI.
[11]
Cathleen Wharton,et al.
The cognitive walkthrough method: a practitioner's guide
,
1994
.
[12]
ISO / IEC 25010 : 2011 Systems and software engineering — Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation ( SQuaRE ) — System and software quality models
,
2013
.