Experience and the life cycle: Some analytic implications

The importance of experience has been recognized by economists for many years. The notions of a product life cycle, and by extension, a technology life cycle, are also well established in both management and marketing literature. However, the two concepts have never been integrated into a single theoretical framework. This paper proposes such a framework. Moreover, it explores some interesting implications of simple life-cycle models that include explicit learning effects. One of them is that the rate of cost reduction attributable to accumulating production experience depends on life-cycle stage. This phenomenon has been frequently observed, but never previously explained. Another implication is that the probability of ‘lock out’ of a superior technology by an inferior competitor with a head start is an explicit function of only three rate model parameters: the discount rate (d), the cumulative experience growth rate (b), and the parameter relating cost to experience (m). Finally, the theory implies that market-share is attributable to technological knowledge—the consequence (in part) of learning from experience—and offers a means of measuring the value of ‘pure’ technology.

[1]  P. David Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[2]  W. E. G. Salter,et al.  Productivity and Technical Change. , 1961 .

[3]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[4]  N. Kaldor Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth , 1961 .

[5]  P. Conley Experience curves as a planning tool , 1970, IEEE Spectrum.

[6]  L. Rapping Learning and World War II Production Functions , 1965 .

[7]  K. Arrow Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[8]  T. P. Wright,et al.  Factors affecting the cost of airplanes , 1936 .

[9]  Louis T. Wells Test of a Product Cycle Model of International Trade: U. S. Exports of Consumer Durables , 1969 .

[10]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process , 1940 .

[11]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[12]  Thomas B. Cochran,et al.  Planning production costs: using the improvement curve , 1968 .

[13]  Paul A. David,et al.  Learning By Doing and Tariff Protection: A Reconsideration of the Case of the Ante-Bellum United States Cotton Textile Industry , 1970, The Journal of Economic History.

[14]  S. Magee Multinational Corporations, the Industry Technology Cycle and Development , 1977, Journal of World Trade.

[15]  T. Levitt EXPLOIT THE PRODUCT LIFE CYCLE , 1965 .

[16]  R. Vernon International investment and international trade in the product cycle , 1966 .

[17]  E. B. Alderfer,et al.  Economics of American industry , 1942 .

[18]  James A. Cunningham,et al.  Management: Using the learning curve as a management tool: The learning curve can help in preparing cost reduction programs, pricing forecasts, and product development goals , 1980, IEEE Spectrum.

[19]  P. J. Verdoorn COMPLEMENTARITY AND LONG-RANGE PROJECTIONS , 1956 .

[20]  Victor J. Cook,et al.  Validity of the Product Life Cycle , 1969 .

[21]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Corporate Life Cycle , 1984 .

[22]  L. Argote,et al.  Learning Curves in Manufacturing , 1990, Science.

[23]  Werner Z. Hirsch,et al.  Firm Progress Ratios , 1956 .

[24]  Devendra Sahal,et al.  Patterns of Technological Innovation , 1984 .

[25]  John C. V. Pezzey,et al.  Economic analysis of sustainable growth and sustainable development , 1989 .

[26]  A. Alchian Reliability of Progress Curves in Airframe Production , 1963 .