Demonstrating the Benefits of Green Streets for Active Aging: Final Report to EPA

Are residents living near sustainable streets more physically active in their Do residents living near sustainable streets interact with neighbors more and How do green streets affect stormwater flows, mitigate urban heat islands, and improve Introduction This aim of project was to demonstrate how " green " streets may contribute to the well-being of a community, including the physical and mental health of older and younger adults, along with the environment and economy. Green streets are streets that incorporate natural, landscape-based features that infiltrate, reuse, or evapotranspirate stormwater and accommodate multiple travel modes, particularly walking and bicycling (see Figure 1). Green streets are relatively new in practice. Therefore, there is very little published research directly evaluating their multiple potential benefits, particularly secondary benefits (e.g. effects on travel behavior and social interactions). The City of Portland, Oregon is a leader among U.S. cities in implementing green streets. Over the next decade, the City will invest $50 million on a " Grey to Green " campaign to build dozens more facilities. A primary objective of this research was to assess the relationship between green streets and physical activity, social interaction, and neighborhood social capital. The hypothesis is that the green street features may make a neighborhood better for walking and encourage more outdoor activity. This, in turn, may increase social interaction and capital. All of this could positively affect physical and mental health. We were particularly interested in examining potential differences between older (65 years and older) and younger adults. Secondary objectives including assessing the potential effect of green streets on home values and on the physical environment, namely changes in vegetation and stormwater flow. The project examined four areas, two where green streets had been installed (" treatment ") and two control areas and included four elements: (1) a walkability audits to assess features that affect the pedestrian experience; (2) surveys of residents; (3) an evaluation of relationship between home prices and green street features, using a hedonic pricing approach; and (4) an assessment of the environmental effects of the green street features. This report presents the findings from that research. The next section reviews existing research on green streets and similar infrastructure, along with the City of Portland's experience with green streets. That is followed by the specific research questions. The methodology section explains the selection of the study areas and all four methods employed. The findings are then presented, …

[1]  M. Kreuter,et al.  Social environment and physical activity: a review of concepts and evidence. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[2]  Noelwah R. Netusil,et al.  THE EFFECT OF OPEN SPACES ON A HOME'S SALE PRICE , 2001 .

[3]  L. L. Bennett,et al.  Valuing Open Space and Land-Use Patterns in Urban Watersheds , 2001 .

[4]  N. Christakis,et al.  The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network Over 32 Years , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  L. Berkman,et al.  Neighborhood effects on the self-rated health of elders: uncovering the relative importance of structural and service-related neighborhood environments. , 2006, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[6]  Susan L Handy,et al.  How the built environment affects physical activity: views from urban planning. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[7]  E. McAuley,et al.  Promoting physical activity among older adults: from ecology to the individual. , 2003, American journal of preventive medicine.

[8]  C. Nagel,et al.  The relation between neighborhood built environment and walking activity among older adults. , 2008, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  E. Mcpherson,et al.  Quantifying urban forest structure, function, and value: the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project , 1995, Urban Ecosystems.

[10]  F. Huffman,et al.  The Relative Impacts of Trails and Greenbelts on Home Price , 2009 .

[11]  Ming Wen,et al.  Objective and perceived neighborhood environment, individual SES and psychosocial factors, and self-rated health: an analysis of older adults in Cook County, Illinois. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[12]  K Nakamura,et al.  Urban residential environments and senior citizens’ longevity in megacity areas: the importance of walkable green spaces , 2002, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[13]  R. Kaplan,et al.  People needs in the urban landscape : Analysis of Landscape And Urban Planning contributions , 2008 .

[14]  H. Schroeder,et al.  Visual Quality of Residential Streets: Both Street and Yard Trees Make a Difference , 1987, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[15]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States , 2006 .

[16]  M. Marmot,et al.  Characteristics of individuals and characteristics of areas: investigating their influence on health in the Whitehall II study. , 2001, Health & place.

[17]  Steven Shea,et al.  Associations of neighborhood problems and neighborhood social cohesion with mental health and health behaviors: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. , 2008, Health & place.

[18]  Brent L. Mahan,et al.  Valuing Urban Wetlands: A Property Price Approach , 1996 .

[19]  J. Sallis,et al.  Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[20]  Ann Forsyth,et al.  Relation of modifiable neighborhood attributes to walking. , 2008, Preventive medicine.

[21]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. , 1997, Science.

[22]  Robert I. McDonald,et al.  Shades of Green: Measuring the Value of Urban Forests in the Housing Market , 2005 .

[23]  Hanyu Ni,et al.  Neighborhood Characteristics and Hypertension , 2008, Epidemiology.

[24]  A. Rundle,et al.  Children living in areas with more street trees have lower prevalence of asthma , 2008, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[25]  J. M. Oakes,et al.  Design and Destinations: Factors Influencing Walking and Total Physical Activity , 2008 .

[26]  H. Lund Testing the Claims of New Urbanism: Local Access, Pedestrian Travel, and Neighboring Behaviors , 2003 .

[27]  K. Cagney Neighborhood Age Structure and its Implications for Health , 2006, Journal of Urban Health.

[28]  P. Chisnall Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[29]  D. Civco Numerical modeling of eastern connecticut's visual resources , 1979 .

[30]  Lisa A. Cirill,et al.  Walkable Neighborhoods for Seniors: The Alameda County Experience , 2007 .

[31]  J. House,et al.  Social relationships and health. , 1988, Science.

[32]  Rita Berto,et al.  Assessing the restorative value of the environment: A study on the elderly in comparison with young adults and adolescents , 2007 .

[33]  R. Sampson,et al.  The Neighborhood Context of Well-Being , 2003, Perspectives in biology and medicine.

[34]  K. Leyden Social capital and the built environment: the importance of walkable neighborhoods. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[35]  William N. Cannon,et al.  The Esthetic Contribution of Trees to Residential Streets in Ohio Towns , 1983, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[36]  J. Sallis New thinking on older adults' physical activity. , 2003, American journal of preventive medicine.

[37]  S. Galea,et al.  Urban health: evidence, challenges, and directions. , 2005, Annual review of public health.