Public system usability analysis for the valuation of cognitive burden and interface standardization: A case study of cross-ATM design

ABSTRACT Humans are unable to effectively handle machines that have poor interface and interaction patterns. The Automated Teller Machine (ATM) is one of the machines that is most frequently operated by a wide spectrum of people. Hence, it is common to apply Human–Computer Interaction (HCI) technology in the design of ATMs. User–ATM interaction, however, has barriers such as a user’s working memory limit, lower literacy level, or lack of awareness and access. Moreover, the diversity of interfaces hurt user motivation, perception, and experience significantly. For example, each bank has its own ATM design targeting its customers only and, thus, when clients of other banks come across such a machine, they suffer from cognitive burden and commit many errors. To this end, we conduct an analytical survey of ATMs used in Pakistan through user analysis and heuristics analysis. We figure out the influence of design diversity and user perception on ATM users’ cognitive stress with the cognitive walkthrough analysis on the survey. We also uncover a realism-usability gap by reviewing the sampled ATM screens from the viewpoint of HCI heuristics. Finally, we suggest the guidelines on the cross-ATM design, characterized by the standardized fast-cash menu and the fail-safe mechanism for novices. This study demonstrates that users are reluctant to switch out of their comfort zones, due to learning costs and a lack of motivation. Therefore, we should design public systems in a very standardized way, which becomes more crucial for a user’s cognitive relief as interface and design patterns are becoming more diverse in our daily lives.

[1]  J. J. Po-An Hsieh,et al.  Motivational Differences Across Post-Acceptance Information System Usage Behaviors: An Investigation in the Business Intelligence Systems Context , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Khalid Al-Saleh,et al.  An Ergonomics Evaluation of Certain ATM Dimensions , 2013, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[3]  W. Buxton Human-Computer Interaction , 1988, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[4]  H. Issahaku,et al.  Challenges of Electronic Payment Systems in Ghana: The Case of e-ZWICH , 2012 .

[5]  Automated Teller Machine: A New Dimension in the Bank Services of Bangladesh , 2005 .

[6]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Quo vadis TAM? , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Nagul Cooharojananone,et al.  Usability Comparisons of Seven Main Functions for Automated Teller Machine (ATM) Banking Service of Five Banks in Thailand , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications.

[8]  Philipp Koehn,et al.  Cognitive Psychology , 1992, Ageing and Society.

[9]  R. Rugimbana Predicting automated teller machine usage: the relative importance of perceptual and demographic factors , 1995 .

[10]  Yajiong Xue,et al.  Avoidance of Information Technology Threats: A Theoretical Perspective , 2009, MIS Q..

[11]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[12]  Cathleen Wharton,et al.  The cognitive walkthrough method: a practitioner's guide , 1994 .

[13]  Charles Mwatsika Customers satisfaction with ATM banking in Malawi , 2014 .

[14]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Extending the two‐stage information systems continuance model: incorporating UTAUT predictors and the role of context , 2011, Inf. Syst. J..

[15]  Andrew Thatcher,et al.  Attitudes of semi-literate and literate bank account holders to the use of automatic teller machines (ATMs) , 2005 .

[16]  Ritu Agarwal Individual Acceptance of Information Technologies , 2000 .

[17]  Henrik Wimelius,et al.  Fundamentals of User Perception and Interaction: Environmental Psychology applied in a study of web pages , 2004, PsychNology J..

[18]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  Raymond S. Nickerson,et al.  Why Interactive Computer Systems are Sometimes Not Used by People Who Might Benefit from Them , 1999, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[20]  Clayton Lewis,et al.  Designing for usability—key principles and what designers think , 1983, CHI '83.

[21]  C. Carver Approach, Avoidance, and the Self-Regulation of Affect and Action , 2006 .

[22]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[23]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[24]  Michael F. Cowlishaw The design of the REXX language , 1987, SIGP.

[25]  Al-Sakib Khan Pathan,et al.  On the Key Factors of Usability in Small-sized Mobile Touch-Screen Application , 2013 .

[26]  Anirudha Joshi,et al.  Embedding HCI in Developing Countries: Localizing Content, Institutionalizing Education and Practice , 2007, INTERACT.

[27]  H Sackman,et al.  Delphi Assessment: Expert Opinion, Forecasting, and Group Process , 1974 .

[28]  Earl L. Wiener,et al.  Human factors of advanced technology (glass cockpit) transport aircraft , 1989 .

[29]  Murray E. Jennex,et al.  From Acceptance to Outcome: towards an Integrative Framework for Information Technology Adoption , 2014, ECIS.

[30]  Marilyn Hammer,et al.  Stress, coping, and adaptation , 2012 .

[31]  Ronald C. Arkin,et al.  Applying Heuristic Evaluation to Human-Robot Interaction Systems , 2007, FLAIRS.

[32]  Hui Deng,et al.  A Survey on Human Computer Interaction Technology for ATM , 2013 .

[33]  Kevin Curran,et al.  Investigating the Human Computer Interaction Problems with Automated Teller Machine (ATM) Navigation Menus , 2008, Comput. Inf. Sci..

[34]  S. Hauser,et al.  Stress, coping, and adaptation. , 1990 .

[35]  Lei Chi,et al.  Understanding Postadoptive Behaviors in Information Systems Use: A Longitudinal Analysis of System Use Problems in the Business Intelligence Context , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[37]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[38]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Integrated software usage in the professional work environment: evidence from questionnaires and interviews , 1986, CHI '86.

[39]  Marzieh Ahmadzadeh,et al.  Personalized ATMs: Improve ATMs Usability , 2011, HCI.

[40]  Rosa Yáñez Gómez,et al.  Heuristic Evaluation on Mobile Interfaces: A New Checklist , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[41]  Keith Case,et al.  Virtual fitting trials in 'design for all' , 2000 .

[42]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[43]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces , 1990, CHI '90.