Value of communication in agencies

Abstract Focusing on an agency model in which the agent receives private information prior to contracting, we analyze whether the principal benefits from offering the agent a menu of contracts. We show that, under certain conditions, the constraints imposed by the self-selection requirement are so restrictive that a menu of contracts has no value, i.e., the principal might as well offer a single contract based only on some jointly observed outcome. Conversely, we identify cases where a menu of contracts is valuable because it allows the principal to implement a more efficient incentive structure.

[1]  L. J. Savage Elicitation of Personal Probabilities and Expectations , 1971 .

[2]  David P. Baron,et al.  Monitoring of Performance in Organizational Contracting: The Case of Defense Procurement , 1988 .

[3]  Witold Pogorzelski,et al.  Integral equations and their applications , 1966 .

[4]  M. Weitzman The new Soviet incentive model , 1976 .

[5]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Good News and Bad News: Representation Theorems and Applications , 1981 .

[6]  J. Laffont,et al.  Using Cost Observation to Regulate Firms , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  Richard P. McLean,et al.  Optimal Selling Strategies under Uncertainty for a Discriminating Monopolist When Demands Are Interdependent , 1985 .

[8]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  AGGREGATION AND LINEARITY IN THE PROVISION OF INTERTEMPORAL INCENTIVES , 1987 .

[9]  Sanford J. Grossman,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF THE PRINCIPAL-AGENT PROBLEM , 1983 .

[10]  David P. Baron,et al.  Monitoring, moral hazard, asymmetric information, and risk sharing in procurement contracting , 1987 .

[11]  R. Myerson,et al.  Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown Costs , 1982 .

[12]  Stefan Reichelstein,et al.  Centralization Versus Delegation and the Value of Communication , 1987 .

[13]  John Christensen,et al.  Communication in Agencies , 1981 .

[14]  Mark Penno Informational Issues In The Financial-Reporting Process , 1985 .

[15]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  Moral Hazard and Observability , 1979 .

[16]  Patrick Billingsley,et al.  Probability and Measure. , 1986 .

[17]  C. Arrington,et al.  An Attribution Analysis Of Responsibility Assessment For Audit Performance , 1985 .

[18]  Mark Penno,et al.  Asymmetry Of Pre-Decision Information And Managerial Accounting , 1984 .

[19]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  Managerial Incentives, Investment and Aggregate Implications: Scale Effects , 1985 .

[20]  W. Rogerson On the Optimality of Menus of Linear Contracts , 1987 .

[21]  Jean Tirole,et al.  Auctioning Incentive Contracts , 1987, Journal of Political Economy.

[22]  Stefan Reichelstein,et al.  Information-eliciting compensation schemes , 1985 .

[23]  R. Preston McAfee,et al.  Competition for Agency Contracts , 1987 .

[24]  David E. M. Sappington,et al.  Incentive contracting with asymmetric and imperfect precontractual knowledge , 1984 .

[25]  Nahum D. Melumad Asymmetric information and the termination of contracts in agencies , 1989 .

[26]  Stefan Reichelstein,et al.  Incentives in Government Contracts , 1984 .

[27]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  The Theory of Contracts , 1986 .

[28]  P. Picard,et al.  On the design of incentive schemes under moral hazard and adverse selection , 1987 .

[29]  A. Friedman Foundations of modern analysis , 1970 .

[30]  William Thomson,et al.  Eliciting production possibilities from a well-informed manager , 1979 .

[31]  J. Mirrlees An Exploration in the Theory of Optimum Income Taxation an Exploration in the Theory of Optimum Income Taxation L Y 2 , 2022 .