The need to quantify authors' relative intellectual contributions in a multi-author paper
暂无分享,去创建一个
Nazmul Haque | Noor Lide Abu Kassim | Mohammad Tariqur Rahman | Joe Mac Regenstein | J. Regenstein | Md Nazmul Haque | N. Kassim
[1] N. Assimakis,et al. A new author’s productivity index: p-index , 2010, Scientometrics.
[2] Elizabeth Wager,et al. How to handle authorship disputes: a guide for new researchers , 2009, Science Editor and Publisher.
[3] Liaojun Pang,et al. Determining scientific impact using a collaboration index , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[4] William F. Laurance,et al. Second thoughts on who goes where in author lists , 2006, Nature.
[5] Marek Kosmulski,et al. The order in the lists of authors in multi-author papers revisited , 2012, J. Informetrics.
[6] Peder Olesen Larsen,et al. Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies , 2005, Scientometrics.
[7] Ludo Waltman,et al. Field-Normalized Citation Impact Indicators and the Choice of an Appropriate Counting Method , 2015, ISSI.
[8] Nils T. Hagen,et al. Harmonic coauthor credit: A parsimonious quantification of the byline hierarchy , 2013, J. Informetrics.
[9] Ludo Waltman,et al. A review of the literature on citation impact indicators , 2015, J. Informetrics.
[10] Ludo Waltman,et al. An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing , 2012, J. Informetrics.
[11] Nils T. Hagen,et al. Harmonic Allocation of Authorship Credit: Source-Level Correction of Bibliometric Bias Assures Accurate Publication and Citation Analysis , 2008, PloS one.
[12] Nils T. Hagen,et al. Contributory inequality alters assessment of academic output gap between comparable countries , 2015, J. Informetrics.
[13] Ash Mohammad Abbas,et al. Weighted indices for evaluating the quality of research with multiple authorship , 2010, Scientometrics.
[14] Nils T. Hagen,et al. Counting and comparing publication output with and without equalizing and inflationary bias , 2014, J. Informetrics.
[15] Donald Kennedy,et al. Multiple Authors, Multiple Problems , 2003, Science.
[16] Tang Xiaoli,et al. Perceptions of author order versus contribution among researchers with different professional ranks and the potential of harmonic counts for encouraging ethical co-authorship practices , 2013, Scientometrics.
[17] Richard S. J. Tol,et al. Credit where credit’s due: accounting for co-authorship in citation counts , 2011, Scientometrics.
[18] Peder Olesen Larsen,et al. Publication, cooperation and productivity measures in scientific research , 2007, Scientometrics.
[19] J. E. Hirsch,et al. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.
[20] Wolfgang Glänzel,et al. Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies , 2004, Scientometrics.
[21] Thomas R. Scott,et al. QUAD system offers fair shares to all authors , 2003, Nature.
[22] F. Davidoff. News from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[23] M. Rozing,et al. Profit (p)-Index: The Degree to Which Authors Profit from Co-Authors , 2013, PloS one.
[24] M. Hochberg,et al. Author Sequence and Credit for Contributions in Multiauthored Publications , 2007, PLoS biology.
[25] Benjamin F. Jones,et al. Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .
[26] Y. Liu,et al. Credit Where Credit Is Due , 2001 .
[27] Vincent Larivière,et al. Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900 , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[28] Ken Hyland,et al. Self-citation and Self-reference: Credibility and Promotion in Academic Publication , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[29] Dag W. Aksnes,et al. Ranking national research systems by citation indicators. A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalised counting methods , 2012, J. Informetrics.
[30] Marjorie M. K. Hlava,et al. Publishing: Credit where credit is due , 2014, Nature.
[31] Roderick Hunt,et al. Trying an authorship index , 1991, Nature.
[32] Albert-László Barabási,et al. Collective credit allocation in science , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[33] Roger Watson Editor-in-Chief. Who writes, whose rights, and who's right? Issues in authorship , 2013 .
[34] Nils T. Hagen,et al. Harmonic publication and citation counting: sharing authorship credit equitably – not equally, geometrically or arithmetically , 2009, Scientometrics.
[35] Leo Egghe,et al. Mathematical theory of the h- and g-index in case of fractional counting of authorship , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[36] A. Regalado,et al. Multiauthor papers on the rise. , 1995, Science.
[37] Nils T. Hagen,et al. Reversing the byline hierarchy: The effect of equalizing bias on the accreditation of primary, secondary and senior authors , 2014, J. Informetrics.
[38] Shaon Sahoo. Analyzing research performance: proposition of a new complementary index , 2016, Scientometrics.
[39] Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al. Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[40] Giovanni Abramo,et al. The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences , 2018, J. Informetrics.
[41] Ç. Şekercioğlu. Quantifying Coauthor Contributions , 2008, Science.
[42] Tove Faber Frandsen,et al. What is in a name? Credit assignment practices in different disciplines , 2010, J. Informetrics.
[43] Guido Van Hooydonk,et al. Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: consequences for evaluation studies , 2000 .
[44] Dag W. Aksnes,et al. Does self-citation pay? , 2007, Scientometrics.
[45] D. Rennie,et al. The contributions of authors. , 2000, JAMA.
[46] Mu-Hsuan Huang,et al. Counting methods, country rank changes, and counting inflation in the assessment of national research productivity and impact , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..