Evolutionary Theorizing on Economic Growth

The research project on Systems Analysis of Technological and Economic Dynamics at IIASA is concerned with modeling technological and organisational change; the broader economic developments that are associated with technological change, both as cause and effect; the processes by which economic agents -- first of all, business firms -- acquire and develop the capabilities to generate, imitate and adopt technological and organisational innovations; and the aggregate dynamics -- at the levels of single industries and whole economies -- engendered by the interactions among agents which are heterogeneous in their innovative abilities, behavioural rules and expectations. The central purpose is to develop stronger theory and better modeling techniques. However, the basic philosophy is that such theoretical and modeling work is most fruitful when attention is paid to the known empirical details of the phenomena the work aims to address: therefore, a considerable effort is put into a better understanding of the "stylized facts" concerning corporate organisation routines and strategy; industrial evolution and the "demography" of firms; patterns of macroeconomic growth and trade. From a modeling perspective, over the last decade considerable progress has been made on various techniques of dynamic modeling. Some of this work has employed ordinary differential and difference equations, and some of it stochastic equations. A number of efforts have taken advantage of the growing power of simulation techniques. Others have employed more traditional mathematics. As a result of this theoretical work, the toolkit for modeling technological and economic dynamics is significantly richer than it was a decade ago. During the same period, there have been major advances in the empirical understanding. There are now many more detailed technological histories available. Much more is known about the similarities and differences of technical advance in different fields and industries and there is some understanding of the key variables that lie behind those differences. A number of studies have provided rich information about how industry structure co-evolves with technology. In addition to empirical work at the technology or sector level, the last decade has also seen a great deal of empirical research on productivity growth and measured technical advance at the level of whole economies. A considerable body of empirical research now exists on the facts that seem associated with different rates of productivity growth across the range of nations, with the dynamics of convergence and divergence in the levels and rates of growth of income, with the diverse national institutional arrangements in which technological change is embedded. As a result of this recent empirical work, the questions that successful theory and useful modeling techniques ought to address now are much more clearly defined. The theoretical work has often been undertaken in appreciation of certain stylized facts that needed to be explained. The list of these "facts" is indeed very long, ranging from the microeconomic evidence concerning for example dynamic increasing returns in learning activities or the persistence of particular sets of problem-solving routines within business firms; the industry-level evidence on entry, exit and size-distributions -- approximately log-normal -- all the way to the evidence regarding the time-series properties of major economic aggregates. However, the connection between the theoretical work and the empirical phenomena has so far not been very close. The philosophy of this project is that the chances of developing powerful new theory and useful new analytical techniques can be greatly enhanced by performing the work in an environment where scholars who understand the empirical phenomena provide questions and challenges for the theorists and their work. In particular, the project is meant to pursue an "evolutionary" interpretation of technological and economic dynamics modeling, first, the processes by which individual agents and organisations learn, search, adapt; second, the economic analogues of "natural selection" by which interactive environments -- often markets - winnow out a population whose members have different attributes and behavioural traits; and, third, the collective emergence of statistical patterns, regularities and higher-level structures as the aggregate outcomes of the two former processes. Together with a group of researchers located permanently at IIASA, the project coordinates multiple research efforts undertaken in several institutions around the world, organises workshops and provides a venue of scientific discussion among scholars working on evolutionary modeling, computer simulation and non-linear dynamical systems. The research focuses upon the following three major areas: (1) Learning Processes and Organisational Competence; (2) Technological and Industrial Dynamic; (3) Innovation, Competition and Macrodynamics.

[1]  R. Rob,et al.  Learning, Mutation, and Long Run Equilibria in Games , 1993 .

[2]  A. Shaikh,et al.  Growth, profits, and property: Laws of production and laws of algebra: Humbug II , 1980 .

[3]  John Conlisk,et al.  An Aggregate Model of Technical Change , 1989 .

[4]  John Horgan,et al.  From Complexity to Perplexity , 1995 .

[5]  Werner Ebeling,et al.  A stochastic model of technological evolution , 1992 .

[6]  Gunnar Eliasson,et al.  Modeling the experimentally organized economy: Complex dynamics in an empirical micro-macro model of endogenous economic growth , 1991 .

[7]  H. Peyton Young,et al.  Stochastic Evolutionary Game Dynamics , 1990 .

[8]  James A. Mirrlees,et al.  A New Model of Economic Growth , 1962 .

[9]  Robert M. Solow,et al.  Law of Production and Laws of Algebra: The Humbug Production Function: A Comment , 1974 .

[10]  P. Romer Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[11]  E W Montroll,et al.  Social dynamics and the quantifying of social forces. , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  A. J. Lotka Elements of mathematical biology , 1956 .

[13]  Katsuhito Iwai,et al.  Schumpeterian dynamics, Part II: Technological progress, firm growth and `economic selection' , 1984 .

[14]  Victor Polterovich,et al.  Schumpeterian dynamics as a non-linear wave theory , 1991 .

[15]  A. Marshall,et al.  Principles of Economics , 1890 .

[16]  W. Baumol Productivity Growth, Convergence, and Welfare: What the Long-run Data Show , 1985 .

[17]  Francesca Chiaromonte,et al.  Heterogeneity, competition, and macroeconomic dynamics , 1993 .

[18]  J. Schumpeter Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[19]  Geoffrey M. Hodgson,et al.  Economics and Evolution: Bringing Life Back into Economics. , 1995 .

[20]  G. Edelman Neural Darwinism: The Theory Of Neuronal Group Selection , 1989 .

[21]  R. Goodwin A Growth Cycle , 1982 .

[22]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[23]  E. H. Phelps Brown,et al.  The Meaning of the Fitted Cobb-Douglas Function , 1957 .

[24]  Josef Steindl Maturity and stagnation in American capitalism , 1952 .

[25]  J. Holland,et al.  Artificial Adaptive Agents in Economic Theory , 1991 .

[26]  Sidney G. Winter,et al.  Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes , 1983 .

[27]  Hans-Paul Schwefel,et al.  Evolution and optimum seeking , 1995, Sixth-generation computer technology series.

[28]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  The theory of evolution and dynamical systems , 1988 .

[29]  T. Vasko,et al.  The Long-Wave Debate , 1987 .

[30]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  An evolutionary model of long term cyclical variations of catching up and falling behind , 1995 .

[31]  Katsuhito Iwai,et al.  Schumpeterian dynamics : An evolutionary model of innovation and imitation , 1984 .

[32]  R. Nelson Recent Evolutionary Theorizing about Economic Change , 2005, Technology, Institutions, and Economic Growth.

[33]  池田 勝彦,et al.  Evolutionary Economics の最近の発展 , 1993 .

[34]  J. Monod Le hasard et la nécessité , 1970 .

[35]  A. Shaikh,et al.  Humbug production function , 1990 .

[36]  Kenneth E. Boulding,et al.  Ecodynamics: A New Theory of Societal Evolution , 1978 .

[37]  H. Young,et al.  The Evolution of Conventions , 1993 .

[38]  Halina Kwasnicka,et al.  Market, innovation, competition: An evolutionary model of industrial dynamics , 1992 .

[39]  R. Solow TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE AGGREGATE PRODUCTION FUNCTION , 1957 .

[40]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Learning, innovation and economic growth: A long-run model of industrial dynamics. , 1994 .

[41]  K. Arrow The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[42]  K. Sigmund A Survey of Replicator Equations , 1986 .

[43]  Luigi Orsenigo,et al.  Innovation, Diversity and Diffusion: A Self-organisation Model , 1988 .

[44]  A. Maddison,et al.  Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development: A Long-Run Comparative View , 1991 .

[45]  M. King,et al.  INVESTMENT AND TECHNICAL PROGRESS , 1992 .

[46]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[47]  David A. Lane,et al.  Artificial worlds and economics, part I , 1993 .

[48]  De Long,et al.  Productivity Growth, Convergence, and Welfare: Comment , 1988 .

[49]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  A Note on the Cobb-Douglas Function , 1963 .

[50]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Uneven growth between interdependent economies : an evolutionary view on technology gaps, trade and growth , 1994 .

[51]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Convergence in the global economy. A broad historical viewpoint , 1995 .

[52]  E. Schrödinger What is life? : the physical aspect of the living cell , 1944 .

[53]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Agent-Based Modeling: Understanding Our Creations , 1994 .

[54]  Alfred Wagner,et al.  Marshall's Principles of Economics , 1891 .

[55]  A. Haddow,et al.  What is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell: By Erwin Schrödinger. Cambridge: University Press. 1944, viii + 91 pages , 1945 .

[56]  P. Cook,et al.  The Competitive Process. , 1959 .

[57]  Gavin J. Wright An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1982 .

[58]  W. E. G. Salter,et al.  Productivity and Technical Change. , 1961 .

[59]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy , 1996 .

[60]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Collective learning, innovation and growth in a boundedly rational, evolutionary world , 1994 .

[61]  A. Alchian Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory , 1950, Journal of Political Economy.

[62]  Henry Adams,et al.  The Degradation Of The Democratic Dogma , 1919 .

[63]  F. Weiling Lotka, A. J.: Elements of Mathematical Biology. Dover Publications Inc., New‐York 1956; XXX + 465 S., 72 Abb., 36 Tabellen und 4 Übersichtstabellen im Anhang, Preis $ 2,45 , 1965 .

[64]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Technological Substitution and Long Waves in the USA , 1987 .

[65]  D.E. Goldberg,et al.  Classifier Systems and Genetic Algorithms , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[66]  J. Mccombie,et al.  Does the aggregate production function imply anything about the laws of production? A note on the Simon and Shaikh critiques , 1987 .

[67]  H. Houthakker,et al.  The Pareto Distribution and the Cobb-Douglas Production Function in Activity Analysis , 1955 .

[68]  H. Simon,et al.  On Parsimonious Explanations of Production Relations , 1979 .

[69]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Technical Change in an Evolutionary Model , 1976 .

[70]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.

[71]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up , 1996 .

[72]  L W Buss,et al.  What would be conserved if "the tape were played twice"? , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[73]  Giovanni Dosi,et al.  The dynamics of international differentiation: A multi-country evolutionary model , 1994 .

[74]  Gunnar Eliasson,et al.  Competition and Market Processes in a Simulation Model of the Swedish Economy , 1977 .

[75]  Anwar M. Shaikh,et al.  Laws of Production and Laws of Algebra: The Humbug Production Function , 1974 .

[76]  Alfred J. Lotka,et al.  The law of evolution as a maximal principle , 1945 .

[77]  Gerald Silverberg,et al.  Long waves and 'evolutionary chaos' in a simple Schumpeterian model of embodied technical change , 1993 .

[78]  Werner Ebeling,et al.  Physik der Selbstorganisation und Evolution , 1984 .

[79]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  “The Dynamics of Energy Systems and the Logistic Substitution Model” (1979) , 1978, The Future of Nature.

[80]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .