Knowledge Transfers between Canadian Business Enterprises and Universities: Does Distance Matter?

This study examines whether the transfer of knowledge flows from universities to enterprises in Canada is hampered by the geographical distance that separates them. The transfer of knowledge flows are measured by the amount of R&D payments from business enterprises to universities that are directly reported in Statistics Canada's survey on Research and Development in Canadian Industry. We use data from the 1997 to 2001 surveys. After controlling for unobserved individual heterogeneity, selection bias as well as for other covariates that could affect the extent of industry-university R&D transactions such as absorptive capacity, foreign control, belonging to the same province, past experience with a given university and other firm and university characteristics, it is found that a 10% increase in distance decreases the proportion of total R&D paid to a university by 1.4 percent for enterprises that do not report any codified transfer of knowledge flow, and by half as much for enterprises that report codified knowledge flows.

[1]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Real Effects of Academic Research: Comment , 1992 .

[2]  C. Karlsson,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers in a Spatial Context — A Critical Review and Assessment , 2001 .

[3]  C. Autant-Bernard The Geography Of Knowledge Spillovers And Technological Proximity , 2001 .

[4]  C. Carrincazeaux,et al.  Proximity and localisation of corporate R&D activities , 2001 .

[5]  Stefano Breschi,et al.  Mobility of inventors and the geography of knowledge spillovers. New evidence on US data , 2006 .

[6]  M. Carree,et al.  Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies , 2004 .

[7]  Richard Florida,et al.  Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States , 1999 .

[8]  Y. Lee,et al.  University‐Industry Collaboration on Technology Transfer: Views from the Ivory Tower , 1998 .

[9]  L. Zucker,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Firm: The Technology of Geographically Localized Knowledge Spillovers , 1994 .

[10]  P. Mohnen,et al.  Buying and Selling Research and Development Services, 1997 to 2002 , 2006 .

[11]  H. Commandeur,et al.  The Effects of Self-Reinforcing Mechanisms on Firm Performance , 2002 .

[12]  R. Veugelers,et al.  R&D Cooperation between Firms and Universities: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgian Manufacturing , 2003 .

[13]  Corinne Autant-Bernard The Geography Of Knowledge Spillovers And Technological Proximity , 2001 .

[14]  Martin Andersson,et al.  Company R&D and University R&D - How Are They Related? , 2005 .

[15]  W. Greene,et al.  计量经济分析 = Econometric analysis , 2009 .

[16]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms , 2004 .

[17]  C. Karlsson,et al.  Industry R & D and University R & D – How Are They Related ? , 2005 .

[18]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[19]  L. Dooley,et al.  University‐industry collaboration , 2007 .

[20]  A. Jaffe Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[21]  Attila Varga,et al.  Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations , 1997 .

[22]  P. Thompson,et al.  Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: A Reassessment , 2005 .

[23]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology , 1996 .

[24]  Manfred M. Fischer,et al.  The Geography of Knowledge Spillovers between High-Technology Firms in Europe - Evidence from a Spatial Interaction Modelling Perspective , 2006 .

[25]  A. Geuna,et al.  Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling , 2006 .

[26]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[27]  E. Mansfield,et al.  The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support , 1996 .

[28]  M. Feldman,et al.  University Technology Transfer and the System of Innovation , 2002 .

[29]  Maryann P. Feldman The geography of innovation , 1994 .

[30]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[31]  L. Bottazzi,et al.  Innovation and Spillovers in Regions: Evidence from European Patent Data , 2002 .

[32]  Erik E. Lehmann,et al.  University spillovers and new firm location , 2005 .

[33]  Pierre Mohnen,et al.  Série Scientifique Scientific Series What Type of Enterprise Forges Close Links with Universities and Government Labs? Evidence from Cis 2 What Type of Enterprise Forges Close Links with Universities and Government Labs? Evidence from Cis 2 , 2022 .

[34]  Marc Frenette,et al.  Too Far to Go On? Distance to School and University Participation , 2006 .

[35]  M. Ozman,et al.  Networks and Innovation : A Survey of Empirical Literature , 2006 .

[36]  Myriam Mariani,et al.  Next to Production or to Technological Clusters? The Economics and Management of R&D Location , 1999 .