Predicting the Quality of Meat: Myth or Reality?

This review is aimed at providing an overview of recent advances made in the field of meat quality prediction, particularly in Europe. The different methods used in research labs or by the production sectors for the development of equations and tools based on different types of biological (genomic or phenotypic) or physical (spectroscopy) markers are discussed. Through the various examples, it appears that although biological markers have been identified, quality parameters go through a complex determinism process. This makes the development of generic molecular tests even more difficult. However, in recent years, progress in the development of predictive tools has benefited from technological breakthroughs in genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics. Concerning spectroscopy, the most significant progress was achieved using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) to predict the composition and nutritional value of meats. However, predicting the functional properties of meats using this method—mainly, the sensorial quality—is more difficult. Finally, the example of the MSA (Meat Standards Australia) phenotypic model, which predicts the eating quality of beef based on a combination of upstream and downstream data, is described. Its benefit for the beef industry has been extensively demonstrated in Australia, and its generic performance has already been proven in several countries.

[1]  Gerard Downey,et al.  Prediction of Tenderness and other Quality Attributes of Beef by near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy between 750 and 1100 nm; Further Studies , 2001 .

[2]  C. Berri,et al.  Impact of divergent selection for ultimate pH of pectoralis major muscle on biochemical, histological, and sensorial attributes of broiler meat. , 2015, Journal of animal science.

[3]  B. Picard,et al.  Understanding Early Post-Mortem Biochemical Processes Underlying Meat Color and pH Decline in the Longissimus thoracis Muscle of Young Blond d'Aquitaine Bulls Using Protein Biomarkers. , 2015, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[4]  Daniel Cozzolino,et al.  Visible and near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy for the Determination of Moisture, Fat and Protein in Chicken Breast and Thigh Muscle , 1996 .

[5]  M De Marchi,et al.  The relevance of different near infrared technologies and sample treatments for predicting meat quality traits in commercial beef cuts. , 2013, Meat science.

[6]  B. Picard,et al.  Inverse relationships between biomarkers and beef tenderness according to contractile and metabolic properties of the muscle. , 2014, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[7]  P. Ecolan,et al.  Influence of production system in local and conventional pig breeds on stress indicators at slaughter, muscle and meat traits and pork eating quality. , 2015, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[8]  Marjana Novič,et al.  An attempt to predict pork drip loss from pH and colour measurements or near infrared spectra using artificial neural networks. , 2009, Meat science.

[9]  P. Allen,et al.  Evaluation of beef eating quality by Irish consumers. , 2017, Meat science.

[10]  Isabelle Guisle,et al.  Differentially-expressed genes in pig Longissimus muscles with contrasting levels of fat, as identified by combined transcriptomic, reverse transcription PCR, and proteomic analyses. , 2009, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[11]  Martin Škrlep,et al.  Accuracy of near infrared spectroscopy for prediction of chemical composition, salt content and free amino acids in dry-cured ham. , 2011, Meat science.

[12]  C. Berri,et al.  Serum and Muscle Metabolomics for the Prediction of Ultimate pH, a Key Factor for Chicken-Meat Quality. , 2016, Journal of proteome research.

[13]  Yongliang Liu,et al.  Prediction of color, texture, and sensory characteristics of beef steaks by visible and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. A feasibility study. , 2003, Meat science.

[14]  J. Kerry,et al.  Consumer perception and the role of science in the meat industry. , 2010, Meat science.

[15]  B. Lebret,et al.  La viande et les produits du porc : comment satisfaire des attentes qualitatives variées ? , 2015 .

[16]  C. Berri,et al.  Chicken meat quality: genetic variability and relationship with growth and muscle characteristics , 2008, BMC Genetics.

[17]  B. Picard,et al.  Validation of a Dot-Blot quantitative technique for large scale analysis of beef tenderness biomarkers. , 2009, Journal of physiology and pharmacology : an official journal of the Polish Physiological Society.

[18]  D W Pethick,et al.  Prediction of beef eating quality in France using the Meat Standards Australia system. , 2013, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[19]  B. Picard,et al.  Associations among Protein Biomarkers and pH and Color Traits in Longissimus thoracis and Rectus abdominis Muscles in Protected Designation of Origin Maine-Anjou Cull Cows. , 2017, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[20]  L. Farmer,et al.  Preliminary investigation of the application of Raman spectroscopy to the prediction of the sensory quality of beef silverside. , 2004, Meat science.

[21]  A. Garrido-Varo,et al.  Prediction of fatty acids content in pig adipose tissue by near infrared spectroscopy: at-line versus in-situ analysis. , 2013, Meat science.

[22]  A. Watanabe,et al.  Metabolomic approach to key metabolites characterizing postmortem aged loin muscle of Japanese Black (Wagyu) cattle , 2019, Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences.

[23]  I. González-Martín,et al.  On-line determination of fatty acid composition in intramuscular fat of Iberian pork loin by NIRs with a remote reflectance fibre optic probe. , 2005, Meat science.

[24]  L. Istasse,et al.  Prediction of technological and organoleptic properties of beef Longissimus thoracis from near-infrared reflectance and transmission spectra. , 2004, Meat science.

[25]  Munir Ahmad,et al.  Identification of the adoption level of water saving interventions and reasons for non adoption in Faisalabad district. , 2015 .

[26]  J. Merks,et al.  Perspective of NIRS measurements early post mortem for prediction of pork quality. , 2005, Meat science.

[27]  B. Picard,et al.  Proteomic analysis of bovine skeletal muscle hypertrophy , 2005, Proteomics.

[28]  B. Lebret,et al.  Comment la structure et la composition du muscle déterminent la qualité des viandes ou chairs ? , 2015, INRA Productions Animales.

[29]  L. Farmer,et al.  Review: Beef-eating quality: a European journey. , 2018, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[30]  A Ripoche,et al.  Determination of fatty acid composition of pork fat by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. , 2001, Meat science.

[31]  B. Picard,et al.  Muscle proteome and meat eating qualities of Longissimus thoracis of "Blonde d'Aquitaine" young bulls: A central role of HSP27 isoforms. , 2008, Meat science.

[32]  S. Prasher,et al.  Prediction of drip-loss, pH, and color for pork using a hyperspectral imaging technique. , 2007, Meat science.

[33]  K. Hollung,et al.  Peroxiredoxin-6--a potential protein marker for meat tenderness in bovine longissimus thoracis muscle. , 2009, Journal of animal science.

[34]  J. Hocquette,et al.  Phenotyping of Animals and Their Meat: Applications of Low-Power Ultrasounds, Near-Infrared Spectroscopy, Raman Spectroscopy, and Hyperspectral Imaging , 2017 .

[35]  B. Picard,et al.  Biological Markers for Meat Tenderness of the Three Main French Beef Breeds Using 2-DE and MS Approach , 2013 .

[36]  W. R. Windham,et al.  Principal component analysis of physical, color, and sensory characteristics of chicken breasts deboned at two, four, six, and twenty-four hours postmortem. , 2004, Poultry science.

[37]  B. Lebret,et al.  Les principales composantes de la qualité des carcasses et des viandes dans les différentes espèces animales , 2015, INRA Productions Animales.

[38]  C. Berri,et al.  Identification of genomic regions and candidate genes for chicken meat ultimate pH by combined detection of selection signatures and QTL , 2018, BMC Genomics.

[39]  C. Berri,et al.  Identification of differentially expressed genes in chickens differing in muscle glycogen content and meat quality , 2011, BMC Genomics.

[40]  T. Sayd,et al.  Comparison of sarcoplasmic proteomes between two groups of pig muscles selected for shear force of cooked meat. , 2007, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[41]  G. Bittante,et al.  Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy predictions as indicator traits in breeding programs for enhanced beef quality. , 2011, Journal of animal science.

[42]  M. Damon,et al.  Associations between muscle gene expression pattern and technological and sensory meat traits highlight new biomarkers for pork quality assessment. , 2013, Meat science.

[43]  J. Hocquette,et al.  Biochemical measurements of beef are a good predictor of untrained consumer sensory scores across muscles. , 2015, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[44]  P. Allen,et al.  Ossification score is a better indicator of maturity related changes in eating quality than animal age. , 2016, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[45]  A correlative study on data from pork carcass and processed meat (Bauernspeck) for automatic estimation of chemical parameters by means of near-infrared spectroscopy. , 2013, Meat science.

[46]  C. Berri,et al.  Nutrigenetics of carotenoid metabolism in the chicken: a polymorphism at the β,β-carotene 15,15'-mono-oxygenase 1 (BCMO1) locus affects the response to dietary β-carotene , 2014, British Journal of Nutrition.

[47]  L. Liaubet,et al.  Recent advances in omic technologies for meat quality management. , 2015, Meat science.

[48]  M. Bonnet,et al.  Functional analysis of beef tenderness. , 2011, Journal of proteomics.

[49]  B. Picard,et al.  Proteomic Investigations of Beef Tenderness , 2017 .

[50]  J B Morgan,et al.  Predicting beef tenderness using near-infrared spectroscopy. , 2008, Journal of animal science.

[51]  G. Hemke,et al.  Prediction of pork quality using visible/near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. , 2006, Meat science.

[52]  J C Forrest,et al.  Development of technology for the early post mortem prediction of water holding capacity and drip loss in fresh pork. , 2000, Meat science.

[53]  K. Grunert,et al.  European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork. , 2010, Meat science.

[54]  C. Berri,et al.  A mutation in the promoter of the chicken β,β-carotene 15,15'-monooxygenase 1 gene alters xanthophyll metabolism through a selective effect on its mRNA abundance in the breast muscle. , 2012, Journal of animal science.

[55]  M. Chmiel,et al.  The use of computer vision system to detect pork defects , 2016 .

[56]  S. Lagarrigue,et al.  Detection of a Cis eQTL Controlling BMCO1 Gene Expression Leads to the Identification of a QTG for Chicken Breast Meat Color , 2011, PloS one.

[57]  A. Vincent,et al.  Molecular biomarkers to discriminate pork quality classes based on sensory and technological attributes , 2015 .

[58]  Fang Cheng,et al.  On-line prediction of fresh pork quality using visible/near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. , 2010, Meat science.

[59]  J. Hocquette,et al.  Update of Meat Standards Australia and the cuts based grading scheme for beef and sheepmeat , 2018, Journal of Integrative Agriculture.

[60]  P. Allen,et al.  European conformation and fat scores have no relationship with eating quality. , 2016, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[61]  S. S. Lee,et al.  Investigation of blood biomarkers related to meat quality and quantity in Hanwoo steers , 2018, Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences.

[62]  G. Ripoll,et al.  Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy for predicting chemical, instrumental and sensory quality of beef. , 2008, Meat science.

[63]  P Berzaghi,et al.  Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy as a method to predict chemical composition of breast meat and discriminate between different n-3 feeding sources. , 2005, Poultry science.

[64]  J E Guerrero-Ginel,et al.  A feasibility study on the use of near-infrared spectroscopy for prediction of the fatty acid profile in live Iberian pigs and carcasses. , 2009, Meat science.

[65]  S. Lagarrigue,et al.  Muscle transcriptome analysis reveals molecular pathways and biomarkers involved in extreme ultimate pH and meat defect occurrence in chicken , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[66]  M. Čandek-Potokar,et al.  Ability of near Infrared Spectroscopy to Predict Pork Technological Traits , 2006 .

[67]  R. Watson,et al.  Development of the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) prediction model for beef palatability , 2008 .

[68]  H. J. Andersen,et al.  Early prediction of water-holding capacity in meat by multivariate vibrational spectroscopy. , 2003, Meat science.

[69]  J. Hocquette,et al.  Perception in France of the Australian system for the prediction of beef quality (Meat Standards Australia) with perspectives for the European beef sector , 2011 .

[70]  I. Murray,et al.  The use of visible and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy to predict beef M. longissimus thoracis et lumborum quality attributes. , 2008, Meat science.

[71]  A. Vautier,et al.  Meat quality mapping of the loin: pH vs NIR spectroscopy to predict the cooking yield. , 2014 .

[72]  B. Picard,et al.  Mapping of bovine skeletal muscle proteins using two‐dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry , 2004, Proteomics.

[73]  Y. Shirai,et al.  Comparative metabolomics of Japanese Black cattle beef and other meats using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry , 2019, Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry.

[74]  Heinar Schmidt,et al.  Raman spectroscopy compared against traditional predictors of shear force in lamb m. longissimus lumborum. , 2014, Meat science.

[75]  V. Santé-Lhoutellier,et al.  Application to proteomics to understand and modify meat quality. , 2014, Meat science.

[76]  C. Berri,et al.  Adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase involved in variations of muscle glycogen and breast meat quality between lean and fat chickens. , 2008, Journal of animal science.

[77]  Yibin Ying,et al.  Applications of Raman Spectroscopy in Agricultural Products and Food Analysis: A Review , 2011 .

[78]  Shiv O. Prasher,et al.  Categorization of pork quality using Gabor filter-based hyperspectral imaging technology , 2010 .

[79]  S B Engelsen,et al.  Prediction of water-holding capacity and composition of porcine meat by comparative spectroscopy. , 2000, Meat science.

[80]  A. Ouali,et al.  Biomarkers of meat tenderness: present knowledge and perspectives in regards to our current understanding of the mechanisms involved. , 2013, Meat science.

[81]  R. Klont,et al.  Prediction of pork quality with near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS): 1. Feasibility and robustness of NIRS measurements at laboratory scale. , 2012, Meat science.

[82]  W. R. Windham,et al.  Prediction of physical, color, and sensory characteristics of broiler breasts by visible/near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. , 2004, Poultry science.

[83]  M De Marchi,et al.  Feasibility of the direct application of near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy on intact chicken breasts to predict meat color and physical traits. , 2011, Poultry science.

[84]  J. Hocquette,et al.  The GENOTEND chip: a new tool to analyse gene expression in muscles of beef cattle for beef quality prediction , 2012, BMC Veterinary Research.

[85]  Ana Cristina Figueira,et al.  Predicting pork quality using Vis/NIR spectroscopy. , 2015, Meat science.

[86]  Giving meat meaning: Creating value-based connections with consumers , 2018, Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture.

[87]  M De Marchi,et al.  At-line prediction of fatty acid profile in chicken breast using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. , 2012, Meat science.

[88]  Heinar Schmidt,et al.  Assessment of tenderness of aged bovine gluteus medius muscles using Raman spectroscopy. , 2016, Meat science.

[89]  Luis Guerrero,et al.  Consumer preference, behavior and perception about meat and meat products: an overview. , 2014, Meat science.

[90]  C. Berri,et al.  Selecting broiler chickens for ultimate pH of breast muscle: analysis of divergent selection experiment and phenotypic consequences on meat quality, growth, and body composition traits. , 2014, Journal of animal science.

[91]  N. Prieto,et al.  Ability of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) to estimate physical parameters of adult steers (oxen) and young cattle meat samples. , 2008, Meat science.

[92]  M. Bonnet,et al.  Integrated data mining of transcriptomic and proteomic datasets to predict the secretome of adipose tissue and muscle in ruminants. , 2016, Molecular bioSystems.

[93]  R. Hamill,et al.  Functional analysis of muscle gene expression profiles associated with tenderness and intramuscular fat content in pork. , 2012, Meat science.

[94]  F. Abeni,et al.  Characterization of different strains of broiler chicken by carcass measurements, chemical and physical parameters and NIRS on breast muscle. , 2001, Meat science.

[95]  P. Allen,et al.  Review: The variability of the eating quality of beef can be reduced by predicting consumer satisfaction. , 2018, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[96]  Wim Verbeke,et al.  Modelling of beef sensory quality for a better prediction of palatability. , 2014, Meat science.

[97]  Nigel D. Scollan,et al.  Future research priorities for animal production in a changing world , 2011 .

[98]  K. Gutkowska,et al.  Influence of cut and thermal treatment on consumer perception of beef in Polish trials. , 2015 .

[99]  Xiaojing Tian,et al.  Targeted metabolomics to reveal muscle-specific energy metabolism between bovine longissimus lumborum and psoas major during early postmortem periods. , 2019, Meat science.

[100]  R. Roehe,et al.  Application of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy to predict meat and meat products quality: A review. , 2009, Meat science.

[101]  R. Watson,et al.  Japanese consumer categorisation of beef into quality grades, based on Meat Standards Australia methodology. , 2011, Animal science journal = Nihon chikusan Gakkaiho.

[102]  E. Baéza,et al.  Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy for predicting lipid content in duck breast meat , 2009 .

[103]  J. Thompson,et al.  Meat standards and grading: a world view. , 2010, Meat science.

[104]  R. Polkinghorne,et al.  Consumer assessment of eating quality – development of protocols for Meat Standards Australia (MSA) testing , 2008 .

[105]  M. Sancristobal,et al.  A muscle transcriptome analysis identifies positional candidate genes for a complex trait in pig. , 2008, Animal genetics.

[106]  M. Bonnet,et al.  Reverse Phase Protein array for the quantification and validation of protein biomarkers of beef qualities: The case of meat color from Charolais breed. , 2018, Meat science.