When Good Comms Go Bad: Communications Recovery For Multi-Robot Teams

Abstract : Ad-hoc networks among groups of autonomous mobile robots are becoming a common occurrence as teams of robots take on increasingly complicated missions over wider areas. Research has often focused on proactive means in which the individual robots of the team may prevent communication failures between nodes in this network. This is not always possible especially in unknown or hostile environments. This research addresses reactive aspects of communication recovery. How should the members of the team react in the event of unseen communication failures between some or all of the nodes in the network? We present a number of behaviors to be utilized in the event of communications failure as well as a behavioral sequencer to further enhance the effectiveness of these recovery behaviors. The performance of the communication recovery behaviors is analyzed in simulation and their application on hardware platforms is discussed.

[1]  Ronald C. Arkin,et al.  Motor Schema — Based Mobile Robot Navigation , 1989, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[2]  Roderic A. Grupen,et al.  Coordinated teams of reactive mobile platforms , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[3]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[4]  Ronald C. Arkin,et al.  Internalized plans for communication-sensitive robot team behaviors , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[5]  Hoa G. Nguyen,et al.  Autonomous Communication Relays for Tactical Robots , 2003 .

[6]  Ronald C. Arkin,et al.  Line-of-sight constrained exploration for reactive multiagent robotic teams , 2002, 7th International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control. Proceedings (Cat. No.02TH8623).

[7]  Arvin Agah,et al.  In a team of robots the loudest is not necessarily the best , 1995, 1995 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Intelligent Systems for the 21st Century.

[8]  Stephen Cameron,et al.  Robot control of animal flocks , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control (ISIC) held jointly with IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation (CIRA) Intell.

[9]  Huosheng Hu,et al.  Coordination of multiple mobile robots via communication , 1999, Other Conferences.

[10]  Reid G. Simmons,et al.  Maintaining line of sight communications networks between planetary rovers , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[11]  Matthew Powers,et al.  Value-Based Communication Preservation for Mobile Robots , 2004, DARS.

[12]  David Chapman,et al.  Pengi: An Implementation of a Theory of Activity , 1987, AAAI.

[13]  Tucker R. Balch,et al.  Communication in reactive multiagent robotic systems , 1995, Auton. Robots.

[14]  Robin R. Murphy.  Marsupial and Shape-Shifting Robots for Urban Search and Rescue , 2000, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[15]  Erann Gat,et al.  Integrating Planning and Reacting in a Heterogeneous Asynchronous Architecture for Controlling Real-World Mobile Robots , 1992, AAAI.

[16]  J. Redi,et al.  A brief overview of ad hoc networks: challenges and directions , 2002, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[17]  Ronald C. Arkin,et al.  Behavior-Based Robot Navigation for Extended Domains , 1992, Adapt. Behav..