Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface

In order to effectively improve the dynamic characteristics of the fixed metal joint interface, it is important to establish a correct equivalent model of the metal joint interface. In this paper, three equivalent methods for simulating the metal joint interface are analyzed, including the virtual material method, spring damping method, finite element method, and verification by modal experiment. First, according to the contact mechanics model of the constructed metal joint interface, the physical properties of the three-dimensional models of the fixed joint interface are assigned in the ANSYS software. Then, three methods are used for the modal analysis and compared with a modal experiment. The results show that the modal shapes of the three theoretical methods are consistent with those of the experimental modes. The first five natural frequencies obtained by the virtual material method are closest to the experimental natural frequencies, and the errors are within 10%. The errors of the other two methods are between 9% and 39%. Therefore, the virtual material method is a better equivalent method of the metal joint interface.

[1]  P. Sahoo,et al.  Dynamic contact interactions of fractal surfaces , 2017 .

[2]  Jin Jian-xin Research on Bolt Preload Simulation Based on Virtual Material Method , 2012 .

[3]  T. Dietz,et al.  Thermal Contact Resistance Modeling of Non-Flat, Roughened Surfaces With Non-Metallic Coatings , 2001 .

[4]  C. Roques-carmes,et al.  Fractal approach to two-dimensional and three-dimensional surface roughness , 1986 .

[5]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Role of Fractal Geometry in Roughness Characterization and Contact Mechanics of Surfaces , 1990 .

[6]  Weimin Shi,et al.  Surface contact stress-based nonlinear virtual material method for dynamic analysis of bolted joint of machine tool , 2016 .

[7]  Xiaolei Huang,et al.  A new method of virtual material hypothesis-based dynamic modeling on fixed joint interface in machine tools , 2011 .

[8]  A. Majumdar,et al.  Fractal characterization and simulation of rough surfaces , 1990 .

[9]  Lothar Gaul,et al.  Segment-to-segment contact elements for modelling joint interfaces in finite element analysis , 2007 .

[10]  Kai Liu,et al.  Elastoplastic contact mechanics model of rough surface based on fractal theory , 2017 .

[11]  H. Zahouani,et al.  3D fractal-based characterisation for engineered surface topography , 1995 .

[12]  Chris L. Pettit,et al.  Uncertainties and dynamic problems of bolted joints and other fasteners , 2005 .

[13]  Hui Ye,et al.  Virtual material parameter acquisition based on the basic characteristics of the bolt joint interfaces , 2016 .

[14]  Guoxi Li,et al.  Normal contact stiffness of rough surfaces considering oblique asperity contact , 2019, Advances in Mechanical Engineering.

[15]  Xiaopeng Li,et al.  A normal contact stiffness fractal prediction model of dry-friction rough surface and experimental verification , 2017 .