Robustness of Different Features for One-class Classification and Anomaly Detection in Wire Ropes

Automatic visual inspection of wire ropes is an important but challenging task. Anomalies in wire ropes usually are unobtrusive and their detection is a difficult job. Certainly, a reliable anomaly detection is essential to assure the safety of the ropes. A one-class classification approach for the automatic detection of anomalies in wire ropes is presented. Different well-established features from the field of textural defect detection are compared to context-sensitive features extracted by linear prediction. They are used to learn a Gaussian mixture model which represents the faultless rope structure. Outliers are regarded as anomaly. To evaluate the robustness of the method, a training set containing intentionally added, defective samples is used. The generalization ability of the learned model, which is important for practical life, is exploited by testing the model on different data sets from identically constructed ropes. All experiments were performed on real-life rope data. The results prove a high generalization ability, as well as a good robustness to outliers in the training set. The presented approach can exclude up to 90 percent of the rope as faultless without missing one single defect.

[1]  Sameer Singh,et al.  Novelty detection: a review - part 1: statistical approaches , 2003, Signal Process..

[2]  J. Makhoul,et al.  Linear prediction: A tutorial review , 1975, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  C. H. Chen,et al.  Handbook of Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision , 1993 .

[4]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Real-time surface inspection by texture , 2003, Real Time Imaging.

[5]  Joni-Kristian Kämäräinen,et al.  Detection of irregularities in regular patterns , 2008, Machine Vision and Applications.

[6]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Texture classification: are filter banks necessary? , 2003, 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings..

[7]  Joachim Denzler,et al.  Challenging Anomaly Detection in Wire Ropes Using Linear Prediction Combined with One-class Classification , 2008, VMV.

[8]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[9]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Gray Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2000, ECCV.

[10]  D. Bailey,et al.  Frequency Domain Self-filtering for Pattern Detection , 2005 .

[11]  Jukka Iivarinen,et al.  Surface defect detection with histogram-based texture features , 2000, SPIE Optics East.

[12]  Ajay Kumar,et al.  Defect detection in textured materials using Gabor filters , 2000, Conference Record of the 2000 IEEE Industry Applications Conference. Thirty-Fifth IAS Annual Meeting and World Conference on Industrial Applications of Electrical Energy (Cat. No.00CH37129).

[13]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[14]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[15]  Jukka Iivarinen,et al.  Shape-Based Co-occurrence Matrices for Defect Classification , 2005, SCIA.

[16]  Ehsanollah Kabir,et al.  Fabric Defect Detection Using Modified Local Binary Patterns , 2008, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[17]  Victoria J. Hodge,et al.  A Survey of Outlier Detection Methodologies , 2004, Artificial Intelligence Review.