SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines from a Detailed Consensus Process.

Since the publication of Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 1.0) guidelines in 2008, the science of the field has advanced considerably. In this manuscript we describe the development of SQUIRE 2.0 and its key components. We undertook the revision between 2012 and 2015, using 1) semistructured interviews and focus groups to evaluate SQUIRE 1.0 plus feedback from an international steering group; 2) two face-to-face consensus meetings to develop interim drafts; and 3) pilot testing with authors and a public comment period. SQUIRE 2.0 emphasizes the reporting of three key components of systematic efforts to improve the quality, value, and safety of health care: the use of formal and informal theory in planning, implementing, and evaluating improvement work; the context in which the work is done; and the study of the intervention(s). SQUIRE 2.0 is intended for reporting the range of methods used to improve health care, recognizing that they can be complex and multidimensional. It provides common ground to share these discoveries in the scholarly literature (www.squire-statement.org).

[1]  Susan Michie,et al.  Explanation and elaboration of the SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) Guidelines, V.2.0: examples of SQUIRE elements in the healthcare improvement literature , 2016, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[2]  E. Artifon,et al.  Competing interests: None , 2016 .

[3]  Louise Davies,et al.  Findings from a novel approach to publication guideline revision: user road testing of a draft version of SQUIRE 2.0 , 2015, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[4]  Louise Davies,et al.  The SQUIRE Guidelines: an evaluation from the field, 5 years post release , 2015, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[5]  D. Stevens.  SQUIRE and the evolving science of healthcare improvement , 2015, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[6]  Margareth Crisóstomo Portela,et al.  How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types , 2015, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[7]  J. O’Leary,et al.  The effect of the SQUIRE (Standards of QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines on reporting standards in the quality improvement literature: a before-and-after study , 2015, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[8]  Susan Michie,et al.  Demystifying theory and its use in improvement , 2015, BMJ quality & safety.

[9]  J. Wyatt,et al.  Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  I. Philibert,et al.  The next GME accreditation system--rationale and benefits. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  P. Margolis,et al.  The Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ): building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement , 2011, BMJ quality & safety.

[12]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  What context features might be important determinants of the effectiveness of patient safety practice interventions? , 2011, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[13]  J. Øvretveit.  Understanding the conditions for improvement: research to discover which context influences affect improvement success , 2011, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[14]  S. Haque.  Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the East London and City Health Authority Ethic Committee. Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed. , 2011 .

[15]  S Hempel,et al.  Finding order in heterogeneity: types of quality-improvement intervention publications , 2008, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[16]  F Davidoff,et al.  Publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project , 2008, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[17]  P. Mitchell,et al.  Quality and Safety Education for Nurses. , 2007, Nursing outlook.

[18]  M. Eccles,et al.  Planning and Studying Improvement in Patient Care: The Use of Theoretical Perspectives , 2007, The Milbank quarterly.

[19]  Bruce Jennings,et al.  Special Report: The Ethics of Using QI Methods to Improve Health Care Quality and Safety , 2006 .

[20]  F Davidoff,et al.  Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project , 2005, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[21]  K. Shojania,et al.  Evidence-based quality improvement: the state of the science. , 2005, Health affairs.

[22]  Paul Batalden,et al.  General competencies and accreditation in graduate medical education. , 2002, Health affairs.

[23]  Edward J. Huth,et al.  Writing and Publishing in Medicine , 1999 .

[24]  D. Berwick.  About the Institute for Healthcare Improvement , 1993 .