A case for size and shape scaling for understanding nutrient use in breeding sows and growing pigs

Abstract New Visual Image Analysis technologies now allow the hitherto unattainable measurement of animal size and shape. Knowledge of size and shape (and volume) in addition to weight gives new dimensions to pig description. Sow body condition, and consequent nutrient requirement, can be directly and objectively determined for the first time since weight was questioned as an adequate datum upon which to base sow feeding requirements. Relationships could now be drawn for a more direct determination of fitness for slaughter, and of nutrient requirements; in the latter case evidently for maintenance but, on reflection, also for growth. So familiar has the scale of weight become that it is ill appreciated that weight is often used not only for its own sake but rather as an indirect estimation of size and shape. This paper examines the value of the estimation of size and shape for animal description in relation to nutrient use; if not to replace weight entirely, then at least to augment it.

[1]  N. Graham,et al.  Basal metabolic rate in lambs and young sheep , 1974 .

[2]  C. A. Morgan,et al.  Model components for the determination of energy and protein requirements for breeding sows: a review , 1990 .

[3]  H. M. Taylor,et al.  Chemical and dissected composition changes in weaned piglets , 1981 .

[4]  C. Whittemore.  A study of growth responses to nutrient inputs by modelling , 1976, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

[5]  Gerry C. Emmans,et al.  Protein growth in pigs , 1988 .

[6]  C. Whittemore,et al.  Physical and chemical composition of the body of breeding sows with differing body subcutaneous fat depth at parturition, differing nutrition during lactation and differing litter size , 1989 .

[7]  L. Walford,et al.  Bioenergetics and Growth , 1947 .

[8]  Colin T. Whittemore,et al.  The science and practice of pig production , 1995 .

[9]  M. Franklin,et al.  Fat changes in breeding sows. , 1980 .

[10]  Gerry C. Emmans,et al.  Models of pig growth: problems and proposed solutions , 1997 .

[11]  Steven J. Hoff,et al.  A quasi ad-libitum electronic feeding system for gestating sows in loose housing 1 Journal Paper No. , 1998 .

[12]  C. T. Whittemore,et al.  Development of recommended energy and protein allowances for growing pigs , 1983 .

[13]  J. A. Marchant,et al.  Pig growth and conformation monitoring using image analysis , 1999 .

[14]  Colin T. Whittemore,et al.  Theoretical aspects of a flexible model to stimulate protein and lipid growth in pigs , 1976 .

[15]  Denis Bastianelli,et al.  Modelling the mechanisms of pig growth , 1997 .

[16]  C. Whittemore.  Causes and Consequences of Change in the Mature Size of the Domestic Pig , 1994 .

[17]  M. Verstegen.  Influence of environmental temperature on energy metabolism of growing pigs housed individually and in groups , 1971 .

[18]  A. van Es,et al.  Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals , 1998 .

[19]  W. C. Smith,et al.  The use of specific gravity and its reciprocal in predicting the carcass composition of pigs slaughtered at three weights. , 1964 .

[20]  C. Whittemore,et al.  Reproductive performance, body weight and body condition of breeding sows with differing body fatness at parturition, differing nutrition during lactation, and differing litter size , 1989 .

[21]  J. Hammond.  Progress in the physiology of farm animals , 1954 .