Transaction and abatement costs of carbon-sink projects in developing countries

Projects in the forestry sector, and land-use change and forestry projects more generally, have the potential to help mitigate global warming by acting as sinks for greenhouse gasses, particularly CO2. However, concerns have been expressed that participation in carbon-sink projects may be constrained by high costs. This problem may be particularly severe for projects involving smallholders in developing countries. Of particular concern are the transaction costs incurred in developing projects, measuring, certifying, and selling the carbon-sequestration services generated by such projects. This paper addresses these issues by reviewing the implications of transaction and abatement costs in carbon-sequestration projects. An approach to estimating abatement costs is demonstrated through four case studies of agroforestry systems located in Sumatra, Indonesia. A typology of transaction costs is presented and related to existing pilot projects. The paper concludes with recommendations to reduce the disadvantages that smallholders may face in capturing the opportunities offered by carbon markets.

[1]  S. Scherr,et al.  Forest carbon and local livelihoods: assessment of opportunities and policy recommendations , 2002 .

[2]  K. G. MacDicken,et al.  A Guide to Monitoring Carbon Storage in Forestry and Agroforestry Projects , 1998 .

[3]  S. Hanna,et al.  Efficiencies of user participation in natural resource management. , 1995 .

[4]  R. Wise,et al.  Carbon-Accounting Methods and Reforestation Incentives , 2003 .

[5]  Ronald D. Lile,et al.  Implementing the Clean Development Mechanism: Lessons from U.S. Private-Sector Participation in Activities Implemented Jointly , 1998 .

[6]  M. Pinard,et al.  Elements of a certification system for forestry-based carbon offset projects , 2000 .

[7]  N. Carter.  Halting degradation of natural resources: is there a role for rural communities? , 1996 .

[8]  Q. Ketterings,et al.  Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predicting above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forests , 2001 .

[9]  Joyotee Smith,et al.  Afforestation and reforestation in the clean development mechanism of the Kyoto Protocol: implications for forests and forest people , 2002 .

[10]  R. Culas.  Forestry, non-forest sector policies and the environment: a review , 2006 .

[11]  R. Tipper,et al.  An economic analysis of the potential for carbon sequestration by forests: evidence from southern Mexico , 2000 .

[12]  G. Brady.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[13]  K. Macdicken,et al.  Carbon Monitoring Costs and their Effect on Incentives to Sequester Carbon through Forestry , 2004 .

[14]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry , 2015 .

[15]  M. van Noordwijk,et al.  Alternatives to slash-and-burn in Indonesia: summary report and synthesis of phase II , 1998 .

[16]  R. Matthews,et al.  The Economics of Institutions and the , 1986 .

[17]  Jean-Philippe Platteau,et al.  Halting degradation of natural resources: is there a role for rural communities? , 2000 .

[18]  M. van Noordwijk,et al.  An analysis of the economic values of novel cropping systems in N. E. Thailand and S. Sumatra , 2000 .

[19]  Gregg Marland,et al.  Accounting for sequestered carbon: the question of permanence , 2001 .

[20]  B. A. D. Aghion,et al.  On the design of a credit agreement with peer monitoring , 1999 .

[21]  Joseph E. Stiglitz,et al.  Peer Monitoring and Credit Markets , 1990 .

[22]  Oscar Cacho,et al.  Tree-crop interactions and their environmental and economic implications in the presence of carbon-sequestration payments , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[23]  J. Sayer,et al.  Harnessing carbon markets for tropical forest conservation: towards a more realistic assessment , 2000, Environmental Conservation.

[24]  D. Glover,et al.  Small Farmers, Big Business: Contract Farming and Rural Development , 1990 .

[25]  L. Lipper,et al.  Climate Change Mitigation Measures in the Agro-forestry Sector and Biodiversity Futures Abatement and Transaction Costs of Carbon-sink Projects Involving Smallholders Abatement and Transaction Costs of Carbon-sink Projects Involving Smallholders , 2022 .

[26]  K. Baumert,et al.  Designing the Clean Development Mechanism to Meet the Needs of a Broad Range of Interests , 2000 .

[27]  G. Vincent,et al.  Predictors of tree growth in a Dipterocarp-based agroforest: a critical assessment , 2002 .