Huffman-Coded Sphere Shaping and Distribution Matching Algorithms via Lookup Tables

In this article, we study amplitude shaping schemes for the probabilistic amplitude shaping (PAS) framework as well as algorithms for constant-composition distribution matching (CCDM). Huffman-coded sphere shaping (HCSS) is discussed in detail, which internally uses Huffman coding to determine the composition to be used and relies on conventional CCDM algorithms for mapping and demapping. Numerical simulations show that HCSS closes the performance gap between distribution matching schemes and sphere shaping techniques such as enumerative sphere shaping (ESS). HCSS is based on an architecture that is different from the trellis-based setup of ESS. It allows to tailor the used HCSS compositions to the transmission channel and to take into account complexity constraints. We further discuss in detail multiset ranking (MR) and subset ranking (SR) as alternatives to arithmetic-coding (AC) CCDM. The advantage of MR over AC is that it requires less sequential operations for mapping. SR operates on binary alphabets only, which can introduce some additional rate loss when a nonbinary-to-binary transformation is required. However, the binomial coefficients required for SR can be precomputed and stored in a lookup table (LUT). We perform an analysis of rate loss and decoding performance for the proposed techniques and compare them to other prominent amplitude shaping schemes. For medium to long block lengths, MR-HCSS and SR-HCSS are shown to have similar performance to ESS. SR-HCSS and uniform 64QAM are compared in additive white Gaussian noise simulations and shaping gains of 0.5 dB and 1 dB are demonstrated with 1 kbit and 100 kbit LUT size, respectively.

[1]  D. A. Bell,et al.  Information Theory and Reliable Communication , 1969 .

[2]  Junho Cho,et al.  Trans-Atlantic field trial using probabilistically shaped 64-QAM at high spectral efficiencies and single-carrier real-time 250-Gb/s 16-QAM , 2017, 2017 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[3]  Patrick Schulte,et al.  Constant Composition Distribution Matching , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[4]  Toshiaki Koike-Akino,et al.  Multiset-Partition Distribution Matching , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[5]  Georg Böcherer,et al.  On Probabilistic Shaping of Quadrature Amplitude Modulation for the Nonlinear Fiber Channel , 2016, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[6]  Robert F. H. Fischer,et al.  Precoding and Signal Shaping for Digital Transmission , 2002 .

[7]  Patrick Schulte,et al.  Shell Mapping for Distribution matching , 2018, ArXiv.

[8]  Alex Alvarado,et al.  Analysis and Optimisation of Distribution Matching for the Nonlinear Fibre Channel , 2019, 45th European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC 2019).

[9]  Georg Böcherer,et al.  LDPC coded modulation with probabilistic shaping for optical fiber systems , 2015, 2015 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[10]  G. David Forney,et al.  Efficient Modulation for Band-Limited Channels , 1984, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[11]  Wen Xu,et al.  Bit-Level Probabilistically Shaped Coded Modulation , 2017, IEEE Communications Letters.

[12]  A. Robert Calderbank,et al.  Nonequiprobable signaling on the Gaussian channel , 1990, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[13]  Patrick Schulte,et al.  Bandwidth Efficient and Rate-Matched Low-Density Parity-Check Coded Modulation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[14]  Feng-Wen Sun,et al.  Approaching capacity by equiprobable signaling on the Gaussian channel , 1993, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[15]  Joseph M. Kahn,et al.  Rate-Adaptive Coded Modulation for Fiber-Optic Communications , 2014, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[16]  Toshiaki Koike-Akino,et al.  Coded Modulation for Next-Generation Optical Communications , 2018, 2018 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exposition (OFC).

[17]  Erik Agrell,et al.  Adaptive coded modulation for nonlinear fiber-optical channels , 2012, 2012 IEEE Globecom Workshops.

[18]  Polina Bayvel,et al.  Sensitivity Gains by Mismatched Probabilistic Shaping for Optical Communication Systems , 2015, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[19]  Steven A. Tretter,et al.  On optimal shaping of multidimensional constellations , 1994, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[20]  Marcin Pikus,et al.  Arithmetic Coding Based Multi-Composition Codes for Bit-Level Distribution Matching , 2019, 2019 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[21]  Erik Agrell,et al.  Hierarchical Distribution Matching for Probabilistically Shaped Coded Modulation , 2018, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[22]  Lars P. B. Christensen,et al.  Constellation Shaping for Fiber-Optic Channels With QAM and High Spectral Efficiency , 2014, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[23]  B. Zhu,et al.  Coded PDM-OFDM Transmission With Shaped 256-Iterative-Polar-Modulation Achieving 11.15-b/s/Hz Intrachannel Spectral Efficiency and 800-km Reach , 2013, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[24]  Junho Cho,et al.  Prefix-Free Code Distribution Matching for Probabilistic Constellation Shaping , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[25]  Yoshiaki Kisaka,et al.  Laser Phase Noise Tolerance of Uniform and Probabilistically Shaped QAM Signals for High Spectral Efficiency Systems , 2020, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[26]  Patrick Schulte,et al.  High Throughput Probabilistic Shaping with Product Distribution Matching , 2017, ArXiv.

[27]  Toshiaki Koike-Akino,et al.  Huffman coded sphere shaping with short length and reduced complexity , 2019, 45th European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC 2019).

[28]  Toshiaki Koike-Akino,et al.  Parallel-Amplitude Architecture and Subset Ranking for Fast Distribution Matching , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[29]  Frank R. Kschischang,et al.  A Pragmatic Coded Modulation Scheme for High-Spectral-Efficiency Fiber-Optic Communications , 2012, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[30]  Toshiaki Koike-Akino,et al.  Analysis of Nonlinear Fiber Interactions for Finite-Length Constant-Composition Sequences , 2020, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[31]  G. David Forney Trellis shaping , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[32]  Ting Wang,et al.  Iterative Polar Quantization-Based Modulation to Achieve Channel Capacity in Ultrahigh-Speed Optical Communication Systems , 2010, IEEE Photonics Journal.

[33]  Jorg-Peter Elbers,et al.  Mitigating Fiber Nonlinearities by Short-Length Probabilistic Shaping , 2020, 2020 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[34]  Patrick Schulte,et al.  Experimental demonstration of capacity increase and rate-adaptation by probabilistically shaped 64-QAM , 2015, 2015 European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC).

[35]  Georg Böcherer,et al.  Experimental Comparison of Probabilistic Shaping Methods for Unrepeated Fiber Transmission , 2017, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[36]  Frans M. J. Willems,et al.  Enumerative Sphere Shaping for Wireless Communications With Short Packets , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[37]  Polina Bayvel,et al.  A Simple Nonlinearity-Tailored Probabilistic Shaping Distribution for Square QAM , 2017, 2018 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exposition (OFC).

[38]  Alex Alvarado,et al.  Probabilistic Shaping for Finite Blocklengths: Distribution Matching and Sphere Shaping , 2020, Entropy.