A Scalable Data-Driven Monitoring Approach for Distribution Systems

This paper introduces a new data-driven bottom-up monitoring approach for distribution systems. In this approach, local estimations of the subsections into which the system is split are performed independently, thus leading to a scalable architecture. The monitoring approach is focused only on the estimation of voltage magnitude rather than the complete state of the system. This reduces the measurement requirements significantly, thus addressing economical and technical concerns for existing systems, while staying open to accommodating further incremental improvements in the available data and data quality. The estimation of each section is realized via an artificial neural network (ANN), for which a set of parameterizations is available to cope with different operating conditions. The estimation convergence is achieved even with relatively few measurements, although accuracy varies depending on the available measurements. At the Medium Voltage (MV) level, where reconfiguration is common, a configuration identification unit chooses the right ANN, the one trained for the actual network configuration. The estimation process is computationally simple and can be executed on low-cost hardware, as demonstrated in this paper by the implementation on a BeagleBone Black board. To demonstrate the concept, a prototype and a laboratory setup have been developed. The experimental test results are presented both for an Low Voltage distribution system and an MV distribution system.

[1]  Paolo Attilio Pegoraro,et al.  Effects of Measurements and Pseudomeasurements Correlation in Distribution System State Estimation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[2]  Raphael Caire,et al.  Neural Networks to Improve Distribution State Estimation—Volt Var Control Performances , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[3]  S. M. Shahidehpour,et al.  State estimation for electric power distribution systems in quasi real-time conditions , 1993 .

[4]  Hao Yu,et al.  Selection of Proper Neural Network Sizes and Architectures—A Comparative Study , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[5]  C. Liguori,et al.  Neural networks and pseudo-measurements for real-time monitoring of distribution systems , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference - IMTC '95.

[6]  A. W. Kelley,et al.  State estimation for real-time monitoring of distribution systems , 1994 .

[7]  Antonello Monti,et al.  Impact of Different Uncertainty Sources on a Three-Phase State Estimator for Distribution Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[8]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1966 .

[9]  Bogdan M. Wilamowski,et al.  Intelligent Systems , 2011 .

[10]  Walmir Freitas,et al.  Method for determining the maximum allowable penetration level of distributed generation without steady-state voltage violations , 2010 .

[11]  Junqi Liu,et al.  Trade-Offs in PMU Deployment for State Estimation in Active Distribution Grids , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[12]  K. Strunz,et al.  Design of benchmark of medium voltage distribution network for investigation of DG integration , 2006, 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[13]  G. Strbac,et al.  Distribution System State Estimation Using an Artificial Neural Network Approach for Pseudo Measurement Modeling , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  R. B. Vinter,et al.  Meter Placement for Distribution System State Estimation: An Ordinal Optimization Approach , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  Jianzhong Wu,et al.  A robust state estimator for medium voltage distribution networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis: Draper/Applied Regression Analysis , 1998 .

[17]  Antonello Monti,et al.  Design considerations for artificial neural network-based estimators in monitoring of distribution systems , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems Proceedings (AMPS).

[18]  Junqi Liu,et al.  A Fast and Accurate PMU Algorithm for P+M Class Measurement of Synchrophasor and Frequency , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[19]  Ferdinanda Ponci,et al.  New monitoring approach for distribution systems , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC) Proceedings.

[20]  Kai Strunz,et al.  A BENCHMARK LOW VOLTAGE MICROGRID NETWORK , 2005 .

[21]  Alessandro Ferrero,et al.  Uncertainty: Only One Mathematical Approach to Its Evaluation and Expression? , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[22]  Paolo Attilio Pegoraro,et al.  Efficient Branch-Current-Based Distribution System State Estimation Including Synchronized Measurements , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.