Soft morphological processing of tactile stimuli for autonomous category formation

Sensor morphology is a fundamental aspect of tactile sensing technology. Design choices induce stimuli to be morphologically processed, changing the sensory perception of the touched objects and affecting inference at a later processing stage. We develop a framework to analyze the filtered sensor response and observe the correspondent change in tactile information. We test the morphological processing effects on the tactile stimuli by integrating a capacitive tactile sensor into a flat end-effector and creating three soft silicon-based filters with varying thickness (3mm, 6mm and 10mm). We incorporate the end-effector onto a robotic arm. We control the arm in order to apply a calibrated force onto 4 objects, and retrieve tactile images. We create an unsupervised inference process through the use of Principal Component Analysis and K-Means Clustering. We use the process to group the sensed objects into 2 classes and observe how different soft filters affect the clustering results. The sensor response with the 3mm soft filter allows for edges to be the feature with most variance (captured by PC A) and induces the association of edged objects. With thicker soft filters the associations change, and with a 10mm filter the sensor response results more diverse for objects with different elongation. We show that the clustering is intrinsically driven by the morphology of the sensor and that the robot's world understanding changes according to it.

[1]  F. Iida,et al.  Adaptation of sensor morphology: an integrative view of perception from biologically inspired robotics perspective , 2016, Interface Focus.

[2]  Jonathan Rossiter,et al.  Development of a tactile sensor based on biologically inspired edge encoding , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Advanced Robotics.

[3]  S. P. Lloyd,et al.  Least squares quantization in PCM , 1982, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[4]  A L Dellon,et al.  Human pressure perception values for constant and moving one- and two-point discrimination. , 1992, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  Gordon Cheng,et al.  Humanoids learn touch modalities identification via multi-modal robotic skin and robust tactile descriptors , 2015, Adv. Robotics.

[6]  Makoto Shimojo,et al.  Mechanical filtering effect of elastic cover for tactile sensor , 1997, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[7]  Dori Derdikman,et al.  Pre-neuronal morphological processing of object location by individual whiskers , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  Mari Velonaki,et al.  Interpretation of the modality of touch on an artificial arm covered with an EIT-based sensitive skin , 2012, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[9]  Maurizio Valle,et al.  A tensor-based approach to touch modality classification by using machine learning , 2015, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[10]  Giorgio Metta,et al.  Methods and Technologies for the Implementation of Large-Scale Robot Tactile Sensors , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[11]  Fumiya Iida,et al.  Localized differential sensing of soft deformable surfaces , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[12]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  Tactile Sensing—From Humans to Humanoids , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[13]  E. Ahissar,et al.  Perception as a closed-loop convergence process , 2016, eLife.

[14]  Michael E. Tipping,et al.  Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis , 1999 .

[15]  Surya Girinatha Nurzaman,et al.  SVAS3: Strain Vector Aided Sensorization of Soft Structures , 2014, Sensors.

[16]  Nathan F. Lepora,et al.  Addition of a Biomimetic Fingerprint on an Artificial Fingertip Enhances Tactile Spatial Acuity , 2017, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.