Using hidden multi-state Markov models with multi-parameter volcanic data to provide empirical evidence for alert level decision-support

For the purposes of eruption forecasting and hazard mitigation, a volcanic crisis may be represented as a staged progression of states of unrest, each with its own timescale and likelihood of transition to other states (or to climactic eruption). If the state conditions can be interpreted physically, e.g., in terms of advancing materials failure, this knowledge could be used directly to inform decisions on alert level setting. A multi-state Markov process provides one simple model for defining states and for estimating rates of switching between states. However, for eruptive processes, such states are not directly observable and must be inferred from latent markers, such as seismic activity, gas output, deformation rates, etc., some of which may be contradictory. Interpretations of uncertain data will be liable to error, so a model is needed which can simultaneously estimate both elements: the transition likelihood of a hidden process and the probabilities of state misclassification. We describe the concept and underlying principles of continuous-time hidden Markov models and demonstrate them in a decision-support context with a preliminary working implementation using MULTIMO data. Where multi-parameter streams of raw, processed or conditioned data of different kinds are available, these can be input in near real-time to appropriate hidden multi-state Markov models, the outputs of each providing their own objective analyses of eruptive state in probabilistic terms. These separate, multiple indicators of state can then be input into a Bayesian Belief Network framework for weighing and combining them as different strands of evidence, together with other observations, data, interpretations and expert judgment.

[1]  Simon G. Thompson,et al.  Multistate Markov models for disease progression with classification error , 2003 .

[2]  James A. Feigenbaum,et al.  A statistical analysis of log-periodic precursors to financial crashes* , 2001, cond-mat/0101031.

[3]  Kristy F. Tiampo,et al.  Linear pattern dynamics in nonlinear threshold systems , 2000 .

[4]  G. Woo The Mathematics of Natural Catastrophes , 1999 .

[5]  Roberto Carniel,et al.  Multivariate stochastic modelling: towards forecasts of paroxysmal phases at Stromboli , 2003 .

[6]  T. Menand,et al.  A phenomenological model for precursor volcanic eruptions , 2001, Nature.

[7]  H. Langer,et al.  Application of Artificial Neural Networks for the classification of the seismic transients at Soufrière Hills volcano, Montserrat , 2003 .

[8]  R. R. Cornelius,et al.  Graphical and PC-software analysis of volcano eruption precursors according to the Materials Failure Forecast Method (FFM) , 1995 .

[9]  Daniel A. Henderson,et al.  Fitting Markov chain models to discrete state series such as DNA sequences , 1999 .

[10]  Roberto Carniel,et al.  Ambrym, Vanuatu (July–August 2000): spectral and dynamical transitions on the hours-to-days timescale , 2003 .

[11]  Dinesh Kumar,et al.  Analysis of the unrest of active volcanoes using variations of the base level noise seismic spectrum , 2006 .

[12]  J. Feigenbaum,et al.  A Bayesian analysis of log-periodic precursors to financial crashes , 2001 .

[13]  Warner Marzocchi,et al.  A new perspective in identifying the precursory patterns of eruptions , 2004 .

[14]  R Kay,et al.  A Markov model for analysing cancer markers and disease states in survival studies. , 1986, Biometrics.

[15]  Lain L. MacDonald,et al.  Hidden Markov and Other Models for Discrete- valued Time Series , 1997 .

[16]  Ramón Ortiz,et al.  Spectral and dynamical hints on the time scale of preparation of the 5 April 2003 explosion at Stromboli volcano , 2006 .

[17]  R. R. Cornelius,et al.  Prospects for eruption prediction in near real-time , 1991, Nature.

[18]  Willy P Aspinall,et al.  Evidence-based volcanology: application to eruption crises , 2003 .

[19]  I. Main APPLICABILITY OF TIME-TO-FAILURE ANALYSIS TO ACCELERATED STRAIN BEFORE EARTHQUAKES AND VOLCANIC ERUPTIONS , 1999 .

[20]  G. Thompson,et al.  DEVIN: A Forecasting Approach Using Stochastic Methods Applied to the Soufrière Hills Volcano , 2006 .

[21]  C. Bonadonna,et al.  Exploring links between physical and probabilistic models of volcanic eruptions: The Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat , 2003 .

[22]  R. Carniel,et al.  A user-friendly, dynamic web environment for remote data browsing and analysis of multiparametric geophysical data within the MULTIMO project , 2006 .

[23]  D. Hawkins,et al.  A nonparametric multivariate cumulative sum procedure for detecting shifts in all directions , 2003 .

[24]  Christopher R. J. Kilburn,et al.  Slow rock fracture as eruption precursor at Soufriere Hills Volcano, Montserrat , 1998 .

[25]  H. Langer,et al.  Automatic classification and a-posteriori analysis of seismic event identification at Soufriere Hills volcano, Montserrat , 2006 .

[26]  Christopher R. J. Kilburn,et al.  Multiscale fracturing as a key to forecasting volcanic eruptions , 2003 .

[27]  E. S. Page AN IMPROVEMENT TO WALD'S APPROXIMATION FOR SOME PROPERTIES OF SEQUENTIAL TESTS , 1954 .

[28]  B. Silverman,et al.  Wavelets: The Key to Intermittent Information? , 2000 .

[29]  Roberto Carniel,et al.  Stochastic modelling at Stromboli: a volcano with remarkable memory , 2001 .

[30]  J. Latchman,et al.  Soufrière Hills Eruption, Montserrat, 1995–1997: Volcanic earthquake locations and fault plane solutions , 1998 .

[31]  B. Voight,et al.  A method for prediction of volcanic eruptions , 1988, Nature.

[32]  W. Aspinall,et al.  The 1995–1998 eruption of the Soufriére Hills volcano, Montserrat, WI , 2000, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[33]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Testing and dating of structural changes in practice , 2003, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[34]  H. D. Miller,et al.  The Theory Of Stochastic Processes , 1977, The Mathematical Gazette.