Learning Orientation, Process Innovation, and Firm Performance in Manufacturing Industry

Firms in manufacturing industry require a strong learning orientation to improve their process innovation capability. Learning orientation can help them to gain competitive advantage. Using data from 534 plants in manufacturing industry in Guangdong Province, China, this study investigated the relationships among learning orientation, process innovation, and firm performance through structural equation modeling. This study found that learning orientation has a direct and positive impact on process innovation, process innovation has a direct and positive impact on firm performance, and learning orientation doesn’t have a direct and significant impact on firm performance. We also found that process innovation is a full mediator of the relationship between learning orientation and firm performance.

[1]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[2]  Linjia Tang,et al.  The Evaluation Criteria on ICT Enterprises Innovation Capability-Evidence from Zhejiang Province , 2011 .

[3]  Robert M. Morgan,et al.  The Resource-Advantage Theory of Competition: Dynamics, Path Dependencies, and Evolutionary Dimensions , 1996 .

[4]  S. Liao,et al.  Relationships between knowledge inertia, organizational learning and organization innovation , 2008 .

[5]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[6]  Jaehoon Rhee,et al.  Drivers of innovativeness and performance for innovative SMEs in South Korea: Mediation of learning orientation , 2010 .

[7]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Business Unit Strategy, Managerial Characteristics, and Business Unit Effectiveness at Strategy Implementation , 1984 .

[8]  John C. Narver,et al.  Market Orientation and the Learning Organization , 1995 .

[9]  Erwin Danneels.  The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences , 2002 .

[10]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[11]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Organizational Improvisation and Organizational Memory , 1998 .

[12]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[13]  G. Hult,et al.  Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance , 2004 .

[14]  J. Alegre,et al.  Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: an empirical test , 2008 .

[15]  James M. Sinkula,et al.  A framework for market-based organizational learning: Linking values, knowledge, and behavior , 1997 .

[16]  G. Hult,et al.  Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination , 1998 .

[17]  Nancy M. Dixon,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Review of the Literature with Implications for HRD Professionals. , 1992 .

[18]  E. L. Nichols,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING AS A STRATEGIC RESOURCE IN SUPPLY MANAGEMENT , 2003 .

[19]  R. Calantone,et al.  Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance , 2002 .

[20]  P. Bentler,et al.  Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification , 1998 .

[21]  Kenneth R. Deans,et al.  Innovation Characteristics, Perceived Risk, Permissibility and Trustworthiness in the Adoption of Mobile Marketing , 2010, J. Convergence Inf. Technol..