Automated and reproducible segmentation of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue from abdominal MRI

Objectives:(1) To develop a fully automated algorithm for segmentation of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), excluding intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) and bone marrow (BM), from axial abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. (2) To evaluate the algorithm accuracy and total method reproducibility using a semi-automatically segmented reference and data from repeated measurements.Background:MRI is a widely used in adipose tissue (AT) assessment. Manual analysis of MRI data is time consuming and biased by the operator. Automated analysis spares resources and increase reproducibility. Fully automated algorithms have been presented. However, reproducibility analysis has not been performed nor has methods for exclusion of IMAT and BM been presented.Methods:In total, 49 data sets from 31 subjects were acquired using a clinical 1.5 T MRI scanner. Thirteen data sets were used in the derivation of the automated algorithm and 36 were used in the validation. Common image analysis tools such as thresholding, morphological operations and geometrical models were used to segment VAT and SAT. Accuracy was assessed using a semi-automatically created reference. Reproducibility was assessed from repeated measurements.Results:Resulting AT volumes from the automated analysis and the reference were not found to differ significantly (2.0±14% and 0.84±2.7%, given as mean±s.d., for VAT and SAT, respectively). The automated analysis of the repeated measurements data significantly increased the reproducibility of the VAT measurements. One athletic subject with very small amounts of AT was considered to be an outlier.Conclusions:An automated method for segmentation of VAT and SAT and exclusion of IMAT and BM from abdominal MRI data has been reported. The accuracy and reproducibility of the method has also been demonstrated using a semi-automatically segmented reference and analysis of repeated acquisitions. The accuracy of the method is limited in lean subjects.

[1]  B. Wajchenberg.  Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: their relation to the metabolic syndrome. , 2000, Endocrine reviews.

[2]  Celina Imielinska,et al.  Adipose tissue quantification by imaging methods: a proposed classification. , 2003, Obesity research.

[3]  Stanley Heshka,et al.  Visceral adipose tissue: relations between single-slice areas and total volume. , 2004, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[4]  D. N. Firmin,et al.  Automatic MRI adipose tissue mapping using overlapping mosaics , 2007, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[5]  D. Levy,et al.  Obesity and the risk of heart failure. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  R. Ross,et al.  Adipose tissue distribution measured by magnetic resonance imaging in obese women. , 1993, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[7]  J. Seidell,et al.  Reproducibility of fat area measurements in young, non-obese subjects by computerized analysis of magnetic resonance images , 1997, International Journal of Obesity.

[8]  Ovidiu Ghita,et al.  Rapid automated measurement of body fat distribution from whole-body MRI. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  Hans Frimmel,et al.  Whole‐body T1 mapping improves the definition of adipose tissue: Consequences for automated image analysis , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  Rafael C. González,et al.  Local Determination of a Moving Contrast Edge , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  S Heshka,et al.  Visceral adipose tissue: relationships between single slice areas at different locations and obesity-related health risks , 2007, International Journal of Obesity.

[12]  Hugues Benoit-Cattin,et al.  Intensity non-uniformity correction in MRI: Existing methods and their validation , 2006, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  Robert Ross,et al.  Does measurement site for visceral and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue alter associations with the metabolic syndrome? , 2006, Diabetes care.

[14]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  A framework for evaluating image segmentation algorithms , 2006, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[15]  F. Schick,et al.  Standardized assessment of whole body adipose tissue topography by MRI , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  Luigi Landini,et al.  An accurate and robust method for unsupervised assessment of abdominal fat by MRI , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  R. Ross.  Advances in the application of imaging methods in applied and clinical physiology , 2003, Acta Diabetologica.

[18]  N. Otsu.  A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[19]  R Guardo,et al.  Quantification of adipose tissue by MRI: relationship with anthropometric variables. , 1992, Journal of applied physiology.

[20]  Y. Miyazaki,et al.  Separate contribution of diabetes, total fat mass, and fat topography to glucose production, gluconeogenesis, and glycogenolysis. , 2004, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[21]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[22]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[23]  P. Kopelman.  Obesity as a medical problem , 2000, Nature.

[24]  J V Hajnal,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of total body fat. , 1998, Journal of applied physiology.

[25]  B. Rosen,et al.  Overall body fat and regional fat distribution in young women: quantification with MR imaging. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  P-W Lin,et al.  Fully automated large-scale assessment of visceral and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue by magnetic resonance imaging , 2006, International Journal of Obesity.

[27]  W. Totty,et al.  Measurement of fat distribution by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1989, Investigative radiology.