The Participation Divide Among "Online Experts": Experience, Skills and Psychological Factors as Predictors of College Students' Web Content Creation

This study explored factors that predict online content creation among college students. A Web-based survey revealed that there are differences by gender, race, and age even among this wired group. Drawing from literature on technology adoption, the digital divide, and self-determination theory, this study found that psychological factors–perceived competence and both extrinsic and intrinsic motivations–predict content creation. Among the experience variables, having a computer in the students' own room is associated with content creation when controlling for all other factors. The gender divide disappears when experience, skills, perceived competence, and intrinsic motivation are considered. Finally, a new racial gap emerged; whites are less likely than minorities to participate in the Web even after controlling for all other variables. An earlier version of this paper received an award in the Jung-Sook Lee Student Paper Competition of the Communication and Technology Division, Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication annual conference, Boston, August, 2009. The author would like to thank Sebastian Valenzuela and Dr. Paula Poindexter for their helpful comments.

[1]  Steve Jones,et al.  U.S. College Students' Internet Use: Race, Gender and Digital Divides , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[2]  Johannes A.G.M..  The deepening Divide: Inequality in the information society. , 2005 .

[3]  Mary Madden and Susannah Fox,et al.  Riding the Waves of “Web 2.0” , 2006 .

[4]  Nir Kshetri,et al.  GENDER AND INTERNET USAGE , 2004 .

[5]  S. Preston,et al.  Educational differentials in mortality: United States, 1979-85. , 1996, Social science & medicine.

[6]  Susannah Fox,et al.  Generations online in 2009 , 2009 .

[7]  L. Pelletier,et al.  Client Motivation for Therapy Scale: a measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation for therapy. , 1997, Journal of personality assessment.

[8]  Teresa Correa,et al.  Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users' personality and social media use , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 1990 .

[10]  J. Newhagen,et al.  Media Access : Social and Psychological Dimensions of New Technology Use , 2003 .

[11]  E. Hargittai,et al.  THE PARTICIPATION DIVIDE: Content creation and sharing in the digital age1 , 2008 .

[12]  R. Ryan,et al.  Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. , 1982 .

[13]  P. Howard,et al.  Days and Nights on the Internet , 2001 .

[14]  James E. Katz,et al.  Motivations for and barriers to Internet usage: results of a national public opinion survey , 1997, Internet Res..

[15]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Survey Measures of Web-Oriented Digital Literacy , 2005 .

[16]  Alladi Venkatesh,et al.  Beyond Adoption: Development and Application of a Use-Diffusion Model , 2004 .

[17]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide , 2007, New Media Soc..

[18]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[19]  Andrew F. Hayes,et al.  Statistical Methods for Communication Science , 2005 .

[20]  D. Dillman.  Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[21]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[22]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage , 1999 .

[23]  J. Cooper,et al.  The digital divide: the special case of gender , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[24]  A. Bandura,et al.  Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. , 1983 .

[25]  Jos de Haan,et al.  A MULTIFACETED DYNAMIC MODEL OF THE DIGITAL DIVIDE , 2004 .

[26]  Joo-Young Jung,et al.  Exploring the Digital Divide , 2001, Commun. Res..

[27]  R. Vallerand,et al.  On the causal effects of perceived competence on intrinsic motivation: A test of cognitive evaluation theory. , 1984 .

[28]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[29]  Erik P. Bucy,et al.  Social Access to the Internet , 1999 .

[30]  P. Valkenburg,et al.  Adolescents’ internet use: Testing the “disappearing digital divide” versus the “emerging digital differentiation” approach , 2006 .

[31]  Jan van Dijk.  Divides in Succession: Possession, Skills, and Use of New Media for Societal Participation , 2003 .

[32]  Marianne Miserandino,et al.  Children Who Do Well in School: Individual Differences in Perceived Competence and Autonomy in Above-Average Children , 1996 .

[33]  Thompson S. H. Teo.  Demographic and motivation variables associated with Internet usage activities , 2001, Internet Res..

[34]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills , 2002, First Monday.

[35]  Andrew K. Przybylski,et al.  The Motivational Pull of Video Games: A Self-Determination Theory Approach , 2006 .

[36]  Paul M. Haridakis,et al.  The Role of Motivation and Media Involvement in Explaining Internet Dependency , 2008 .

[37]  E. Deci,et al.  Facilitating internalization: the self-determination theory perspective. , 1994, Journal of personality.

[38]  J. V. Dijk.  Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings , 2006 .

[39]  John E. Newhagen,et al.  Routes to Media Access , 2003 .

[40]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[41]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  A Propositional Inventory for New Diffusion Research , 1985 .

[42]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Managing motivation: The impact of supervisor feedback on subordinate task interest. , 1986 .

[43]  Martin Underwood,et al.  A Prospective Study of the Relationships Between Motivational Orientations and Perceived Competence with Intrinsic Motivation and Achievement in a Teacher Education Course , 1995 .

[44]  Keith Roe,et al.  The digital divide in the playstation generation: Self-efficacy, locus of control and ICT adoption among adolescents , 2006 .

[45]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[46]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Bridging the Racial Divide on the Internet , 1998, Science.

[47]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation , 1999, MIS Q..

[48]  S. Livingstone.  Media Literacy and the Challenge of New Information and Communication Technologies , 2004 .

[49]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[50]  Amanda Lenhart,et al.  Adults and social network websites , 2009 .

[51]  A. Rubin,et al.  Predictors of Internet Use , 2000 .

[52]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  Beyond Access: the Digital Divide and Internet Uses and Gratifications , 2003 .

[53]  Robert LaRose,et al.  Internet Self-Efficacy and the Psychology of the Digital Divide , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[54]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Digital Inequality , 2008, Commun. Res..

[55]  Sudha Ram,et al.  Innovativeness in product usage: A comparison of early adopters and early majority , 1994 .

[56]  Cindy Carlson,et al.  Ethnic Differences in Processes Contributing to the Self-Esteem of Early Adolescent Girls , 2000 .

[57]  R. Vallerand,et al.  The temporal relationship between perceived competence and self-determined motivation. , 1994, The Journal of social psychology.

[58]  Ingrid Bachmann,et al.  Wave of Hope: African American Youth Use Media and Engage More Civically, Politically Than Whites , 2010 .

[59]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[60]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Differences in Actual and Perceived Online Skills: The Role of Gender* , 2006 .