Exploring effects of source similarity, message valence, and receiver regulatory focus on yelp review persuasiveness and purchase intentions

This study is among the first to investigate the impact of message, source, and receiver characteristics on user attitudes toward Yelp reviews, with the subsequent impact of these attitudinal evaluations on review persuasiveness. Specifically, it examines the roles of review valence (positive/negative) and sidedness (one-sided/two-sided), as well as perceived similarity with the reviewer, on user perceptions of helpfulness, trustworthiness, and credibility of the review. The study also tests moderating effects of perceived source similarity and user regulatory focus on the relationships among message characteristics, attitudinal variables, and purchase intentions. Our results disconfirm the negativity bias reported in previous studies and indicate that positive reviews are perceived as more trustworthy, credible, and helpful than negative or two-sided reviews. Review helpfulness and credibility, in turn, positively impacts its persuasiveness, with regulatory focus playing a complex nuanced role in the persuasiveness – behavioral intentions relationship. Based on the findings, future research avenues and managerial implications are proposed.

[1]  E. Higgins,et al.  Optimism, Promotion Pride, and Prevention Pride as Predictors of Quality of Life , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[2]  Jason Q. Zhang,et al.  When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews☆ , 2010 .

[3]  S. Sénécal,et al.  The influence of online product recommendations on consumers' online choices , 2004 .

[4]  Pranjal Gupta,et al.  How e-WOM recommendations influence product consideration and quality of choice: A motivation to process information perspective , 2010 .

[5]  Dwayne D. Gremler,et al.  Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? , 2004 .

[6]  Jang-Sun Hwang,et al.  How Consumers Evaluate eWOM (Electronic Word-of-Mouth) Messages , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[7]  D. Byrne,et al.  Attraction and similarity of personality characteristics. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Erin M. Steffes,et al.  Social ties and online word of mouth , 2009, Internet Res..

[9]  W. Bearden,et al.  Consumer Self‐Confidence: Refinements in Conceptualization and Measurement , 2001 .

[10]  Thomas Tellefsen,et al.  Toward a Theory of Business Buyer-Seller Similarity , 2001 .

[11]  X. Zhang,et al.  Impact of Online Consumer Reviews on Sales: The Moderating Role of Product and Consumer Characteristics , 2010 .

[12]  Jens Woelke,et al.  Personal Influence. The Part Played by the People in the Flow of Mass Communication , 2016 .

[13]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[14]  Roobina Ohanian The impact of celebrity spokespersons' perceived image on consumers' intention to purchase. , 1991 .

[15]  Nada Nasr Bechwati,et al.  Word of Mouse , 2008 .

[16]  J. Coyle,et al.  Electronic word of mouth: The effects of incentives on e‐referrals by senders and receivers , 2013 .

[17]  Youngme Moon,et al.  Don’t Blame the Computer: When Self-Disclosure Moderates the Self-Serving Bias , 2003 .

[18]  Nathalia Purnawirawan,et al.  Balance and Sequence in Online Reviews: How Perceived Usefulness Affects Attitudes and Intentions , 2012 .

[19]  E. Higgins,et al.  Beyond pleasure and pain. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[20]  Wendy W. Moe,et al.  Measuring the Value of Social Dynamics in Online Product Ratings Forums , 2010 .

[21]  Wonjoon Kim,et al.  The Heterogeneous Effect of WOM on Product Sales: Why the Effect of WOM Valence Is Mixed? , 2011 .

[22]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[23]  Youngme Moon Intimate Exchanges: Using Computers to Elicit Self-Disclosure from Consumers , 2000 .

[24]  Angelika Dimoka,et al.  The Nature and Role of Feedback Text Comments in Online Marketplaces: Implications for Trust Building, Price Premiums, and Seller Differentiation , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Ingoo Han,et al.  The Different Effects of Online Consumer Reviews on Consumers' Purchase Intentions Depending on Trust in Online Shopping Mall: An Advertising Perspective , 2011, Internet Res..

[26]  Mariafrancesca Sicilia,et al.  How WOM marketing contributes to new product adoption , 2013 .

[27]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  How Regulatory Fit Affects Value in Consumer Choices and Opinions , 2006 .

[28]  B. Pan,et al.  A retrospective view of electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management , 2017 .

[29]  Do-Hyung Park,et al.  eWOM overload and its effect on consumer behavioral intention depending on consumer involvement , 2008, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[30]  Chingching Chang,et al.  Opinions From Others Like You: The Role of Perceived Source Similarity , 2011 .

[31]  SchuffDavid,et al.  What makes a helpful online review? a study of customer reviews on amazon.com , 2010 .

[32]  Cheol Park,et al.  Information direction, website reputation and eWOM effect: A moderating role of product type , 2009 .

[33]  R. Goldsmith,et al.  Measuring Motivations for Online Opinion Seeking , 2006 .

[34]  S. Sen,et al.  Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the Web , 2007 .

[35]  George Y. Bizer,et al.  Self‐Schema Matching and Attitude Change: Situational and Dispositional Determinants of Message Elaboration , 2005 .

[36]  Jin Li,et al.  Online Persuasion: How the Written Word Drives WOM , 2011, Journal of Advertising Research.

[37]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[38]  Edward B. Royzman,et al.  Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion , 2001 .

[39]  R. E. Burnkrant,et al.  Informational and Normative Social Influence in Buyer Behavior , 1975 .

[40]  Jan Muntermann,et al.  AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) , 2000 .

[41]  N. Lee,et al.  Word of mouth communication within online communities: Conceptualizing the online social network , 2007 .

[42]  Tilottama G. Chowdhury,et al.  The Effect of Message's Regulatory Focus and Product Type on Persuasion , 2010 .

[43]  D. Byrne,et al.  Response to attitude similarity-dissimilarity as a function of affiliation need. , 1962, Journal of personality.

[44]  M. Zanna,et al.  Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: when and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable? , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  Deepak Khazanchi,et al.  An Empirical Study of Online Word of Mouth as a Predictor for Multi-product Category e-Commerce Sales , 2008, Electron. Mark..

[46]  David Godes,et al.  Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication , 2004 .

[47]  Huaping Chen,et al.  Credibility of Electronic Word-of-Mouth: Informational and Normative Determinants of On-line Consumer Recommendations , 2009, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[48]  Stephen J. Carson,et al.  The Effects of Positive and Negative Online Customer Reviews: Do Brand Strength and Category Maturity Matter? , 2013 .

[49]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  Effects on Buying Behavior of References to Expert and Referent Power , 1982 .

[50]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Personalized Persuasion , 2012, Psychological science.

[51]  Ronald E. Goldsmith,et al.  Electronic Word-of-Mouth , 2008 .

[52]  Anindya Ghose,et al.  Examining the Relationship Between Reviews and Sales: The Role of Reviewer Identity Disclosure in Electronic Markets , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[53]  Sejung Marina Choi,et al.  Credibility cues in online shopping: an examination of corporate credibility, retailer reputation, and product review credibility , 2012 .

[54]  W. Bearden,et al.  Reference Group Influence on Product and Brand Purchase Decisions , 1982 .

[55]  W. Crano,et al.  Attitudes and persuasion. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[56]  David Schuff,et al.  What Makes a Helpful Review? A Study of Customer Reviews on Amazon.com , 2010 .

[57]  A. Strauss Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[58]  Ann E. Schlosser Posting versus Lurking: Communicating in a Multiple Audience Context , 2005 .

[59]  Ezra Stotland,et al.  Generalization of interpersonal similarity. , 1961 .

[60]  Raji Srinivasan,et al.  Social Influence Effects in Online Product Ratings , 2012 .

[61]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[62]  Zhilin Yang,et al.  A two-path model on the effects of positivity and empathy reflected by online reviews: a choice mechanism perspective , 2012 .

[63]  Baolong Ma,et al.  The impact of online user reviews on cameras sales , 2013 .

[64]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  More than Words: The Influence of Affective Content and Linguistic Style Matches in Online Reviews on Conversion Rates , 2013 .

[65]  Iryna Pentina,et al.  Exploring source effects for online sales outcomes: the role of avatar-buyer similarity , 2010 .

[66]  Shirley Miller,et al.  What is really necessary in successful buyer/seller relationships? , 1995 .

[67]  A. Alexandrov,et al.  The effects of social- and self-motives on the intentions to share positive and negative word of mouth , 2013 .

[68]  Sanjay K. Dhar,et al.  The Effect of Sales Promotions on the Size and Composition of the Shopping Basket: Regulatory Compatibility from Framing and Temporal Restrictions , 2010 .