Effects of Shading on the Growth and Photosynthetic Fluorescence Characteristics of Castanopsis hystrix Seedlings of Top Community-Building Species in Southern Subtropical China

Castanopsis hystrix is a major community-building species in the top communities of southern subtropical China, with a high natural regeneration capacity. However, excessive logging and the introduction of exotic tree species have substantially reduced the area of natural forest patches of Castanopsis hystrix, and seedling regeneration is essential for the long-term continuation of Castanopsis hystrix populations. To explore the effects of light intensity on the seedling emergence and early growth of Castanopsis hystrix, shading experiments were conducted under four shading treatments (0%, 40%, 60%, and 80%). The growth, biomass accumulation, and distribution, the quality index of seedlings, the morphology and structure of the root systems of seedlings, and the leaf chlorophyll content and chlorophyll fluorescence properties of seedlings under different shading treatments were analyzed. The results displayed the following: (1) Shade intensity impacts growth of Castanopsis hystrix seedlings and biomass allocation, with optimal results observed at 60% shade, leading to the promotion of organic matter production in leaves and the limitation of stem growth. (2) Using a multi-indicator composite index, it was determined that seedling quality for Castanopsis hystrix peaks at 60% shade intensity. (3) Shade significantly impacts the morphology and structure of Castanopsis hystrix’s root system, with most root characteristics peaking at 60% shade, indicating a substantial increase in root development compared to no-shade conditions. (4) The D-values indicated the most suitable shade intensity for seedling growth to be 60%, suggesting that Castanopsis hystrix seedlings are sensitive to light and excessive light can be detrimental to their growth. (5) The 60% shade treatment showed the maximum values of chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics and photochemical activity, with variations in energy conversion efficiency and dissipation reflected in parameters like photochemical burst coefficient (qP), photochemical burst coefficient (qN), the actual photometric yield of PSII under light acclimation (YII), and the maximum photosynthetic electron transport rate in photoinhibition (ETR), thereby supporting seedling growth and maintaining the normal function of photosynthetic organs. In conclusion, 60% shade treatment can effectively improve the growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Castanopsis hystrix seedlings and promote the accumulation of nutrient elements, ultimately promoting their growth.

[1]  Henry Y. Sintim,et al.  Quantifying physiological contributions to nitrogen-induced yield variation in field-grown cotton , 2023, Field Crops Research.

[2]  J. Carreiras,et al.  Improving Grapevine Heat Stress Resilience with Marine Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Consortia , 2023, Microorganisms.

[3]  A. Trabucco,et al.  A Systematic Review on the Impacts of Climate Change on Coffee Agrosystems , 2022, Plants.

[4]  M. Brestič,et al.  Rice and food security: Climate change implications and the future prospects for nutritional security , 2022, Food and Energy Security.

[5]  Chuankuan Wang,et al.  Individual and interactive responses of woody plants' biomass and leaf traits to drought and shade , 2022, Global Ecology and Biogeography.

[6]  B. Feng,et al.  Unravelling the distinctive growth mechanism of proso millet ( Panicum miliaceum L.) under salt stress: From root‐to‐leaf adaptations to molecular response , 2021, GCB Bioenergy.

[7]  Kundan Kishore,et al.  Influence of shade intensity on growth, biomass allocation, yield and quality of pineapple in mango-based intercropping system , 2021 .

[8]  Xuewen Wang,et al.  Shade Effects on Peanut Yield Associate with Physiological and Expressional Regulation on Photosynthesis and Sucrose Metabolism , 2020, International journal of molecular sciences.

[9]  Liu Donglin,et al.  Effects of Shading on Physiological Characteristics and Ultrastructure of Mesophyll Cell of Emmenopterys henryi Leaves , 2020 .

[10]  N. Anten,et al.  Disentangling the effects of photosynthetically active radiation and red to far-red ratio on plant photosynthesis under canopy shading: a simulation study using a functional–structural plant model , 2019, Annals of botany.

[11]  Qichang Yang,et al.  Spatial distribution of air temperature and relative humidity in the greenhouse as affected by external shading in arid climates , 2019 .

[12]  R. Bulgari,et al.  Effect of Preharvest Abiotic Stresses on the Accumulation of Bioactive Compounds in Horticultural Produce , 2019, Front. Plant Sci..

[13]  W. Guo,et al.  Response strategies of Acer davidii to varying light regimes under different water conditions , 2019, Flora.

[14]  J. Pittermann,et al.  Influence of low light intensity on growth and biomass allocation, leaf photosynthesis and canopy radiation interception and use in two forage species ofCentrosema(DC.) Benth. , 2018, Grass and Forage Science.

[15]  Daowen Wang,et al.  Further genetic analysis of a major quantitative trait locus controlling root length and related traits in common wheat , 2014, Molecular Breeding.

[16]  S. Karpiński,et al.  Light intensity-dependent retrograde signalling in higher plants. , 2013, Journal of plant physiology.

[17]  A. Yadollahi,et al.  Estimate of Leaf Chlorophyll and Nitrogen Content in Asian Pear (Pyrus serotina Rehd.) by CCM-200 , 2011 .

[18]  Fei Xu,et al.  Leaf morphology correlates with water and light availability: What consequences for simple and compound leaves? , 2009 .

[19]  Y. Liu,et al.  Effects of shade treatments on the photosynthetic capacity, chlorophyll fluorescence, and chlorophyll content of Tetrastigma hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg , 2009 .

[20]  N. Baker.  Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis in vivo. , 2008, Annual review of plant biology.

[21]  G. Bollero,et al.  Effects of shading on common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) growth and development , 2003, Weed Science.

[22]  S. Sultan.  Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history. , 2000, Trends in plant science.

[23]  T. Glasby.  Effects of shading on subtidal epibiotic assemblages , 1999 .

[24]  J. P. Kimmins,et al.  GROWTH OF PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII AND TSUGA HETEROPHYLLA SEEDLINGS ALONG A LIGHT GRADIENT : RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND MORPHOLOGICAL ACCLIMATION , 1997 .

[25]  G. Krause,et al.  Chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool in plant physiology , 1984, Photosynthesis Research.

[26]  G. Thorne.  The Quantitative Analysis of Plant Growth. By G. Clifford Evans. , 1973 .

[27]  Wenyu Yang,et al.  Responses of photosynthetic characteristics to low light stress in ear leaves of high photosynthetic efficiency maize at narrow row of maize-soybean strip in-tercropping system , 2019, Acta Agronomica Sinica.

[28]  陈博 Chen Bo,et al.  Effects of exponential fertilization on biomass allocation and root morphology of Catalpa bungei clones , 2012 .

[29]  P. Horton,et al.  Differential adaptation of two varieties of common bean to abiotic stress: I. Effects of drought on yield and photosynthesis. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.