Opinion Dynamics under Voter and Majority Rule Models with Biased and Stubborn Agents

We study binary opinion dynamics in a network of social agents interacting among themselves according to one of the following rules: (1) Voter rule: An updating agent simply copies the opinion of another randomly sampled agent; (2) Majority rule: An updating agent samples multiple agents and adopts the majority opinion in the selected group. While opinion dynamics have been studied extensively under these rules, no prior work considers the effect of individual biases and stubbornness of the agents. We study opinion diffusion under the above rules both when the agents are biased and when different agents have different degrees of stubbornness. We show that if the agents are biased then under the voter rule the mean consensus time is logarithmic in the network size as opposed to being linear as seen in the case of with unbiased agents. Furthermore, the probability to reach consensus on the preferred opinion increases exponentially with the network size. Under the majority rule model, we observe a phase transition phenomenon, where consensus on the preferred opinion is achieved with high probability only when the initial fraction of agents having the preferred opinion is above a certain threshold. For the majority rule model with stubborn agents we find the stationary distribution of opinions in the network in the large system limit using mean field techniques. A. Mukhopadhyay is with the Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry UK. (email: arpan.mukhopadhyay@warwick.ac.uk). R. R. Mazumdar is with the department of Electrical and Computer Eng., University of Waterloo, Canada (email: mazum@uwaterloo.ca). R. Roy is with the Theoretical Statistics and Mathematics Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi, India (email: rahul@isid.ac.in).

[1]  T. Kurtz Solutions of ordinary differential equations as limits of pure jump markov processes , 1970, Journal of Applied Probability.

[2]  S. Redner,et al.  Consensus formation in multi-state majority and plurality models , 2005 .

[3]  S. Galam Minority opinion spreading in random geometry , 2002, cond-mat/0203553.

[4]  Shmuel Tomi Klein,et al.  The number of fixed points of the majority rule , 1988, Discret. Math..

[5]  Fabrizio Luccio,et al.  Dynamic monopolies in tori , 2004, Discret. Appl. Math..

[6]  Mehmet E. Yildiz,et al.  Binary Opinion Dynamics with Stubborn Agents , 2013, TEAC.

[7]  S. Redner,et al.  Dynamics of majority rule in two-state interacting spin systems. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[8]  Colin Cooper,et al.  The Power of Two Choices in Distributed Voting , 2014, ICALP.

[9]  Ayalvadi Ganesh,et al.  Probabilistic consensus via polling and majority rules , 2013, Queueing Syst. Theory Appl..

[10]  Gadi Moran The r-majority vote action on 0-1 sequences , 1994, Discret. Math..

[11]  S Redner,et al.  Majority rule dynamics in finite dimensions. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  P. Clifford,et al.  A model for spatial conflict , 1973 .

[13]  S. Redner,et al.  On the role of zealotry in the voter model , 2007 .

[14]  Mehmet E. Yildiz,et al.  Voting models in random networks , 2010, 2010 Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA).

[15]  Milan Vojnovic,et al.  Using Three States for Binary Consensus on Complete Graphs , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[16]  Krapivsky Kinetics of monomer-monomer surface catalytic reactions. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[17]  Elchanan Mossel,et al.  Majority dynamics and aggregation of information in social networks , 2012, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[18]  Glenn Ellison,et al.  Rules of Thumb for Social Learning , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[19]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Problems in decentralized decision making and computation , 1984 .

[20]  S. Redner,et al.  Voter model on heterogeneous graphs. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[21]  Susan H. Xu,et al.  Technology diffusion by learning from neighbours , 2004, Advances in Applied Probability.

[22]  Antar Bandyopadhyay,et al.  On the One Dimensional "Learning from Neighbours" Model , 2010 .

[23]  M. Degroot Reaching a Consensus , 1974 .

[24]  R. Holley,et al.  Ergodic Theorems for Weakly Interacting Infinite Systems and the Voter Model , 1975 .