Organizational Learning and Multiteam Systems

Multiteam systems consist of two or more teams, each of which pursues subordinate team goals, while working interdependently with at least one other team toward a superordinate goal. Many teams work in these larger organizational systems, where oft-cited challenges involve learning processes within and between teams. This chapter brings a learning perspective to multiteam systems and a multiteam system perspective to organizational learning. Several classic illustrations of organizational learning—for example, the Challenger and Columbia disasters—actually point to failures in organizational learning processes within and between teams. We offer the focus on intrateam knowledge creation and retention and interteam knowledge transfer as a useful starting point for thinking about how to conceptually and operationally define learning in multiteam systems. Furthermore, we think leadership structures and multiteam emergent states are particularly valuable drivers of learning.

[1]  Stephen M. Fiore,et al.  Charting a course for collaboration: a multiteam perspective , 2012, Translational behavioral medicine.

[2]  Anita L. Tucker,et al.  Implementing New Practices: An Empirical Study of Organizational Learning in Hospital Intensive Care Units , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[3]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  THE CASE FOR CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY , 1983 .

[4]  James G. March,et al.  Learning from samples of one or fewer* , 1991 .

[5]  D. Isbell,et al.  Mars Climate Orbiter Team Finds Likely Cause Of Loss , 2007 .

[6]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[7]  Dorothy R. Carter,et al.  Mind the gap: The role of leadership in multiteam system collective cognition , 2014 .

[8]  Eric D. Darr,et al.  The Acquisition, Transfer, and Depreciation of Knowledge in Service Organizations: Productivity in Franchises , 1995 .

[9]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  Perspectives: Teams Won’t Solve This Problem , 2010, Hum. Factors.

[10]  Michael S. Cole,et al.  Shared Authentic Leadership and New Venture Performance , 2012 .

[11]  William S. Kramer,et al.  The Science of Multiteam Systems , 2015 .

[12]  Yuqing Ren,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems , 2012 .

[13]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. , 2002 .

[14]  Ruth Kanfer,et al.  Motivation in Multiteam Systems , 2012 .

[15]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Same page, different books: : Extending representational gaps theory to enhance performance in multiteam systems , 2014 .

[16]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory: Evolutionary Paths and Future Advances , 2006 .

[17]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  Multiteam Systems: A Structural Framework and Meso-Theory of System Functioning , 2018 .

[18]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities , 1999 .

[19]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[20]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  The double-edged sword of decentralized planning in multiteam systems. , 2013 .

[21]  B. Mullen,et al.  The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. , 1994 .

[22]  D. Beal,et al.  Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[24]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  Multiteam Systems: An Introduction , 2012 .

[25]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  Teamwork in multiteam systems. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  Peter Thompson,et al.  How Much Did the Liberty Shipbuilders Forget? , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Yuqing Ren,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems 1985–2010: An Integrative Framework of Key Dimensions, Antecedents, and Consequences , 2011 .

[28]  Pamela R. Haunschild Julianne G. Mahler: Organizational Learning at NASA: The Challenger and Columbia Accidents. , 2009 .

[29]  Stephen J. Zaccaro,et al.  The shared leadership of teams: A meta-analysis of proximal, distal, and moderating relationships , 2014 .

[30]  C. Galbraith Transferring Core Manufacturing Technologies in High-Technology Firms , 1990 .

[31]  Arwen H. DeCostanza,et al.  Cohesion with Large Collectives: A Multiteam Systems Perspective , 2015 .

[32]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[33]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[34]  J. Howk,et al.  Team of Teams: New Rules of Engagement for a Complex World , 2015 .

[35]  L. Argote,et al.  The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings , 1990 .

[36]  Andrew M. Carton,et al.  A Theory of Subgroups in Work Teams , 2012 .

[37]  Marissa L. Shuffler,et al.  Pushing the Boundaries of Multiteam Systems in Research and Practice: An Introduction , 2014 .

[38]  Linda Argote,et al.  Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[39]  Linda Argote,et al.  Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[40]  W. Starbuck,et al.  Organization at the limit : lessons from the Columbia disaster , 2005 .

[41]  Dorothy R. Carter,et al.  Social network approaches to leadership: an integrative conceptual review. , 2015, The Journal of applied psychology.

[42]  Brian Keegan,et al.  The topology of collective leadership , 2012 .

[43]  Noshir S. Contractor,et al.  Space, time, and the development of shared leadership networks in multiteam systems , 2015, Network Science.

[44]  A. Edmondson Speaking Up in the Operating Room: How Team Leaders Promote Learning in Interdisciplinary Action Teams , 2003 .

[45]  T. Wall,et al.  The impact of autonomy and task uncertainty on team performance: A longitudinal field study , 2010 .

[46]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  Leadership in multiteam systems. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[47]  Craig L. Pearce,et al.  A Landscape of Opportunities: Future Research on Shared Leadership , 2003 .

[48]  A. Edmondson Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[49]  E. Thorndike The Principles of Teaching: Based on Psychology , 1999 .

[50]  M. Sherif Superordinate Goals in the Reduction of Intergroup Conflict , 1958, American Journal of Sociology.

[51]  L. Argote Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. , 1982, Administrative science quarterly.

[52]  Kara A. Incalcaterra,et al.  A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[53]  Peter M. Madsen,et al.  Failing to Learn? The Effects of Failure and Success on Organizational Learning in the Global Orbital Launch Vehicle Industry , 2010 .

[54]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  The Contingent Effects of Transactive Memory: When Is It More Beneficial to Know What Others Know? , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[55]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: a meta-analysis. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[56]  Dustin J. Sleesman,et al.  Coordinated action in multiteam systems. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.

[57]  Dennis J. Devine,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Cohesion and Performance , 1995 .

[58]  Reeshad S. Dalal,et al.  An Organizational Psychology Perspective to Examining Computer Security Incident Response Teams , 2014, IEEE Security & Privacy.

[59]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  The Local and Variegated Nature of Learning in Organizations: A Group-Level Perspective , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[60]  M. Polanyi The Logic of Tacit Inference , 1966, Philosophy.

[61]  G. Dirosa Emergent Phenomena in Multiteam Systems: An Examination of Between-Team Cohesion , 2013 .