Prehension is really reaching and grasping

Prehension has traditionally been seen as the act of coordinated reaching and grasping. However, recently, Smeets and Brenner (in Motor Control 3:237–271, 1999) proposed that we might just as well look at prehension as the combination of two independently moving digits. The hand aperture that has featured prominently in many studies on prehension, according to Smeets and Brenner’s “double-pointing hypothesis”, is really an emergent property related to the time course of the positions of the two digits moving to their respective end points. We tested this double-pointing hypothesis by perturbing the end position of one of the digits while leaving the end position of the opposing digit unchanged. To this end, we had participants reach for and grasp a metallic object of which the side surfaces could be made to slide in and out. We administered the perturbation right after movement initiation. On several occasions, after perturbing the end position of one digit, we found effects also on the kinematics of the opposing digit. These findings are in conflict with Smeets and Brenner’s double-pointing hypothesis.

[1]  M. Jeannerod.  Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects , 1981 .

[2]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  Perceptual Structures and Distributed Motor Control , 1981 .

[3]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and performance IX , 1982 .

[4]  A. Wing,et al.  The Contribution of the Thumb to Reaching Movements , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[5]  J. Kelso,et al.  Functionally specific articulatory cooperation following jaw perturbations during speech: evidence for coordinative structures. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  W H Warren,et al.  Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  M. Jeannerod.  The timing of natural prehension movements. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[8]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  W. Warren,et al.  Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  M. Jeannerod.  The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements , 1990, Psychological Medicine.

[11]  E. Reed.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[12]  K. Newell,et al.  Body scale and the development of prehension. , 1989, Developmental psychobiology.

[13]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  Reinoud J. Bootsma,et al.  Spatio-temporal organisation of natural prehension , 1992 .

[15]  M. Gentilucci,et al.  Temporal coupling between transport and grasp components during prehension movements: effects of visual perturbation , 1992, Behavioural Brain Research.

[16]  M. A. Arbib,et al.  Models of Trajectory Formation and Temporal Interaction of Reach and Grasp. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[17]  M. Arbib,et al.  Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Prehension Movements: The Visuomotor Channels Hypothesis Revisited , 1996 .

[19]  P Haggard,et al.  On the hand transport component of prehensile movements. , 1997, Journal of motor behavior.

[20]  R. J. Bootsma,et al.  Coordination in prehension Information-based coupling of reaching and grasping , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  Jinsung Wang,et al.  Coordination among the body segments during reach-to-grasp action involving the trunk , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  G J Savelsbergh,et al.  Body-scaled ratio as a control parameter for prehension in 5- to 9-year-old children. , 1998, Developmental psychobiology.

[23]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Approaching grasping from different perspectives. , 1999, Motor control.

[24]  E. Brenner,et al.  A new view on grasping. , 1999, Motor control.

[25]  K. Newell,et al.  On taking the grasping out of prehension. , 1999, Motor control.

[26]  R. Marteniuk,et al.  On achieving strong inference in prehension research. , 1999, Motor control.

[27]  M. Jeannerod.  Visuomotor channels: Their integration in goal-directed prehension , 1999 .

[28]  B. Steenbergen.  What can be learned from Smeets and Brenner's model about the control of grasping? , 1999, Motor control.

[29]  K. Newell,et al.  The scaling of human grip configurations. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Spatial and temporal control of trunk-assisted prehensile actions , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  K. Newell,et al.  Body scaling of grip configurations in children aged 6-12 years. , 2000, Developmental Psychobiology.

[32]  K. Newell,et al.  Body-scaled transitions in human grip configurations. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  George E. Stelmach,et al.  Spatial and temporal control of trunk-assisted prehensile actions , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  E. Brenner,et al.  Independent movements of the digits in grasping , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Independent control of the digits predicts an apparent hierarchy of visuomotor channels in grasping , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[36]  U. Castiello,et al.  Reach to grasp: the natural response to perturbation of object size , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  H. Hecht,et al.  Time-to-contact , 2004 .

[38]  R. Bootsma,et al.  Chapter 17 The use of time-to-contact information for the initiation of hand closure in natural prehension , 2004 .

[39]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements , 1991, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  U. Castiello.  The neuroscience of grasping , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[41]  George E Stelmach,et al.  Effect of Orienting the Finger Opposition Space in the Control of Reach-to-Grasp Movements , 2005, Journal of motor behavior.

[42]  Miya K. Rand,et al.  Effect of speed manipulation on the control of aperture closure during reach-to-grasp movements , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Judging and actualizing intrapersonal and interpersonal affordances. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.