Which robot am I thinking about? The impact of action and appearance on people's evaluations of a moral robot

In three studies we found further evidence for a previously discovered Human-Robot (HR) asymmetry in moral judgments: that people blame robots more for inaction than action in a moral dilemma but blame humans more for action than inaction in the identical dilemma (where inaction allows four persons to die and action sacrifices one to save the four). Importantly, we found that people's representation of the “robot” making these moral decisions appears to be one of a mechanical robot. For when we manipulated the pictorial display of a verbally described robot, people showed the HR asymmetry only when making judgments about a mechanical-looking robot, not a humanoid robot. This is the first demonstration that robot appearance affects people's moral judgments about robots.

[1]  Matthias Scheutz,et al.  “Think and do the right thing” — A Plea for morally competent autonomous robots , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Science, Technology and Engineering.

[2]  Siddhartha S. Srinivasa,et al.  Effects of Robot Motion on Human-Robot Collaboration , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[3]  Matthias Scheutz,et al.  Sacrifice One For the Good of Many? People Apply Different Moral Norms to Human and Robot Agents , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[4]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall , 1972 .

[5]  Richard Buchanan,et al.  Wicked Problems in Design Thinking , 1992 .

[6]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  Eliciting information from people with a gendered humanoid robot , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[7]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads , 2002, DIS '02.

[8]  Bertram F. Malle,et al.  A Social-Conceptual Map of Moral Criticism , 2014, CogSci.

[9]  Siddharth Suri,et al.  Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[10]  Scott McCloud.  Understanding comics: the invisible art = Memahami komik / Scott McCloud; penerjemah S. Kinanti , 2001 .

[11]  F. Eyssel,et al.  Social categorization of social robots: anthropomorphism as a function of robot group membership. , 2012, The British journal of social psychology.

[12]  Friederike Eyssel,et al.  ‘If you sound like me, you must be more human’: On the interplay of robot and user features on human-robot acceptance and anthropomorphism , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[13]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Do people hold a humanoid robot morally accountable for the harm it causes? , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[14]  F. Schmidt.  Statistical Significance Testing and Cumulative Knowledge in Psychology: Implications for Training of Researchers , 1996 .

[15]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness , 1985 .

[16]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Evidence that Robots Trigger a Cheating Detector in Humans , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[17]  Andrew D. Engell,et al.  The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment , 2004, Neuron.

[18]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Whose job is it anyway? a study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task , 2004 .

[19]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment , 2001, Science.

[20]  Patrick Lin,et al.  A Body to Kick, but Still No Soul to Damn: Legal Perspectives on Robotics , 2012 .

[21]  Jodi Forlizzi.  Towards the Design and Development of Future Robotic Products and Systems , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[22]  Bertram F. Malle,et al.  Bringing free will down to Earth: People’s psychological concept of free will and its role in moral judgment , 2014, Consciousness and Cognition.

[23]  Hari Sundaram,et al.  Modeling user context with applications to media retrieval , 2006, Multimedia Systems.

[24]  D. Wegner,et al.  Dimensions of Mind Perception , 2007, Science.

[25]  F. Gino,et al.  Blind ethics: Closing one’s eyes polarizes moral judgments and discourages dishonest behavior , 2011, Cognition.

[26]  Matthias Scheutz,et al.  How Robots Can Affect Human Behavior: Investigating the Effects of Robotic Displays of Protest and Distress , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[27]  Jesse J. Chandler,et al.  Inside the Turk , 2014 .

[28]  Elinor Amit,et al.  You See, the Ends Don’t Justify the Means , 2012, Psychological science.

[29]  C. Harrison.  Visual Social Semiotics: Understanding How Still Images Make Meaning , 2003 .

[30]  Bertram F. Malle,et al.  A Theory of Blame , 2014 .

[31]  Ronald C. Arkin,et al.  Governing Lethal Behavior in Autonomous Robots , 2009 .

[32]  Wendy Ju,et al.  The Design of Implicit Interactions , 2015, Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics.

[33]  Matthias Scheutz,et al.  Moral competence in social robots , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Science, Technology and Engineering.

[34]  Todd M. Gureckis,et al.  CUNY Academic , 2016 .

[35]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis,et al.  Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.