On-line processing in candidate evaluation: The effects of issue order, issue importance, and sophistication

This article reports the results of a study that replicates and extends the impression-driven model of candidate evaluation reported in Lodge, McGraw, and Stroh (1989). This model holds that evaluations are formed and updated on-line as information is encountered, and that as a result, citizens need not rely on specific information available from memory to form their candidate evaluations. In the present work we explore whether the order in which information is encountered, as well as whether information that is personally important, influences the weight accorded to evidence in on-line processing. In addition, differences in information-processing strategies due to political sophistication are examined. The results indicate that important information receives more weight than unimportant information. In addition, the evidence suggests that political sophisticates are more efficient on-line processors than are less sophisticated individuals. The implications of these results for models of candidate evaluation are discussed.

[1]  Kathleen M. McGraw,et al.  An Impression-Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[2]  J. Zaller.  Political awareness, elite opinion leadership, and the mass survey response , 1990 .

[3]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[4]  S. Fiske,et al.  The novice and the expert: Knowledge-based strategies in political cognition , 1983 .

[5]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  The independence of evaluative and item information: Impression and recall order effects in behavior-based impression formation. , 1979 .

[6]  Richard R. Lau,et al.  Political cognition : the 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition , 1986 .

[7]  Kathleen M. McGraw,et al.  The Effects of General and Domain-Specific Expertise on Political Memory and Judgment , 1990 .

[8]  J. Krosnick.  The role of attitude importance in social evaluation: a study of policy preferences, presidential candidate evaluations, and voting behavior. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Human cognition in its social context. , 1986, Psychological review.

[10]  R. H. Stewart.  EFFECT OF CONTINUOUS RESPONDING ON THE ORDER EFFECT IN PERSONALITY IMPRESSION FORMATION. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  N. Anderson,et al.  New light on order effects in attitude change. , 1973 .

[12]  R. Hastie,et al.  The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line , 1986 .

[13]  Stanley Kelley,et al.  The Simple Act of Voting , 1974 .

[14]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science , 1985, American Political Science Review.

[15]  Milton Lodge,et al.  A Partisan Schema for Political Information Processing , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[16]  Thomas K. Srull,et al.  Processing objectives as a determinant of the relationship between recall and judgment , 1987 .

[17]  John A. Herstein.  Keeping the voter's limits in mind: A cognitive process analysis of decision making in voting. , 1981 .

[18]  Norman H. Anderson,et al.  Effects of concomitant verbal recall on order effects in personality impression formation , 1963 .