Convergent Products: What Functionalities Add More Value to the Base?

Convergence in the electronics sector has enabled the addition of disparate new functionalities to existing base products (e.g., adding mobile television to a cell phone or Internet access to a personal digital assistant). This research investigates the role of two factors—(1) the goal congruence between the added functionality and the base and (2) the nature of the base product (utilitarian versus hedonic)—on the evaluation of such convergent products (CPs). The author proposes that the evaluation of CPs with a utilitarian versus hedonic base is subject to an asymmetric additivity effect. Specifically, whereas CPs with a utilitarian base gain more from adding an incongruent, hedonic functionality than a congruent, utilitarian one, CPs with a hedonic base gain less from an incongruent, utilitarian addition than a congruent, hedonic one. This asymmetry is because hedonic additions enhance the pleasure of using a utilitarian base, whereas utilitarian additions may dilute the existing hedonic image of a hedonic base. The moderating role of prior ownership of the base of a CP is also explored. The author proposes that the effects of goal congruence are stronger for owners than for nonowners, but only for CPs with a hedonic base, not for those with a utilitarian base. The author verifies the proposed effects in an experimental study conducted with a large-scale, representative sample of the target market population. Further research on other (moderating) factors affecting the evaluation of CPs is also suggested.

[1]  Roland T. Rust,et al.  Feature Fatigue: When Product Capabilities Become Too Much of a Good Thing , 2005 .

[2]  M. J. Houston,et al.  Goal-Oriented Experiences and the Development of Knowledge , 1993 .

[3]  Laura Ries,et al.  The Origin of Brands , 2004 .

[4]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[5]  P. Herr,et al.  On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects , 1983 .

[6]  B. Shiv,et al.  Heart and Mind in Conflict: The Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Consumer Decision Making , 1999 .

[7]  Punam Anand Keller,et al.  Differences in the Relative Influence of Product Attributes Under Alternative Processing Conditions , 1994 .

[8]  Laura Ries,et al.  The origin of brands : discover the natural laws of product innovation and business survival , 2004 .

[9]  Charles A. Ingene,et al.  Cash Discounts to Retail Customers: An Alternative to Credit Card Sales , 1982 .

[10]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Psychophysics: Introduction to Its Perceptual, Neural and Social Prospects , 1975 .

[11]  Laurette Dubé,et al.  What is a Leather Iron or a Bird Phone? Using Conceptual Combinations to Generate and Understand New Product Concepts , 2007 .

[12]  Erica Mina Okada,et al.  Upgrades and New Purchases , 2006 .

[13]  Gregory S. Carpenter,et al.  Consumer Preference Formation and Pioneering Advantage , 1989 .

[14]  A. A. Mitchell,et al.  The Assessment of Alternative Measures of Consumer Expertise , 1996 .

[15]  Punam Anand Keller,et al.  Differences in the relative influence of product attributes under alternative processing conditions: Attribute importance versus attribute ease of imagability , 1994 .

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model , 1991 .

[17]  James K. Beggan.  On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect. , 1992 .

[18]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Product, person, and purpose: putting the consumer back into theories of dynamic market behaviour , 1999 .

[19]  R. Belk.  Possessions and the Extended Self , 1988 .

[20]  E. Hirschman,et al.  Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions , 1982 .

[21]  D. Gentner,et al.  Splitting the Differences: A Structural Alignment View of Similarity , 1993 .

[22]  R. Batra,et al.  Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes , 1991 .

[23]  R. Dhar,et al.  Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods , 2000 .

[24]  Paschalina Ziamou,et al.  Innovations in Product Functionality: When and Why Are Explicit Comparisons Effective? , 2003 .

[25]  J. H. Gilmore,et al.  Welcome to the experience economy. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[26]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Amna Kirmani,et al.  The Ownership Effect in Consumer Responses to Brand Line Stretches , 1999 .

[28]  I. Simonson,et al.  The Effect of New Product Features on Brand Choice , 1996 .

[29]  Linda L. Price,et al.  The Role of Imagery in Information Processing: Review and Extensions , 1987 .

[30]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation , 1989 .

[31]  Roberto Verganti.  Innovación mediante el diseño , 2006 .

[32]  H. Gatignon,et al.  Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance , 1997 .

[33]  David B. Yoffie,et al.  Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence , 1997 .

[34]  Debora Viana Thompson,et al.  Defeating feature fatigue. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[35]  Shantanu Dutta,et al.  How Does Enforcement Deter Gray Market Incidence , 2005 .

[36]  Kevin E. Voss,et al.  Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Consumer Attitude , 2003 .

[37]  David W. Stewart,et al.  The Differential Impact of Goal Congruency on Attitudes, Intentions, and the Transfer of Brand Equity , 2001 .