Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand

[1]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension , 1994, Current Biology.

[2]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[3]  L. Jakobson,et al.  A kinematic analysis of reaching and grasping movements in a patient recovering from optic ataxia , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  L. Jakobson,et al.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them , 1991, Nature.

[5]  M. Jeannerod.  The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements , 1990, Psychological Medicine.

[6]  S. Lehman.  The Neural and Behavioural Organization of Goal‐Directed Movements , 1990, Neurology.

[7]  M. Perenin,et al.  Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects. , 1988, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement , 1986, Nature.

[9]  M. Jeannerod.  The timing of natural prehension movements. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[10]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  R. W. Ditchburn.  Seeing is Deceiving: The Psychology of Visual Illusions , 1979 .

[12]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  R. Gregory,et al.  Distortion of Visual Space as Inappropriate Constancy Scaling , 1963, Nature.

[14]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[15]  A Mack,et al.  Saccadic programming and perceived location. , 1981, Acta psychologica.