Evaluating the “recovery level” of endangered species without prior information before alien invasion

For maintaining social and financial support for eradication programs of invasive species, quantitative assessment of recovery of native species or ecosystems is important because it provides a measurable parameter of success. However, setting a concrete goal for recovery is often difficult owing to lack of information prior to the introduction of invaders. Here, we present a novel approach to evaluate the achievement level of invasive predator management based on the carrying capacity of endangered species estimated using long-term monitoring data. In Amami-Oshima Island, Japan, where the eradication project of introduced small Indian mongoose is ongoing since 2000, we surveyed the population densities of four endangered species threatened by the mongoose (Amami rabbit, the Otton frog, Amami tip-nosed frog, and Amami Ishikawa's frog) at four time points ranging from 2003 to 2011. We estimated the carrying capacities of these species using the logistic growth model combined with the effects of mongoose predation and environmental heterogeneity. All species showed clear tendencies toward increasing their density in line with decreased mongoose density, and they exhibited density-dependent population growth. The estimated carrying capacities of three endangered species had small confidence intervals enough to measure recovery levels by the mongoose management. The population density of each endangered species has recovered to the level of the carrying capacity at about 20–40% of all sites, whereas no individuals were observed at more than 25% of all sites. We propose that the present approach involving appropriate monitoring data of native organism populations will be widely applicable to various eradication projects and provide unambiguous goals for management of invasive species.

[1]  A. Sinclair,et al.  Population regulation in animals , 1989 .

[2]  H. Hirakawa,et al.  Distribution and abundance of the Amami rabbit Pentalagus furnessi in the Amami and Tokuno Islands, Japan , 2000, Oryx.

[3]  Eradications of vertebrate pests from islands around New Zealand : what have we delivered and what have we learned ? , 2011 .

[4]  E. Bonnaud,et al.  Eradication of alien invasive species: surprise effects and conservation successes , 2011 .

[5]  Graeme Caughley,et al.  Wildlife Ecology and Management , 1994 .

[6]  T. Miyashita,et al.  Impact of exotic fish removal on native communities in farm ponds , 2004, Ecological Research.

[7]  D. Towns Korapuki Island as a case study for restoration of insular ecosystems in New Zealand , 2002 .

[8]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[9]  Kirsty J. Park Assessment and Management of Invasive Alien Predators , 2004 .

[10]  D. Simberloff How Much Information on Population Biology Is Needed to Manage Introduced Species? , 2003 .

[11]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. , 2000, Science.

[12]  T. Tomari An epidemiological study of the occurrence of habu snake bite on the Amami Islands, Japan. , 1987, International Journal of Epidemiology.

[13]  Harold A. Mooney,et al.  Review Eradication: What Can Go Wrong Viewing Invasive Species Removal in a Whole-ecosystem Context , 2022 .

[14]  M. Samways,et al.  Recovery of Endemic Dragonflies after Removal of Invasive Alien Trees , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[15]  Kristin Shrader-Frechette,et al.  Nonindigenous Species: Ecological Explanation, Environmental Ethics, and Public Policy , 2003 .

[16]  Mark E Hauber,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity of mesopredator release within an oceanic island system , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  S. Abe Food habits of feral mongoose (Herpestes sp.) on Amamioshima, Japan , 1998 .

[18]  Diane L Larson,et al.  A framework for sustainable invasive species management: Environmental, social, and economic objectives. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[19]  George Sugihara,et al.  Cats protecting birds: modelling the mesopredator release effect , 1999 .

[20]  F. Yamada Negative impact of an invasive small Indian mongoose Herpestes javanicus on native wildlife species and evaluation of a control project in Amami-Ohshima and Okinawa islands, Japan , 2004 .

[21]  D. Simberloff,et al.  A review of small Indian mongoose management and eradications on islands , 2011 .

[22]  S. Takatsuki,et al.  Effects of exotic mongoose (Herpestes javanicus) on the native fauna of Amami-Oshima Island, southern Japan, estimated by distribution patterns along the historical gradient of mongoose invasion , 2007, Biological Invasions.

[23]  T. Hashimoto,et al.  Reconstruction and prediction of invasive mongoose population dynamics from history of introduction and management: a Bayesian state-space modelling approach. , 2013 .

[24]  S. Wood Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models , 2011 .

[25]  F. Koike,et al.  Assessment and Control of Biological Invasion Risks , 2006 .

[26]  F. Yamada,et al.  Pentalagus furnessi , 2005 .

[27]  E. Sanderson How Many Animals Do We Want to Save? The Many Ways of Setting Population Target Levels for Conservation , 2006 .

[28]  Gregg Howald,et al.  Invasive Rodent Eradication on Islands , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[29]  Hitoshi Suzuki,et al.  Molecular phylogeny of Japanese Leporidae, the Amami rabbit Pentalagus furnessi, the Japanese hare Lepus brachyurus, and the mountain hare Lepus timidus, inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. , 2002, Genes & genetic systems.

[30]  H. Jones Prognosis for ecosystem recovery following rodent eradication and seabird restoration in an island archipelago. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[31]  F. Courchamp,et al.  Mammal invaders on islands: impact, control and control impact , 2003, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[32]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Impact of the small Indian mongoose on native amphibians and reptiles of the Adriatic islands, Croatia , 2010 .

[33]  John P. Wilson,et al.  Terrain analysis : principles and applications , 2000 .

[34]  Mark Pagel,et al.  On the stability of populations of mammals, birds, fish and insects. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[35]  T. Hashimoto,et al.  Differential population responses of native and alien rodents to an invasive predator, habitat alteration and plant masting , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  J. M. Cherrett,et al.  Ecological Concepts: The Contribution of Ecology to an Understanding of the Natural World , 1989 .

[37]  阿部 慎太郎,et al.  希少種アマミノクロウサギ、Pentalagus furnessi の現状と保全 , 2000 .

[38]  T. Fukami,et al.  Direct and indirect effects of rats: does rat eradication restore ecosystem functioning of New Zealand seabird islands? , 2009, Biological Invasions.

[39]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  We can eliminate invasions or live with them. Successful management projects , 2008, Biological Invasions.

[40]  J. Connell,et al.  On the Evidence Needed to Judge Ecological Stability or Persistence , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[41]  M. Clout,et al.  The eradication of mammals from New Zealand islands , 2006 .